loader image

Shaky Foundations of Israeli Coalition Gov’t and Its Foreign Implications

2020/03/22 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online: A researcher on Zionist regime studies enumerating the characteristics of Benny Gantz's possible government said he does not have the experience and special international relations that Netanyahu had and because of a number of issues both domestically and internationally it will have a weaker government.

In an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations: Ali Abdi said that although there were obstacles in the way of Benny Gantz, leader of the Blue and White Party for the formation of the government but as a whole the formation of this government is conceivable. He said the split and plurality that exists in his coalition front is one of the obstacles. In this coalition, on one side Lieberman is at the far end of the Right Front and on the other is the Arab Front or the Palestinian Front of 1948 led by Ayman Odeh.

He also emphasized: Such a sharp plurality will exacerbate the differences on his coalition front; nevertheless because the coalition is willing to do anything to prevent Netanyahu from coming to power again and not be able to form a government, Gantz’s introduction of a government seems easy and very likely. The fact that Reuven Rivlin, the head of the Zionist regime, has entrusted Gantz with the formation of government shows that fulfilment of this task by him is more likely than Netanyahu.

The Zionist regime studies researcher described the features of this probable government: “Although it will not differ from the Netanyahu government in its macro strategies and principles — since they are both Zionist in nature — we will certainly see some differences, including internationally because Netanyahu was a weight for himself and had extensive and deep connections to the centres of global capitalism and global Zionism, but Gantz does not have such links.

Gantz’s Weak Government Internally and Internationally

Abdi described the special relationship between Trump and Netanyahu as one of the most important and influential relationships, and continued: “Benny Gantz does not have these types of ties because in some cases he will have a weaker government both internally and internationally.” Netanyahu had gained a reputation for the past 10 years that could be described as unrivalled within the Zionist regime, for this reason, he was very powerful. Therefore, Gantz has a very difficult path ahead with many ups and downs and true that his government will not be different in macro strategies and principles but will show serious differences in practice.

Gantz’s Government Would Improve Relations with Europe

Commenting on the features of the external relations of the future Zionist government, he said, “The Gantz government will definitely move towards improving relations with Europe, unlike Netanyahu, whose relationship with the US has greatly overshadowed ties with Europe. Benny Gantz does not have the kind of special relationship Netanyahu had with the White House, the Congress, and power centres such as AIPAC within the Zionist regime and Zionist currents within the United States.

Continued Secret Relations with the Certain Arab States

Abdi said that Gantz had also raised the issue of strengthening relations with Europe in his election campaign. He added that Gantz will follow strategies such as strengthening relations with Arab states and the secret diplomacy line with Oman, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia, which Netanyahu had started with Mossad Chief Yossi Cohen playing the central role. But the distinction will be that he will not put all his eggs in the US basket and will try to move forward by improving relations with Europe and putting relations with China and Russia on the agenda.

He said that Gantz has no experience in international diplomatic and political work, adding: “Netanyahu began his political career within the Zionist regime with diplomatic work and the first post he took was the Zionist regime’s envoy to the United Nations in the early 1980s and gained a lot of experience in diplomacy and international relations. But Gantz has no such experience. His only experience is in the military field and this will make him weaker than Netanyahu.

The scholar emphasized that Netanyahu brought many achievements to the Zionist regime internationally.  Boosting ties with Arab states, Latin America, Africa, China, India and Russia are credits Netanyahu has in his record. Whether Gantz can maintain and reinforce these records will depend on his personality and type of politics, as he does not yet have the diplomatic experience of Netanyahu.

At the same time, he said, despite the fact that Gantz’s coming would not make a serious difference in terms of Palestine and the Resistance; it can provide a breathing space for the Resistance front. Because Gantz has no track record of government and statesmanship, there will be a one-year opportunity for the Resistance to be organized until he gets a chance to become dominant.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

New EU Strategy on Cooperation with the Persian Gulf, Its Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Guest Opinion: Normalization of Iran-Saudi relations with China’s mediation, which is an indication of Beijing’s more significant influence and role in new regional trends in the Middle East, increased speculations about the possibility of changes in the geostrategy of other powers.
Abbas Aslani – Expert on international relations

Foreign Policy Challenges of the New Greek Government

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the holding of the national elections in Greece on May 21, although the winning party announced priorities of its future government to be mainly improvement of the economic situation, the continuation of the national policy in foreign relations, security, and immigration would be most important challenges for this EU and NATO member country. Although the new leaders defend the continuation of the foreign and defense policy, strengthening of the country’s armed forces, creation of solid alliances, and development of the weapons program over the past four years, they differ in the field of energy exploration, the militarization of some islands in the Aegean Sea, and the issue of refugees.
Mahmoud Fazeli – International Affairs analyst

Arming Taiwan, One of the US Pressure Levers against China

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An analyst of international affairs called the provision of various types of US military-armament aid to Taiwan one of the foundations of Washington’ towards that island and said: The Chinese have intelligently realized that the US measures must be accompanied by proportionate reactions to make them fully understand that Beijing will not sit idly by the expansion of US-Taiwan relations and the increasing dispatch of US weapons to Taiwan.

What is the new position of the dollar in the global economy?

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: The confrontation between Americanization and the Chineseization of the world has created a new acting field. While the Chinese side’s efforts to reduce the international power of the dollar and increase the global acceptance of the yuan have an increasing trend, it is not possible to correctly analyze and scenarioize the possible futures of this confrontation and the new arena of acting by relying on emotional and exaggerated reactions, and of course far from scientific neutrality.
Reza Majidzadeh—Researcher of economics

Fate of Afghanistan under Shadow of Taliban-Intl. Community Conflict

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A researcher on Afghanistan affairs, criticizing the weak role and performance of the United Nations regarding Afghanistan, emphasized: The difference of views, heterogeneous and different performances of countries regarding Afghanistan, along with the weak role of the United Nations, have completed the cycle of failure and in this situation, with the increasing risk of isolation of the Taliban, their leadership is gaining more power.

Establishing Chinese order in the region is one of the strategic goals of the Islamabad meeting

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on Asian issues considered the tripartite meeting in Islamabad regarding Afghanistan as another Chinese initiative to establish peace and stability in the region by using economic tools, adding that this meeting arose from the security concerns of Pakistan and China concerning the realization of their political and economic interests in Afghanistan.

The strategic importance of resuming relations between Iran and Egypt

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: After the resumption of diplomatic relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia created a wave of positive developments in the region and encouraged other Persian Gulf countries to resume or strengthen ties with the Islamic Republic of Iran, now the news indicates that Iran and Egypt with the mediation of Iraq are trying to resume diplomatic relations.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University scholar

Strategic Importance of Organizing Legal Acceptance of Afghans in Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: Former official in charge of Afghanistan Support Headquarters at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said: Iranian people are witnessing the high and unusual presence of Afghan refugees, adding that vigilance is needed concerning their presence in the strategic context of cities, as well as to the possibility of targeted organization and possible use of them against the interests and security of Iran.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

New EU Strategy on Cooperation with the Persian Gulf, Its Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Guest Opinion: Normalization of Iran-Saudi relations with China’s mediation, which is an indication of Beijing’s more significant influence and role in new regional trends in the Middle East, increased speculations about the possibility of changes in the geostrategy of other powers.
Abbas Aslani – Expert on international relations

Foreign Policy Challenges of the New Greek Government

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the holding of the national elections in Greece on May 21, although the winning party announced priorities of its future government to be mainly improvement of the economic situation, the continuation of the national policy in foreign relations, security, and immigration would be most important challenges for this EU and NATO member country. Although the new leaders defend the continuation of the foreign and defense policy, strengthening of the country’s armed forces, creation of solid alliances, and development of the weapons program over the past four years, they differ in the field of energy exploration, the militarization of some islands in the Aegean Sea, and the issue of refugees.
Mahmoud Fazeli – International Affairs analyst

Arming Taiwan, One of the US Pressure Levers against China

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An analyst of international affairs called the provision of various types of US military-armament aid to Taiwan one of the foundations of Washington’ towards that island and said: The Chinese have intelligently realized that the US measures must be accompanied by proportionate reactions to make them fully understand that Beijing will not sit idly by the expansion of US-Taiwan relations and the increasing dispatch of US weapons to Taiwan.

What is the new position of the dollar in the global economy?

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: The confrontation between Americanization and the Chineseization of the world has created a new acting field. While the Chinese side’s efforts to reduce the international power of the dollar and increase the global acceptance of the yuan have an increasing trend, it is not possible to correctly analyze and scenarioize the possible futures of this confrontation and the new arena of acting by relying on emotional and exaggerated reactions, and of course far from scientific neutrality.
Reza Majidzadeh—Researcher of economics

Fate of Afghanistan under Shadow of Taliban-Intl. Community Conflict

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A researcher on Afghanistan affairs, criticizing the weak role and performance of the United Nations regarding Afghanistan, emphasized: The difference of views, heterogeneous and different performances of countries regarding Afghanistan, along with the weak role of the United Nations, have completed the cycle of failure and in this situation, with the increasing risk of isolation of the Taliban, their leadership is gaining more power.

Establishing Chinese order in the region is one of the strategic goals of the Islamabad meeting

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on Asian issues considered the tripartite meeting in Islamabad regarding Afghanistan as another Chinese initiative to establish peace and stability in the region by using economic tools, adding that this meeting arose from the security concerns of Pakistan and China concerning the realization of their political and economic interests in Afghanistan.

The strategic importance of resuming relations between Iran and Egypt

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: After the resumption of diplomatic relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia created a wave of positive developments in the region and encouraged other Persian Gulf countries to resume or strengthen ties with the Islamic Republic of Iran, now the news indicates that Iran and Egypt with the mediation of Iraq are trying to resume diplomatic relations.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University scholar

Strategic Importance of Organizing Legal Acceptance of Afghans in Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: Former official in charge of Afghanistan Support Headquarters at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said: Iranian people are witnessing the high and unusual presence of Afghan refugees, adding that vigilance is needed concerning their presence in the strategic context of cities, as well as to the possibility of targeted organization and possible use of them against the interests and security of Iran.

Loading