Taliban Retreat and Ambiguities in Possible Peace with America

2020/02/26 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online: Donald Trump is now in dire need of foreign accomplishments in 2020, the year of presidential elections, and if Washington can reach a deal with the Taliban and sign it, Trump could use it as bargaining chip. Pir Mohammad Molazehi - Afghanistan Affairs Expert

Taliban announced that the group’s talks with the United States are over and that the document on the peace agreement and its annexes will be finalized and signed (by the end of February). Sheila Shahin, a spokesman for the Taliban’s political bureau in Qatar, said the two sides were to issue separate statements, including a date for signing the agreement.

It seems that after 11 rounds of talks between Zalmay Khalilzad, the US special envoy for peace and the Taliban, Khalilzad has succeeded in convincing the Taliban that they cannot revive their Islamic Emirate as long as the Americans are in the country. But they have the chance to come to power by political means, accepting democratic mechanisms and by-elections (if they win). It seems that part of the Taliban, including the Quetta Council, have accepted this line of thought, and that Quetta Council has now reached an agreement with the United States.

So it can be said that an agreement in principle has been reached between the Taliban and the US, although in the last minute there may be a problem and disrupt everything but the reality is that a peace agreement is likely to be signed.

Regarding US goals of pursuing peace talks, Donald Trump from the very beginning that he entered the election campaign one of the issues he raised was why America is sustaining human and financial losses in Afghanistan and Iraq. Trump had said in his publicity slogans that if he enters the White House he would prepare the ground for the departure of Iraq and Afghanistan.

With such a track record, Donald Trump now desperately needs an outsider in the presidential election year, and if Washington can come to terms with the Taliban and signs the peace deal, Trump could use it as a bargaining chip in the upcoming presidential vote.

The Taliban, on the other hand, seek power, while they have two characteristics: First it is ethnically monopolistic and second it is ideologically monopolistic. These two traits put the Taliban in a difficult position in reaching an understanding without achieving their goals.

One of the goals the Taliban are seeking is the complete withdrawal of US and NATO troops from Afghanistan, but they appear to have shown some flexibility in this regard. So the United States is withdrawing most of its troops from Afghanistan for the purpose of election campaign publicity but it is likely that some of the US troops will remain at their bases and the Taliban have no choice but to accept it.

Another thing that remains unclear is what would be the fate of the current Kabul government? Taliban do not recognize the ruling establishment and believe it is a subservient government.

Now elections have been held in Afghanistan that depend on the outcome of the peace talks between the Taliban and the United States. That is why they have been counting the votes for several months now and disagreements are high between negotiating parties.

In this regard, General Dostum recently announced that if the election results were announced in favour of Ashraf Ghani and the Northern alliance’s line of thinking was not operationalized, they would form a parallel government in the North. This means the outbreak of civil war in Afghanistan is possible.

Given all these circumstances, the United States may implement the previous plan for the interim government to work for 18 months to reform the constitution, in which case the Taliban must also be given a share in power and assume legal status. The power structure also needs to be changed.

So at this stage, it can be imagined that an agreement between the Taliban and the United States would be operational, but behind the scenes, they might have reached a point that has not yet been announced, so it is not yet possible to say whether the Taliban have accepted for part of the US forces remain in Afghanistan or not? Or whether the Taliban accepted that the rest of the ethnic groups have a share in power? Of course, despite the uncertainties, the deal looks to be close and likely to be signed soon.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading