loader image

Legal Legitimacy of Countermeasure in Response to Assassination of Lt. General Soleimani

2020/01/07 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online: The martyrdom of the brave commander of the Islamic Ummah Lieutenant General Qassem Soleimani in a US terrorist missile attack on Friday morning has raised numerous legal questions. Dr. Ali Karbalaei Hosseini - International Law Researcher

The fact that the US regime targets a high level official of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the territory of a third country violates the most obvious principles of international law as well as the United Nations Charter. Before further analysis, let’s first examine the legal aspects of the issue:

  • Martyr Soleimani was traveling in Iraq within Iran-Iraq intergovernmental cooperation in the fight against terrorism. His field presence in Iraq was the source of charity, stability and security for the people and the ruling establishment in Iraq. The most important success in the record of this martyred commander was the elimination of ISIS terrorists in Iraq and the restoration of the land from the self-declared so-called Islamic State (Daesh). Thus, the presence of Commander Suleimani in the Iraqi territory was in coordination with and with the consent of the Baghdad government.
  • Commander Soleimani was a senior official of the Islamic Republic of Iran and naturally enjoyed the accepted and customary immunities in foreign missions.
  • The US regime, which claims to be fighting terrorism, has admitted that the US president, in consultation with the US military and security apparatus, ordered the assassination of the commander of the Qods Force. Accordingly, he pleaded guilty to perpetration, and that confession should, in any eventual court, be a place of international citation and responsibility for the Washington government.
  • Iraqi Prime Minister Adel Abdul Mahdi has stated: “Assassination of senior Iraqi officials or assassination of state officials of a friendly country is a blatant violation of Iraqi sovereignty.” Iraqi President Barham Saleh has also condemned the assassination of Qassem Soleimani, though the Iraqi government must also be accountable for its part in protecting the senior Iranian official, but it can be said that Iraq has exonerated itself from this terrorist act and has said it was unaware of the US crime.
  • On April 30, 2019, a countermeasure law was adopted in Iran against the United States declaring the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps a terrorist organization. According to this law, the US Central Command (CENTCOM), the forces and organizations or entities under its command, were declared terrorists and as a result any military or intelligence assistance to these forces to counter the IRGC and the Islamic Republic of Iran will be regarded cooperation with this terrorist action.
  • On October 2018 the Revolutionary Guards launched a rocket attack on the headquarters of the Takfiri terrorists in the eastern Euphrates (eastern Syria) in response to the ISIS terrorists attack on a parade in Ahvaz in southern Iran) on September 22 of the same year in a most vigorous and accurate manner. Iran’s decisive missile response to terrorists’ threats and actions has been accepted as a procedure, and the right of self-defense on the international stage has been met with no state opposition.

Given the above-mentioned points, it can be concluded that the US forces’ action against the late commander of the Quds Force is a terrorist act and has international implications for the US government.

Although the International Court of Justice (ICJ) has described countermeasures in international law part of a series of reprisals that have nothing to do with the use of force or armed hostilities, but it should be said that it recognizes legitimacy of countermeasures. It reaffirms that when the injured state responds to the wrongful act of another state its illegitimate aspect is abolished. The purpose of countermeasures is to protect oneself, to make the wrongdoing state comply with its obligations and to compensate the injured state. Countermeasures in accordance with Article 22 of the Draft on Responsibility of States developed by the United Nations Commission on International Law are one of the remedies of international responsibility of the state.

Accordingly, the arrest, trial and punishment of the perpetrators and agents of the crime are among the most commonly accepted countermeasures in international law that can be pursued without creating any international responsibility for the state. While such actions may seem unlikely, the US forces must be made understood that they will have no more immunity in the region, either because of the law mentioned above or because of their involvement with terrorist forces.

In addition, if we apply International Humanitarian Law, then because Iran and the US are not formally at war, then targeting an Iranian official intentionally, has a terrorist nature, so the American action could be regarded a war crime as well.

It should be borne in mind that humanitarian rights, including the four Geneva Conventions, the Additional Protocols, customary laws and other treaties in this field, prohibit, without exception, terrorist acts committed in the course of a domestic or international conflict. Humanitarian rights term major violations of the Geneva Conventions in the form of terrorist acts war crimes and oblige states to prosecute perpetrators of war crimes within the global jurisdiction at their courts; therefore, all states today must support Iran and have the responsibility to put  prosecute American terrorists and their mercenaries for their crimes.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The approach of Riyadh and Abu Dhabi in OPEC and its consequences

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An energy economics expert stated that the statements made regarding considering the UAE’s withdrawal from OPEC seem to be just a negotiating tactic, adding that disagreements have always existed in OPEC, and it is not a new issue. It is not the case that a country announces that it will leave OPEC to increase its production. Both UAE and Saudi Arabia have already produced much more than their quotas and have added to it, and they have not left OPEC either.

West’s Strategy to Contain China

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Banning the use of the Chinese application TikTok in Britain, for security reasons, is considered the last reaction of the West to China’s influence and global power-building.
Hossein Sayyahi – International politics researcher

An analysis of the political weighing process in the recent G20 summit

Strategic Council Online-Interview: An expert on European issues stated that the recent G20 summit was a demonstration of the alignment of the great and emerging powers of the world after Russia attacked Ukraine, adding that what happened in this summit demonstrated the transparency of the policies announced and applied by the members and during the summit some countries had to choose either to stand by Russia and against the West or this country.

Iran’s Defense Diplomacy, Marine Security Belt Exercise 2023

Strategic Council Online – Interview: The commander of the strategic naval forces of the army said that the 2023 marine security belt joint exercise would help to develop cooperation between the naval forces of Iran, China, and Russia, as well as increase the readiness to provide maritime security and safety jointly in line with creating peace and regional stability, announced the efforts being made to have the countries of the region participate in a marine belt exercise as well as the cooperation of the commanders of the Indian Ocean Naval Forces Symposium (IONS) for the following year.

Analysis of Iraq – Germany Energy Agreements

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: While preliminary agreements have been made regarding the export of oil and gas to Germany and Europe, Baghdad will face great challenges in realizing its ambitious goals.
Pouria Nabipour – PhD in political science and international relations

An analysis of the ineffectiveness of the international law system

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: On March 17, 2023, the International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant for Vladimir Putin, the President of Russia, and for the first time in the history of the United Nations after the Second World War, the president of a country that has a permanent membership in the Security Council and the right to veto it, is facing a sentence and criminal detention in the international criminal system; This indicates a structural change in the international law system.
Seyyed Nasrollah Ebrahimi—Associate Professor, College of Law and Political Sciences, University of Tehran

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The approach of Riyadh and Abu Dhabi in OPEC and its consequences

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An energy economics expert stated that the statements made regarding considering the UAE’s withdrawal from OPEC seem to be just a negotiating tactic, adding that disagreements have always existed in OPEC, and it is not a new issue. It is not the case that a country announces that it will leave OPEC to increase its production. Both UAE and Saudi Arabia have already produced much more than their quotas and have added to it, and they have not left OPEC either.

West’s Strategy to Contain China

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Banning the use of the Chinese application TikTok in Britain, for security reasons, is considered the last reaction of the West to China’s influence and global power-building.
Hossein Sayyahi – International politics researcher

An analysis of the political weighing process in the recent G20 summit

Strategic Council Online-Interview: An expert on European issues stated that the recent G20 summit was a demonstration of the alignment of the great and emerging powers of the world after Russia attacked Ukraine, adding that what happened in this summit demonstrated the transparency of the policies announced and applied by the members and during the summit some countries had to choose either to stand by Russia and against the West or this country.

Iran’s Defense Diplomacy, Marine Security Belt Exercise 2023

Strategic Council Online – Interview: The commander of the strategic naval forces of the army said that the 2023 marine security belt joint exercise would help to develop cooperation between the naval forces of Iran, China, and Russia, as well as increase the readiness to provide maritime security and safety jointly in line with creating peace and regional stability, announced the efforts being made to have the countries of the region participate in a marine belt exercise as well as the cooperation of the commanders of the Indian Ocean Naval Forces Symposium (IONS) for the following year.

Analysis of Iraq – Germany Energy Agreements

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: While preliminary agreements have been made regarding the export of oil and gas to Germany and Europe, Baghdad will face great challenges in realizing its ambitious goals.
Pouria Nabipour – PhD in political science and international relations

An analysis of the ineffectiveness of the international law system

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: On March 17, 2023, the International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant for Vladimir Putin, the President of Russia, and for the first time in the history of the United Nations after the Second World War, the president of a country that has a permanent membership in the Security Council and the right to veto it, is facing a sentence and criminal detention in the international criminal system; This indicates a structural change in the international law system.
Seyyed Nasrollah Ebrahimi—Associate Professor, College of Law and Political Sciences, University of Tehran

Loading