Tashkent Summit Symbolizes Fostering Convergence in Central Asia

2019/12/23 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online: Because Central Asian countries geographically do not have access to the high seas, the best way for them to keep in touch with world trade is through southern Iran, and they are interested in this route because of the security Iran enjoys. The Islamic Republic of Iran should also welcome these investments and projects, as it will be a win-win situation for both parties. Abdolreza Farajirad - University Professor and Expert on Geopolitics

The Second Central Asian Leaders’ Consultative Summit was held in Tashkent, Uzbekistan on December 11 attended by five regional leaders with the aim of continuing the convergence process with a special focus on multilateral cooperation, guaranteeing and enhancing security and stability in this part of the world

Uzbekistan President Shavkat Mirziyoyev, Kyrgyz President Sooronbai Jeenbekov, Tajik President Emomali Rahmon, Turkmenistan’s President Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedow and Chairman of the Kazakhstani Security Council and Chairman of the Kazakh Nur Otan Party Nursultan Nazarbayev were present in this summit.

Central Asia covers a vast part of the Asian continent that does not have any border with the high seas. Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Afghanistan and Mongolia are among the countries in this geographical area.

It should be noted that the Tashkent Summit was a special one, as it took place at a time when Central Asian countries were pushing past disagreements and were moving towards convergence, rapprochement, opening borders and seizing economic opportunities.

The change that has been taking place in Central Asia in recent years is not unrelated to the changes in the political structure or political management of Uzbekistan. Uzbekistan is perhaps the most important Central Asian country that has been dominated by Islam Karimov for more than 25 years. Karimov had created a closed state that had many problems with its neighbors and its own people. Ever since Shavkat Mirziyoyev came to office as Uzbekistan’s president, he has followed a completely different policy in his agenda.

Measures taken during the two or three years after Karimov’s death and the coming to office of Mirziyoyev have not been paid much attention in Iran. That is while developments in this country can serve as a model for the countries of Central Asia and the Caucasus. Mirziyoyev has concentrated on the neighboring areas, be it the Central Asian neighbors or Afghanistan and Iran. With respect to cooperation, he has also prioritized Iran and unlike Karimov who was not ready to cooperate with Tehran, the current president pursues a policy of close relations with Iran.

Mirziyoyev’s first move was to eliminate differences with Tajikistan and open the borders so that people could travel easily and without needing a visa. In fact, Uzbekistan’s policies regarding development, attention to the lower classes of the society, combating corruption and being popular have now turned into a model for other Central Asian countries.

Actually, now the Central Asian countries need to trust Mirziyoyev’s policies and moves; and meetings like the Tashkent Summit were also held by him that we have witnessed good progress there.

Also, given that Central Asian countries are on the route of (Formerly known as One Belt One Road) China’s Belt and Road Initiative, Beijing has invested heavily in these five countries, particularly Tajikistan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan. The expansion of infrastructure in these countries such as tunnels, dams and high-speed railway has led to a positive competition among Central Asian countries in terms of development, attraction of tourism and opening up to their neighbors.

Uzbekistan, on the other hand, has played a positive role in Afghan peace, and so far, two meetings have been held in Tashkent between the Taliban and the Afghan government, with Iran also attending.

Therefore, the Islamic Republic of Iran should pay more attention to developments in Central Asia and follow it closely. Because these countries are very interested in working with Iran, and under the current economic situation, Tehran can build a strong strategic relationship with them, that is Iran should pursue relations that rather than focusing only on one country, help expand its relations with the five countries.

To create such a process, first of all confidence should be built so that if there exists any irritation and estrangement between Iran and some of these countries, they would be resolved. For example, for many years Iran has failed to make a gas deal with Turkmenistan.

Uzbekistan is keen on expanding relations with Iran and is seeking to construct a railway and highway from Mazar-e-Sharif in Afghanistan towards Iran; because the Uzbeks are willing to invest in Iran’s Chabahar or Bandar Abbas.

It should be noted that because Central Asian countries geographically do not have access to free water, the best way to maintain their connection to the world trade is through southern Iran, and since security is maintained in Iran, they are interested in this route. The Islamic Republic of Iran should also welcome these investments and projects as they will benefit both parties.

If Tehran fails to seize this opportunity and cooperate with these countries, naturally other countries will replace Iran, as we have witnessed it repeatedly to this day.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Implications of the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Myanmar’s Leader

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Myanmar’s military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, is facing charges of committing crimes against humanity for the killing and persecution of Rohingya Muslims. The crimes, which affected more than a million people in Myanmar, took place between August and December 2017. During this period, the Myanmar military launched an operation called “clearance” under the pretext of fighting armed groups that led to the genocide of Muslims in Rakhine State in western Myanmar. This operation was accompanied by the widespread killing of more than 200,000 Rohingya Muslims and the displacement of about 700,000 people. The International Criminal Court has identified these actions as examples of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Implications of the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Myanmar’s Leader

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Myanmar’s military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, is facing charges of committing crimes against humanity for the killing and persecution of Rohingya Muslims. The crimes, which affected more than a million people in Myanmar, took place between August and December 2017. During this period, the Myanmar military launched an operation called “clearance” under the pretext of fighting armed groups that led to the genocide of Muslims in Rakhine State in western Myanmar. This operation was accompanied by the widespread killing of more than 200,000 Rohingya Muslims and the displacement of about 700,000 people. The International Criminal Court has identified these actions as examples of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

Loading