loader image

Tashkent Summit Symbolizes Fostering Convergence in Central Asia

2019/12/23 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online: Because Central Asian countries geographically do not have access to the high seas, the best way for them to keep in touch with world trade is through southern Iran, and they are interested in this route because of the security Iran enjoys. The Islamic Republic of Iran should also welcome these investments and projects, as it will be a win-win situation for both parties. Abdolreza Farajirad - University Professor and Expert on Geopolitics

The Second Central Asian Leaders’ Consultative Summit was held in Tashkent, Uzbekistan on December 11 attended by five regional leaders with the aim of continuing the convergence process with a special focus on multilateral cooperation, guaranteeing and enhancing security and stability in this part of the world

Uzbekistan President Shavkat Mirziyoyev, Kyrgyz President Sooronbai Jeenbekov, Tajik President Emomali Rahmon, Turkmenistan’s President Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedow and Chairman of the Kazakhstani Security Council and Chairman of the Kazakh Nur Otan Party Nursultan Nazarbayev were present in this summit.

Central Asia covers a vast part of the Asian continent that does not have any border with the high seas. Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Afghanistan and Mongolia are among the countries in this geographical area.

It should be noted that the Tashkent Summit was a special one, as it took place at a time when Central Asian countries were pushing past disagreements and were moving towards convergence, rapprochement, opening borders and seizing economic opportunities.

The change that has been taking place in Central Asia in recent years is not unrelated to the changes in the political structure or political management of Uzbekistan. Uzbekistan is perhaps the most important Central Asian country that has been dominated by Islam Karimov for more than 25 years. Karimov had created a closed state that had many problems with its neighbors and its own people. Ever since Shavkat Mirziyoyev came to office as Uzbekistan’s president, he has followed a completely different policy in his agenda.

Measures taken during the two or three years after Karimov’s death and the coming to office of Mirziyoyev have not been paid much attention in Iran. That is while developments in this country can serve as a model for the countries of Central Asia and the Caucasus. Mirziyoyev has concentrated on the neighboring areas, be it the Central Asian neighbors or Afghanistan and Iran. With respect to cooperation, he has also prioritized Iran and unlike Karimov who was not ready to cooperate with Tehran, the current president pursues a policy of close relations with Iran.

Mirziyoyev’s first move was to eliminate differences with Tajikistan and open the borders so that people could travel easily and without needing a visa. In fact, Uzbekistan’s policies regarding development, attention to the lower classes of the society, combating corruption and being popular have now turned into a model for other Central Asian countries.

Actually, now the Central Asian countries need to trust Mirziyoyev’s policies and moves; and meetings like the Tashkent Summit were also held by him that we have witnessed good progress there.

Also, given that Central Asian countries are on the route of (Formerly known as One Belt One Road) China’s Belt and Road Initiative, Beijing has invested heavily in these five countries, particularly Tajikistan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan. The expansion of infrastructure in these countries such as tunnels, dams and high-speed railway has led to a positive competition among Central Asian countries in terms of development, attraction of tourism and opening up to their neighbors.

Uzbekistan, on the other hand, has played a positive role in Afghan peace, and so far, two meetings have been held in Tashkent between the Taliban and the Afghan government, with Iran also attending.

Therefore, the Islamic Republic of Iran should pay more attention to developments in Central Asia and follow it closely. Because these countries are very interested in working with Iran, and under the current economic situation, Tehran can build a strong strategic relationship with them, that is Iran should pursue relations that rather than focusing only on one country, help expand its relations with the five countries.

To create such a process, first of all confidence should be built so that if there exists any irritation and estrangement between Iran and some of these countries, they would be resolved. For example, for many years Iran has failed to make a gas deal with Turkmenistan.

Uzbekistan is keen on expanding relations with Iran and is seeking to construct a railway and highway from Mazar-e-Sharif in Afghanistan towards Iran; because the Uzbeks are willing to invest in Iran’s Chabahar or Bandar Abbas.

It should be noted that because Central Asian countries geographically do not have access to free water, the best way to maintain their connection to the world trade is through southern Iran, and since security is maintained in Iran, they are interested in this route. The Islamic Republic of Iran should also welcome these investments and projects as they will benefit both parties.

If Tehran fails to seize this opportunity and cooperate with these countries, naturally other countries will replace Iran, as we have witnessed it repeatedly to this day.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Germany’s “New Defense Policy Guidelines”: Return of Germanic People to Age of Militarism?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: For the first time in more than a decade, Germany issued its “new defense policy guidelines,” and “Boris Pistorius,” the German Minister of Defense, asked the pillars of his country to be “ready for a war” and “capable of defense.” He has pledged to strengthen the army to become the backbone of European deterrence and collective defense.
Hamideh Safamanesh – International relations researcher

NATO’s Ambiguous Mission in Iraq New Plan for Socio-Cultural Influence

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations professor said that although NATO’s training mission for the Iraqi police forces is carried out in line with preventing ISIS from regaining power, in fact, NATO has decided to develop the scope of its mission in Iraq, noted: NATO, and the United States at its head, is looking for influence in the social body of Arab countries, especially Iraq, to advance its targets while shaping the intellectual formation and organizing the police body against the Resistance.

Consequences, Prospects of Continuation of Ground Operations of Zionist Regime in Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the continuation of the ground operations of the Zionist regime in Gaza and the success of the Hamas resistance forces in crippling their military equipment and inflicting heavy casualties on them, important questions can be raised about the prospect of that military invasion.
Hamid Khoshayand – Expert on regional affairs

France vs. Baku and Ankara in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations university professor stated that Paris is trying not to allow the situation in the Caucasus to progress as desired by the Republic of Azerbaijan and Turkey and hopes the situation can be shaped as much as possible in line with French interests through military assistance, adding: France, after Russia, is the second largest foreign investor in Armenia since 2016. This country is trying to create a rift between Armenia and Russia by strengthening ties with Armenia. France’s military support to Armenia is an important and new development that we are witnessing after the weakening of Russia’s position in Armenia.

Reasons for Ineffectiveness of Riyadh Summit Concerning Expectations of Gazans

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Recently, we witnessed an extraordinary summit of Islamic countries in Riyadh. The Palestinians, especially the people of Gaza, had built hope on the meeting, and it was expected that at the end of it, we would see a collective, serious, and deterrent decision by the Islamic countries. But, unfortunately, such expectations were not met.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University professor

France’s miscalculation to confront the resistance force in Gaza

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A former Iranian diplomat considered the French plan to create an international coalition to fight Hamas as a delusional, imaginary, and unrealistic plan, adding that this plan would increase the military presence of extra-regional forces in the Eastern Mediterranean, intensify military conflicts in the region, expand the war and internationalize it. This situation aggravates instability in the region, and of course, this is the same situation that Western countries benefit from and pursue their interests in.

Al-Aqsa Storm, Defeat of Misconceptions of Arab States about Normalization

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Israeli affairs, saying that the blow the Zionist regime has received from the “Al-Aqsa Storm” operation severely shattered the notion that the regime is an immutable reality that must be dealt with in the region noted: The crimes committed by the Zionist regime in Gaza will remain in the minds of the people of Islamic countries for a long time and will be a serious challenge for normalization.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Germany’s “New Defense Policy Guidelines”: Return of Germanic People to Age of Militarism?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: For the first time in more than a decade, Germany issued its “new defense policy guidelines,” and “Boris Pistorius,” the German Minister of Defense, asked the pillars of his country to be “ready for a war” and “capable of defense.” He has pledged to strengthen the army to become the backbone of European deterrence and collective defense.
Hamideh Safamanesh – International relations researcher

NATO’s Ambiguous Mission in Iraq New Plan for Socio-Cultural Influence

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations professor said that although NATO’s training mission for the Iraqi police forces is carried out in line with preventing ISIS from regaining power, in fact, NATO has decided to develop the scope of its mission in Iraq, noted: NATO, and the United States at its head, is looking for influence in the social body of Arab countries, especially Iraq, to advance its targets while shaping the intellectual formation and organizing the police body against the Resistance.

Consequences, Prospects of Continuation of Ground Operations of Zionist Regime in Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the continuation of the ground operations of the Zionist regime in Gaza and the success of the Hamas resistance forces in crippling their military equipment and inflicting heavy casualties on them, important questions can be raised about the prospect of that military invasion.
Hamid Khoshayand – Expert on regional affairs

France vs. Baku and Ankara in the Caucasus

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international relations university professor stated that Paris is trying not to allow the situation in the Caucasus to progress as desired by the Republic of Azerbaijan and Turkey and hopes the situation can be shaped as much as possible in line with French interests through military assistance, adding: France, after Russia, is the second largest foreign investor in Armenia since 2016. This country is trying to create a rift between Armenia and Russia by strengthening ties with Armenia. France’s military support to Armenia is an important and new development that we are witnessing after the weakening of Russia’s position in Armenia.

Reasons for Ineffectiveness of Riyadh Summit Concerning Expectations of Gazans

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Recently, we witnessed an extraordinary summit of Islamic countries in Riyadh. The Palestinians, especially the people of Gaza, had built hope on the meeting, and it was expected that at the end of it, we would see a collective, serious, and deterrent decision by the Islamic countries. But, unfortunately, such expectations were not met.
Dr. Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri – University professor

France’s miscalculation to confront the resistance force in Gaza

Strategic Council Online—Interview: A former Iranian diplomat considered the French plan to create an international coalition to fight Hamas as a delusional, imaginary, and unrealistic plan, adding that this plan would increase the military presence of extra-regional forces in the Eastern Mediterranean, intensify military conflicts in the region, expand the war and internationalize it. This situation aggravates instability in the region, and of course, this is the same situation that Western countries benefit from and pursue their interests in.

Al-Aqsa Storm, Defeat of Misconceptions of Arab States about Normalization

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Israeli affairs, saying that the blow the Zionist regime has received from the “Al-Aqsa Storm” operation severely shattered the notion that the regime is an immutable reality that must be dealt with in the region noted: The crimes committed by the Zionist regime in Gaza will remain in the minds of the people of Islamic countries for a long time and will be a serious challenge for normalization.

Loading