US Blocks EU Support for Iran Nuclear Deal!

2019/09/24 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online: A member of Iranian Parliament's National Security and Foreign Policy Committee says Europe does not have the necessary power to fulfill its bids on Iran, adding: “The truth is that European plans to keep the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) are not raised independently and are checked with the US Department of the Treasury. These schemes are not independent and therefore would be fruitless.”

Hashmatollah Falahatpisheh in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations referred to the statement of the US Treasury Department Secretary Steven Mnuchin that the French proposal of offering Iran about $15 billion in credit lines to buy Iranian oil requires US approval and that Washington did not support the offer yet. He said: “The truth is that Europe does not have the power to implement its proposals about the Islamic Republic of Iran. Regarding their latest offer to Iran they have first checked with the Americans to see if it complies with the policies of the US Treasury Department.”

He added: “I don’t think we should be optimistic about these proposals. From the beginning, the United States has adopted a unilateral policy aimed at exerting maximum pressure on the Islamic Republic and has sought to bring Iran to the negotiation table. Of course, Washington has practically failed so far but only its superpower pride has made it not to admit the defeat.”

Referring to statements made by European officials on negotiations with the aim of preserving the JCPOA, this member of the Majlis National Security Committee noted: “There is no reason to be optimistic about the plans the Europeans are announcing for the Islamic Republic of Iran. If the European plan had been put forward as an independent proposal, we could have discussed it independently, but the truth is that it has to be verified by the US Treasury and is not an independent plan and will not be effective.”

He also said: “The time is not right for negotiations and Mr. Trump has lost the chance to negotiate with Iran. When Mr. Obama came to power, in his first New Persian Year message, said he was seeking to negotiate with Iran to resolve disputes. On the contrary, when Mr. Trump became president, he spoke about containing Iran. So, Mr. Trump in the very first year lost the opportunity for negotiations, clarified his strategy and ruined the little quasi-trust that had been formed between Tehran and Washington. They (Americans) are now entering their election year and the Islamic Republic of Iran will not enter into a different atmosphere even in the name of negotiations.”

“There is only one way: Americans suspend the 915 cases of sanctions that have been gradually restored since Trump’s inauguration; that is when we can say negotiations can take place and that too just within the JCPOA. That is why the Supreme Leader has made it clear that there will be no bilateral negotiations with Washington.

He added: “I believe even if the Americans return to the JCPOA the Iranians would look at the issue with suspicion because the Americans may sit at the negotiation table to apply clauses 11 to 13 of UNSC Resolution 2231. These are the clauses to which the term “two-stage trigger mechanism” should apply. In fact, the Americans may want to rejoin the JCPOA to ruin the deal, so I believe the negotiation atmosphere is severely weakened.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading