The Kurds in the New Iraqi Power Structure

2018/12/08 | Opinion, political

Strategic Council Online - With the introduction of Adel Abdul Mahdi's Cabinet to the parliament to get a vote of confidence, the new Iraqi government was eventually formed after months of debates and challenges between Iraqi political groups.

Siamak Kakai – Iraq Affairs Expert

It is said that the share of Shiites in the government is between 50 and 60 percent, and that of the other two Sunni and Kurdish groups, is said to be about 20 percent each.

What draws attention with regard to the division of the Iraqi government’s ministerial posts is the share of the Kurds not in terms of the number of ministers, but this time the share the Iraqi Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) has gained in the new government.

It seems that the allocation of more ministerial posts to the Democratic Party is also an attempt to draw the party’s attention to a more serious and objective participation in the political structure of the new Iraqi government.

This is particularly so because the KDP had been annoyed in the process of electing a new president for Iraq. This occurred when the KDP nominee was unable to overcome the candidate of its longtime rival, the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK), and the post was handed over to Barham Salih. This upset the KDP officials who reportedly left Baghdad furiously.

Unfulfilled Expectation

Although the longstanding friendship between Iraqi Prime Minister Adel Abdul Mahdi and Massoud Barzani, KDP leader, still continues, and they are both happy with the election of Adel Abdul Mahdi, but their expectation of the presidency was not fulfilled.

Although it was the first time that the KDP had nominated an independent candidate for presidency after the Baathist regime (of Saddam Hossein was toppled), and before that, the presidency was held by PUK nominee based on an agreement with the KDP, it seems that the change in the political fabric of Kurdistan region and the diminished role and power of the president of the autonomous Kurdistan Region of Iraq held by the KDP for several terms has encouraged the KDP to seek Iraq’s presidential post.

However, the outcome of parliamentary decisions and the insistence of the Patriotic Union on the election of Barham Salih caused the KDP’s dissatisfaction and this may have led Adel Abdul Mahdi and his associates to increase the KDP’s share of the ministerial posts in order to create a balance.

Political changes in Kurdistan Region of Iraq 

In the meantime, the results of the Iraqi Kurdistan parliamentary elections also demonstrated the superiority of the Democratic Party. Out of the 111 seats, the KDP Region alone won 45 seats. Meantime, out of 11 seats went to religious and ethnic minorities. This means that the Democratic Party has won 45 seats out of 100 remaining. KDP’s old rival, the PUK has won 22 seats and the political current “change” or “Goran” won only 12 seats, and the rest of the seats went to Islamic parties and so on.

Given the political and policy changes in Iraq and the Kurdistan Region of Iraq after the separation referendum, it seems that the KDP is about to revive itself in the structure of power of the Kurdistan Region and demands more concessions in Iraq. This can affect the decision-making process on how to participate in local government.

Also, the KDP share of the local future government is not comparable to rival parties. This may affect the interaction between Kurdish parties within the Kurdistan Region of Iraq and with the central government.

That is, if the conditions of the KDP are tough, it may aggravate the scope of dissatisfaction of the PUK and other rival parties. Even some analysts do not rule out the possibility of going back to the idea of two state administration in the two Kurdish regions of Iraq, namely Erbil and Sulaimaniyah.

Therefore, the role of the Kurdistan Region of Iraq in the power structure and the longstanding debates between Baghdad and Erbil over challenging issues such as oil, disputed areas, including Kirkuk, as well as the budget, depends on the degree of solidarity of the Kurdish parties among themselves and negotiations with Baghdad.

For the same reason, KDP’s disregard for the contribution level of the PUK and other Kurdish political movements in the local government and in communicating their call to Baghdad would reduce the impact of the Kurdistan Region of Iraq.

Considering what was said, it appears that the general condition of Iraq is based on sympathy and national consensus, especially with the Kurds, in advancing the plans of the new government and state.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Redefining Diplomacy in the Digital Age

Strategic Council Online– Opinion: From the past to the present, there has been a close relationship between technology and international relations. From the introduction of the steam engine to the emergence of the telephone and radio, significant milestones were achieved that enabled faster and more direct communication, reducing the need for intermediaries and diplomatic bureaucracy. The development and deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) systems also have the potential to transform various aspects of human life, much like climate change did decades ago in the international system. The reason AI impacts the international system, particularly in diplomacy, is that politics and political issues are among the most complex human behaviors, and this complexity reaches its peak in the international arena.

Iran’s Role in the New World Order

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs analyst stated that the contemporary world is transitioning toward a multipolar order in which major powers such as the United States, China, and Russia are engaged in a complex competition to preserve or expand their global influence. In this context, Iran, as a key player in the region and the Islamic world with significant strategic capabilities—including membership in BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO)—can leverage these developments to strengthen its position.

An Analysis of South Korea’s Response to Trump’s Tariff Policy

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With Donald Trump’s return to the U.S. presidency, a new wave of economic protectionism in the form of tariff policies has impacted global trade. One of the first countries targeted by these tariffs was South Korea—a nation whose economy heavily relies on exports, particularly to the American market.

Iran’s Smart Diplomacy in Managing Regional Crises

Strategic Council Online– Interview: A West Asia affairs analyst, discussing the role of Iran’s smart diplomacy in turning regional crises into opportunities to strengthen the country’s influence and position in the region, stated: Iran’s multilateral foreign policy can be an effective alternative to Western military interventions, especially at a time when the failures of the U.S. and the Israeli regime have reduced the trust of West Asian countries in them. By consciously leveraging regional capacities and strengthening cooperation, Tehran can play a pivotal role in establishing sustainable stability in the region.

Iran’s Potential Capacity in the Large Energy Market

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An energy affairs analyst stated that the recent imposed war by the Zionist regime and the U.S. against Iran, which Donald Trump described as a military success, has disrupted energy markets and intensified concerns over rising oil prices. This event once again underscored Iran’s decisive position in the oil and gas market.

Formation of a New Regional Order Through Consolidation of Iran-Arab Relations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A senior West Asia analyst stated that The Washington Post recently emphasized in a report that the attacks by the Zionist regime and the U.S. on Iran not only failed in their strategy to isolate Tehran but also altered the perspective of Persian Gulf countries regarding regional threats, identifying the Zionists as the primary destabilizing force in the region.

Reasons for NATO Members’ Agreement to the Proposed U.S. Budget Increase

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert stated that, given the Russian threat and the rise of militarism worldwide, European countries have concluded that they must cooperate with the U.S. in establishing a unified European defense shield and strengthening NATO. Consequently, they agreed to a five percent increase in NATO’s budget during the recent summit.

Domestic Concerns and Repercussions of the 12-Day War for Trump and Netanyahu

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Every war, regardless of its duration (short or long) and how it ends (ceasefire, lifting siege, or peace), faces an issue called “The Day After.” The day after the war ends refers to the day when the consequences of the war gradually become apparent to the warring parties in various spheres, including political, military, social, economic, and others. The imposed war by the Zionist regime and America against Iran is no exception to this rule.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Redefining Diplomacy in the Digital Age

Strategic Council Online– Opinion: From the past to the present, there has been a close relationship between technology and international relations. From the introduction of the steam engine to the emergence of the telephone and radio, significant milestones were achieved that enabled faster and more direct communication, reducing the need for intermediaries and diplomatic bureaucracy. The development and deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) systems also have the potential to transform various aspects of human life, much like climate change did decades ago in the international system. The reason AI impacts the international system, particularly in diplomacy, is that politics and political issues are among the most complex human behaviors, and this complexity reaches its peak in the international arena.

Iran’s Role in the New World Order

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs analyst stated that the contemporary world is transitioning toward a multipolar order in which major powers such as the United States, China, and Russia are engaged in a complex competition to preserve or expand their global influence. In this context, Iran, as a key player in the region and the Islamic world with significant strategic capabilities—including membership in BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO)—can leverage these developments to strengthen its position.

An Analysis of South Korea’s Response to Trump’s Tariff Policy

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With Donald Trump’s return to the U.S. presidency, a new wave of economic protectionism in the form of tariff policies has impacted global trade. One of the first countries targeted by these tariffs was South Korea—a nation whose economy heavily relies on exports, particularly to the American market.

Iran’s Smart Diplomacy in Managing Regional Crises

Strategic Council Online– Interview: A West Asia affairs analyst, discussing the role of Iran’s smart diplomacy in turning regional crises into opportunities to strengthen the country’s influence and position in the region, stated: Iran’s multilateral foreign policy can be an effective alternative to Western military interventions, especially at a time when the failures of the U.S. and the Israeli regime have reduced the trust of West Asian countries in them. By consciously leveraging regional capacities and strengthening cooperation, Tehran can play a pivotal role in establishing sustainable stability in the region.

Iran’s Potential Capacity in the Large Energy Market

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An energy affairs analyst stated that the recent imposed war by the Zionist regime and the U.S. against Iran, which Donald Trump described as a military success, has disrupted energy markets and intensified concerns over rising oil prices. This event once again underscored Iran’s decisive position in the oil and gas market.

Formation of a New Regional Order Through Consolidation of Iran-Arab Relations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A senior West Asia analyst stated that The Washington Post recently emphasized in a report that the attacks by the Zionist regime and the U.S. on Iran not only failed in their strategy to isolate Tehran but also altered the perspective of Persian Gulf countries regarding regional threats, identifying the Zionists as the primary destabilizing force in the region.

Reasons for NATO Members’ Agreement to the Proposed U.S. Budget Increase

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert stated that, given the Russian threat and the rise of militarism worldwide, European countries have concluded that they must cooperate with the U.S. in establishing a unified European defense shield and strengthening NATO. Consequently, they agreed to a five percent increase in NATO’s budget during the recent summit.

Domestic Concerns and Repercussions of the 12-Day War for Trump and Netanyahu

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Every war, regardless of its duration (short or long) and how it ends (ceasefire, lifting siege, or peace), faces an issue called “The Day After.” The day after the war ends refers to the day when the consequences of the war gradually become apparent to the warring parties in various spheres, including political, military, social, economic, and others. The imposed war by the Zionist regime and America against Iran is no exception to this rule.

Loading
Samir Design Group گروه طراحی سمیر