Political perspective of 3rd Political Trend in Pakistan

2018/09/04 | Opinion, political, Publications

Strategic Council online - Although several months prior to the Pakistani parliamentary elections, it was anticipated that the two powerful parties of Pakistan, People Party (PPP) led by Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari and Muslim League-Nawaz (MLN) headed by Shahbaz Sharif will not win the elections, but it was hardly believed that a third trend will emerge in Pakistani political arena.

Mohammad Reza Asgari Moroudi – Senior Analyst in Asian Issues

In the political history of Pakistan, power has been held alternatively between two prominent political parties of PPP and MLN.

The victory of the Imran Khan-led Tehreek-e-Insaf Party (PTI) in the recent parliamentary election showed that the Pakistani people left behind other parties trusted Imran Khan and confided the responsibility of administering the country to him.

Although PTI failed to gain the majority seats in the parliament and has to coalesce with other parties in the parliament in order to set up a government, it managed to stand for the first time on the top row of parliamentary election voting list, high above other powerful parties.

Given a new approach of Imran Khan in the domestic and foreign arena which will be different from the past, the expectation has risen that the future government, led principally by PTI, will introduce new policies in both areas.

Imran Khan’s remarks at the first news conference after his victory revealed that he is going to pursue new policies in contrary to the established ones, which according to the PTI leader, could be a turning point in Pakistan’s history.

Fighting against corruption at all levels was Imran Khan’s most significant promise during the election campaign, a motto that encouraged the Pakistani people to cast their vote in favor of his party.

Iran-Pakistan future relations

Also, by scrutinizing Pakistan foreign policy of the past two decades and raising issues about the structure and quality of the country’s relations with its neighbors and certain transnational actors, Imran Khan has promised changes in Islamabad’s diplomatic strategies.

The insistence of the PTI leader on expanding relations with Tehran indicates his robust determination to strengthen cooperation with Iran because of Tehran’s honest role in helping to provide security in the region and also due to Iran’s status as a reliable trade and economic partner for Islamabad.

 As a major energy producer in the world, Iran can play a decisive role in supplying the required energy for Pakistan. It is for the same reason and due to various political considerations that Imran Khan believes that development of relations between Pakistan and Iran is inevitable and has pinned hope to Iran in supplying Pakistan’s sustainable energy to help Islamabad to exit its energy crisis.

Considering the status quo, it is anticipated that the future Pakistani government under PTI leadership will take steps towards developing relations with Iran, particularly in carrying out the gas pipeline project which stopped by the previous governments under the pressure of the United States.

Another key issue in bilateral relations is terrorist attacks along the common borders from the Pakistan territory into Iran which the future Islamabad government is expected to take effective measures to root out the threats and create greater convergence in jointly providing security.

Opposition to the US unilateral policies

As for the future of Pakistan’s relations with the US, with regard to Imran Khan’s positions of previous years, especially his opposition to the US unilateral policies such as US drone attacks on the tribal areas of Pakistan, it is speculated that he is willing to adopt policies independent of Washington and focus on securing national interests.

On future relations with Afghanistan, Imran Khan offered a position different from the past which could be interpreted as a fundamental change.

Contrary to what former Pakistani officials believed in describing the country as the principal victim of terrorism in the region, Imran Khan chose a different approach, considering Afghanistan as the greatest victim of extremism, a position which could have a meaningful impact on creating a positive psychological atmosphere in the tense relations between Kabul and Islamabad.

From the viewpoint of Imran Khan, the challenges and tensions in Pakistani relations with its neighbors led to heavy costs for the country, and once Islamabad’s foreign policy takes the path of détente, the Pakistani government can further focus on domestic affairs, especially on putting the country’s economy in order.

Based on such valuable considerations, the leaders of Afghanistan and India welcomed the victory of the PTI party in the Pakistani parliamentary election, and Afghan President Mohammed Ashraf Ghani invited Imran Khan to visit Afghanistan.

The Afghan government believes that Pakistan plays an important role in the success or failure of the Kabul plan in fighting or negotiating with the Taliban as the main armed group opposing the Kabul government, and it will not be possible to establish peace in Afghanistan unless Islamabad aligns its policies with those of Kabul.

Also, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi congratulated Imran Khan in a phone call and welcomed the expansion of bilateral ties.

Conclusion

Under these circumstances, it is expected that Imran Khan who plans to introduce a new arrangement in coalition with some other parties consisting of foreign policy decision-makers, will be able to encourage the Pakistani army to cooperate with him in pursuit of materializing his ideals in a new era of building trust in the diplomatic arena. In this context, the Saudis will do their utmost to align Pakistan with its positions on regional issues, including distancing from Iran, although it seems that geopolitical status of Islamabad-Tehran and their common interests will prevent Riyadh from implementing its policies.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Implications of the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Myanmar’s Leader

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Myanmar’s military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, is facing charges of committing crimes against humanity for the killing and persecution of Rohingya Muslims. The crimes, which affected more than a million people in Myanmar, took place between August and December 2017. During this period, the Myanmar military launched an operation called “clearance” under the pretext of fighting armed groups that led to the genocide of Muslims in Rakhine State in western Myanmar. This operation was accompanied by the widespread killing of more than 200,000 Rohingya Muslims and the displacement of about 700,000 people. The International Criminal Court has identified these actions as examples of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Implications of the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Myanmar’s Leader

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Myanmar’s military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, is facing charges of committing crimes against humanity for the killing and persecution of Rohingya Muslims. The crimes, which affected more than a million people in Myanmar, took place between August and December 2017. During this period, the Myanmar military launched an operation called “clearance” under the pretext of fighting armed groups that led to the genocide of Muslims in Rakhine State in western Myanmar. This operation was accompanied by the widespread killing of more than 200,000 Rohingya Muslims and the displacement of about 700,000 people. The International Criminal Court has identified these actions as examples of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

Loading