Manama Conference: Another Betrayal of Palestinian Nation!

2019/06/08 | News, Opinion

Strategic Council Online: Part of the approach of the Manama international economic “workshop” called “Peace to Prosperity” is to monitor the implementation of the new scheme for the Middle East.

The White House has announced that the US will hold an international economic “workshop” in Bahrain in late June, seeking to encourage investment in the Palestinian territories. The conference, to be managed by Jared Kushner, the presidential son-in-law could be important in some ways because it is directly related to the Palestinian issue and the future of the Middle East. With this in mind, the question now is: what are the goals of this conference and what is the general agenda of its organizers?

Considering the importance of this issue, West Asian affairs expert Hassan Hanizadeh discussed the reasons and goals for holding the event in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations.

 

Q: What is your assessment of the Manama conference and what is the aim of this meeting?

The US-sponsored conference called “Peace to Prosperity”, is considered a complement to the practical implementation of the “Deal of the Century”. Given that Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Bahrain, the three Persian Gulf Cooperation Council member states have made extensive efforts to help implement the “Deal of the Century”, and since Bahrain has established open relations with the Zionist regime, the Manama conference will be held with two goals. First, to remove obstacles on the way of Arab-Israeli relations; In other words, the conference will provide the preliminaries of the establishment of relations between the Arab states in political and economic spheres.

The event, in fact, aims at the implementation of the new Middle East scheme of Shimon Peres, the former head of the Zionist regime. According to Shimon Peres new Middle East plan, the volume of trade and economic exchanges between the six Persian Gulf Cooperation Council states and the Zionist regime will amount to $70 billion a year by 2020. So part of the “Peace to Prosperity” economic conference in Bahrain is to monitor implementation of the new Middle East scheme. Another issue on the agenda of the conference is the operation of the “Deal of the Century”. The deal is to be implemented in 2019 in cooperation with the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council states under the guidance and management of the United States and the Zionist regime. Because US President Donald Trump needs a propaganda campaign to win the 2020 US presidential election, and therefore Trump is pushing for the implementation of the plan.

 

Q: What are the Arab countries seeking to gain by supporting this scheme?

The plan to forge economic cooperation between the PGCC and the Zionist regime is pursued with a number of goals: First, to harm the Iranian economy and the so-called political isolation of Tehran in the sense that the Persian Gulf will become a market for Israeli goods in the future to prevent exports of Iranian goods to the Persian Gulf.

Meanwhile, the six countries, in particular, Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Bahrain, have come to the conclusion that they must use Israeli political and military capabilities to protect themselves. Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Bahrain not only have not helped the Palestinian people in recent years, but they have earmarked $80 million to the Zionist regime to help the Likud Party, especially Benjamin Netanyahu, to win the recent Israeli election.

 

Q: What are the strategic effects of these measures by Arabs and their support for Israel and America?

The Arab countries, especially the Persian Gulf states, are not required to support the Palestinian people. Many officials from the UAE, Bahrain and Saudi Arabia have explicitly stated that the Palestinian issue and political and financial assistance to Palestine have reduced the development of the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council and, therefore, they should not spend any more money in support of the Palestinian people. But in reality, these measures are tantamount to compromising the rights of the Palestinian people and unquestionably a betrayal of the Palestinian cause.

 

Q: What scenarios can be foreseen for the future of these developments, including the Deal of the Century?

Arab countries are not expected to take action to stop the execution of the Deal of the Century. The Arab states are now divided into three parts as regards their position concerning the Deal of the Century; countries that sponsor the plan, such as Saudi Arabia, the Emirates and Bahrain; relatively neutral states, such as Oman, Kuwait, Qatar, Tunisia, Algeria, Egypt, Jordan and Sudan, which have little involvement in this issue; among the Arab countries only Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Yemen are opposed to this plan.

Regarding the approach of the Palestinian people, all Islamic and national political movements and even the PA are opposed to the implementation of this plan and will confront it. Therefore, the Palestinian people and Jihadist movements will strongly confront this plan, even if this opposition leads to physical conflict between the Palestinians and the Israeli regime.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Implications of the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Myanmar’s Leader

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Myanmar’s military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, is facing charges of committing crimes against humanity for the killing and persecution of Rohingya Muslims. The crimes, which affected more than a million people in Myanmar, took place between August and December 2017. During this period, the Myanmar military launched an operation called “clearance” under the pretext of fighting armed groups that led to the genocide of Muslims in Rakhine State in western Myanmar. This operation was accompanied by the widespread killing of more than 200,000 Rohingya Muslims and the displacement of about 700,000 people. The International Criminal Court has identified these actions as examples of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Implications of the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Myanmar’s Leader

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Myanmar’s military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, is facing charges of committing crimes against humanity for the killing and persecution of Rohingya Muslims. The crimes, which affected more than a million people in Myanmar, took place between August and December 2017. During this period, the Myanmar military launched an operation called “clearance” under the pretext of fighting armed groups that led to the genocide of Muslims in Rakhine State in western Myanmar. This operation was accompanied by the widespread killing of more than 200,000 Rohingya Muslims and the displacement of about 700,000 people. The International Criminal Court has identified these actions as examples of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

Loading