Analysis of Causes for OPEC+ Decision to Cut Oil Production, Its Consequences

2023/04/09 | Economy, interview, top news

Strategic Council Online - Interview: An expert on Saudi affairs stated that concerning the considerations the oil-producing countries had about the drop in oil prices, the decision to reduce supply by OPEC+ was probable. He added: Bin Salman, with bitter experiences in the past, emphasizes that the US should give special privileges to Saudi Arabia in exchange for lowering the price of oil, removing the pressure and considering the interests of that country.

In an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, Amin Parto pointed to the OPEC+ decision to reduce its production by 1.16 million barrels of oil despite the announcement of the US opposition to the conclusion, adding: Last month, oil prices fell by as much as 70 dollars per barrel due to concerns about reduced demand caused by the global banking crisis. Although this price increased to 80 dollars per barrel after that, the demand for energy consumption will decrease with the end of the winter and cold season, and the oil price is expected to fall.

Saying that all the producers, especially Saudi Arabia, welcomed the decision to reduce production, he pointed out the positions of countries regarding the decision of OPEC+ to reduce output and continued: Saudi Arabia is generally trying not to politicize oil production. However, under the current situation, the country seeks to show the independence of its opinion and will to the US. Riyadh has demonstrated that it does not want to be influenced by the pressures of the West to manage energy prices during the war in Ukraine and move in line with the US policy to reduce Russia’s income.

The analyst of Saudi affairs stated that another factor in OPEC+’s decision to reduce oil supply was the neutralization of the drop in oil prices following the agreement between Tehran and Riyadh and said: Saudi Arabia announced that this voluntary reduction in production is a preventive measure aimed at supporting market stability. Forecasts by energy market analysts show that this reduction could push the oil price above 100 dollars per barrel this year, which may reach 110 dollars in the summer.

Parto referred to the release of the strategic oil reserves of the United States and France and Washington’s refusal to fill those reserves in the 2023 fiscal year, as well as the US administration’s concern about the consequences of rising oil prices on curbing current inflation in countries affected by inflationary pressure and added: Considering the possibilities that the oil-producing countries had regarding the price drop, the decision to reduce the supply seemed likely. Especially the non-OPEC producers do not see themselves as bound to consider the balance in the supply and demand market. Because of this, OPEC+ was forced to reduce production again.

Referring to Saudi Arabia’s role in the decision to reduce OPEC+ oil production, he noted: Riyadh has considered a limit of profit for its economy. Considering that the policies and approaches of Saudi Arabia are not comparable to 10 years ago, it prioritizes profit for itself over anything else. Saudi Arabia does not want the oil to fall below 80 dollars because economic costs and the implementation of development programs require keeping the oil price at a certain level. A one-dollar drop in oil prices for Saudi Arabia, which produces about 10 million barrels of oil per day, will mean an annual loss of about four billion dollars.

This expert on Saudi affairs emphasized: In the current situation, oil has a more important place and importance for Riyadh and economic profit than the political influence of that country. For this reason, the acceptance of the decision to reduce oil production by that country was predictable.

Parto referred to the reaction of the White House and calling it irrational to reduce oil production and stated: The Democrats need the economic satisfaction of the people in this situation; in addition, the increase in energy prices for the US, especially about the efforts to increase economic growth in post-COVID conditions, brings an increase in inflation.

Regarding the news published in connection with the UAE’s criticism of Saudi Arabia’s policies for not accompanying the United States and emphasizing the reduction in oil production, as well as the possibility of the country leaving OPEC+ following the continuation of this reduction, he said: Increasing production will generate more income for the UAE. However, Abu Dhabi does not seem to have such a decision, and there is little possibility for the UAE to leave OPEC+ for several reasons. The UAE does not have the same position in the oil market as Saudi Arabia, Russia, the US, or Canada. This country is more interested in gaining prestige and creating alliances.

Parto explained: While maintaining its position in OPEC, the UAE is trying to create various lobbies and alliances to balance with Saudi Arabia. Qatar’s withdrawal from OPEC was due to its low production, and it did not have an influential presence. Still, the UAE does not have such a situation because if the UAE wants to be effective in the global oil market, this position will be possible with its presence in OPEC.

The analyst of Saudi affairs stated that the UAE does not want its relations with Saudi Arabia to become complicated and challenging and tries to manage the differences, adding: Abu Dhabi has gained many benefits from its association with Riyadh in the past years, and at the same time, it has caused harm, dangers and challenges to Saudi Arabia. Among other things, we have witnessed this approach in the case of Yemen, the establishment of a military base in that country, and efforts to establish a relationship with the Zionist regime. Now that they have reached problems with each other regarding Yemen, Iran, Abraham Accords, influence, and economic status, withdrawal from OPEC will worsen their relationship and deepen their differences.

While explaining other consequences of the OPEC+ oil production cut, he pointed to the remarks of an American official who said: ‘We do not agree with Saudi Arabia on all issues, but we are partners in all issues,’ and continued: Although Saudi Arabia is trying to hit the Democrats in the US and sees the presence of the Republicans more to its advantage, Bin Salman, with his bitter experiences in the past, emphasizes that in exchange for lowering the price of oil, the US should give special privileges to Saudi Arabia, remove the pressure from Saudi Arabia and consider the interests of that country. Although the Saudis do not violate their red lines in relations with the US, they pursue their interests independently and more seriously than before.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

A New Chapter Awaits Tehran-Riyadh Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The visit of Saudi Defense Minister Khalid bin Salman to Iran, the presentation of the message of the Saudi King to the Supreme Leader of the Revolution, and the meeting with high-ranking officials of the Islamic Republic of Iran, in addition to playing an effective role in strengthening and consolidating bilateral relations, can be effective in providing the necessary platforms and conditions for advancing collective cooperation in the region.

New Regional Order and the Requirement of Pathology of Iran’s Strategy

Strategic Council Online – Guest Note: After the developments in Syria and the challenges that the Axis of Resistance has faced, policymakers and analysts have decided to present a new representation of the Middle East regional order and consider new dimensions in their decision-making. The change and new combination of cooperation and alliances indicate an understanding of changes in the regional order. As a result, we are witnessing a change in strategies, which also requires changing their type of action and approach.

Tariff War and Escalation of Tension in China-US Relations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: The Secretary-General of the Iran-China Strategic Studies Institute believes that following the tariff war between China and the US, relations between Washington and Beijing face a turbulent outlook during the Trump era.

Consequences of the Trump Administration’s Trade War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The consequences of Trump’s trade war, which is unprecedented and new and has apparently been implemented to ” support domestic production” in the United States and “balance global trade,” are gradually becoming apparent.

Analysis: Egypt’s Approach to the Gaza Crisis

Strategic Council Online Opinion: Egypt’s foreign policy towards West Asia, especially in matters related to Gaza, is influenced by complex strategic factors that include national security, relations with global powers, and the country’s role in regional developments.

Analysis of the China-US Tariff War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: China expects the “Made in China 2025” strategy to be completed and realized this year. On the other hand, the United States sees its supposed hegemony in danger and is trying to maintain its position.
In this situation and as one of the means of confrontation, the trade war has intensified again, as was the experience of the 2016-2020 period, and in the most recent action, China and the United States have increased tariffs on each other’s agricultural products; China by 15 percent and the United States by 20 percent. Will this ping-pong lead to a trade agreement, or will the trade war intensify?

Prospects for US Attacks on Ansar Allah

strategic Council Online – Opinion: After more than three weeks of military aggression and unprecedented and widespread bombing of various cities in Yemen, the US government has not yet gained significant and strategic achievements in line with its declared goals.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

A New Chapter Awaits Tehran-Riyadh Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The visit of Saudi Defense Minister Khalid bin Salman to Iran, the presentation of the message of the Saudi King to the Supreme Leader of the Revolution, and the meeting with high-ranking officials of the Islamic Republic of Iran, in addition to playing an effective role in strengthening and consolidating bilateral relations, can be effective in providing the necessary platforms and conditions for advancing collective cooperation in the region.

New Regional Order and the Requirement of Pathology of Iran’s Strategy

Strategic Council Online – Guest Note: After the developments in Syria and the challenges that the Axis of Resistance has faced, policymakers and analysts have decided to present a new representation of the Middle East regional order and consider new dimensions in their decision-making. The change and new combination of cooperation and alliances indicate an understanding of changes in the regional order. As a result, we are witnessing a change in strategies, which also requires changing their type of action and approach.

Tariff War and Escalation of Tension in China-US Relations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: The Secretary-General of the Iran-China Strategic Studies Institute believes that following the tariff war between China and the US, relations between Washington and Beijing face a turbulent outlook during the Trump era.

Consequences of the Trump Administration’s Trade War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The consequences of Trump’s trade war, which is unprecedented and new and has apparently been implemented to ” support domestic production” in the United States and “balance global trade,” are gradually becoming apparent.

Analysis: Egypt’s Approach to the Gaza Crisis

Strategic Council Online Opinion: Egypt’s foreign policy towards West Asia, especially in matters related to Gaza, is influenced by complex strategic factors that include national security, relations with global powers, and the country’s role in regional developments.

Analysis of the China-US Tariff War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: China expects the “Made in China 2025” strategy to be completed and realized this year. On the other hand, the United States sees its supposed hegemony in danger and is trying to maintain its position.
In this situation and as one of the means of confrontation, the trade war has intensified again, as was the experience of the 2016-2020 period, and in the most recent action, China and the United States have increased tariffs on each other’s agricultural products; China by 15 percent and the United States by 20 percent. Will this ping-pong lead to a trade agreement, or will the trade war intensify?

Prospects for US Attacks on Ansar Allah

strategic Council Online – Opinion: After more than three weeks of military aggression and unprecedented and widespread bombing of various cities in Yemen, the US government has not yet gained significant and strategic achievements in line with its declared goals.

Loading
Samir Design Group گروه طراحی سمیر