The approach of Riyadh and Abu Dhabi in OPEC and its consequences

2023/03/29 | Economy, Note, top news

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An energy economics expert stated that the statements made regarding considering the UAE's withdrawal from OPEC seem to be just a negotiating tactic, adding that disagreements have always existed in OPEC, and it is not a new issue. It is not the case that a country announces that it will leave OPEC to increase its production. Both UAE and Saudi Arabia have already produced much more than their quotas and have added to it, and they have not left OPEC either.

Narsi Qorban told the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations that the news by the Wall Street Journal on UAE’s consideration of exiting OPEC was denied, adding that the UAE is not considering this due to deepening gap and difference with Saudi Arabia over foreign investment, oil and the war in Yemen.

He added that with the publication of the report on the possible exit of the UAE from OPEC, the price of Brent oil decreased by 2.8 percent, which, of course, was offset by the immediate denial of the UAE. Previously, the UAE has announced publicly and privately that it adheres to the agreement of OPEC+ coalition members to reduce daily supply by 2 million barrels, which will remain in force until the end of 2023.

Recalling that speculations about leaving OPEC and the OPEC+ alliance by the UAE go back at least two years, he explained the differences between Riyadh and Abu Dhabi regarding the war in Yemen. He added that Abu Dhabi wants to maintain its position on the southern coast of Yemen and dominate the Red Sea. Additionally, this country seeks to establish a military base on an island in the Bab al-Mandeb Strait at the southern end of the Red Sea, and Saudi Arabia has opposed these goals.

This energy economy expert said that the UAE is one of the essential OPEC members, the third largest producer of this organization after Saudi Arabia and Iraq, and one of the few OPEC member countries that does not fully use its production capacity. Considering that OPEC, Russia, and other non-member countries in the OPEC+ alliance signed an agreement to reduce production by 2 million barrels, which includes about 2 percent of the global oil demand, it seems that the UAE is willing to advance its oil production and sales plans according to its national interests.

At the same time, referring to the withdrawal of Qatar from OPEC in 2019, Qorban reminded that Qatar’s exit from OPEC was not due to political differences and issues. Still, Doha wanted to focus more on gas production and export, while this country had limited oil production. The UAE currently has high oil production, so deciding to leave OPEC will not be easy.

He added that the UAE needs OPEC, and OPEC also needs UAE. As a result, the issues raised are only speculations, and it seems that the UAE is looking to get more points from Saudi Arabia or other parties in OPEC.

This energy economy analyst pointed to a Wall Street Journal report that stated that the UAE supported OPEC+ in public circles. Still, Saudi officials said that the Emiratis told them in behind-the-scenes meetings that they wanted more oil production per Washington’s request. He stated that differences of opinion have always existed in OPEC, and it is not a new issue. It is not the case that a country can increase its production only by leaving OPEC. Both UAE and Saudi Arabia have already produced much more than their quotas and have added to it, and they have not left OPEC either.

The Abu Dhabi National Oil Company announced a daily production target of 5 million barrels by 2027. Qorban said that the UAE initially wanted to increase its production base from 3.2 million barrels to 3.8 million daily. Still, according to its agreement with Saudi Arabia, Abu Dhabi increased its production base level to 3.65 million barrels per day from April 2022. Although this agreement was reached, the gap between the two countries with economic and geopolitical competition still stands out.

He said that the recent agreement between Iran and Saudi Arabia would bring about changes in the region, adding that this is not the first time that the dispute between Saudi Arabia and the UAE in oil fields has arisen. Instead, in July 2021, the UAE also opposed Saudi Arabia’s proposal to increase production by two million barrels per day, a proposal that Riyadh had presented to compensate for the economic recession caused by the spread of the Coronavirus. At that time, the Saudi oil minister, without naming the UAE, strongly criticized the UAE and called for rational and equal decisions.

Emphasizing that the statements of UAE officials to consider leaving OPEC are only negotiation tactics, this energy economy expert said that the UAE has a quota in OPEC and can increase its production. Indeed, the quotas are not the reasons for leaving OPEC; if they were, Saudi Arabia should have left OPEC sooner; Because this country had a high production capacity and has been producing less than this capacity for years.

Regarding the possibility of the UAE insisting on this lever of pressure in the event of an increase in political tension with Saudi Arabia, Qorban said that the differences between the UAE and Saudi Arabia have gradually become more public in the past years; There are many regional issues, and now the UAE is worried that it will be left out of the consultations on the future of Yemen. However, the oil issue is one of the issues between Saudi Arabia and the UAE, and these two countries cooperate in many other cases. They also have competition with each other, and there has been this competition and cooperation in the past. It seems that these two countries are in a competition-cooperation situation, and this cooperation will bring more benefits for both countries.

He emphasized that due to the production of more or less oil, the UAE will not go in the direction of creating a crisis in its relations with its neighbors or in regional organizations. In any case, the disadvantages and harms of leaving OPEC for the UAE outweigh the benefits it enjoys now.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

Loading