The West’s attempt to impose a Russian energy embargo and its prospects

2022/06/08 | Economy, interview, top news

Strategic Council Online-Interview: "Even if European countries put the issue of sanctions on Russia's oil on the agenda seriously, they do not seem to be able to put it into practice such sanctions," said a professor of political economy.

Alireza Soltani told the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations that despite the Russian government’s reliance on certain mechanisms, monetary, financial, and banking sanctions appear to have had many challenges for the Russians, with negative consequences for the devaluation of the national currency.

He said sanctions on Russia could be divided into economy and energy sectors, referring to the efforts of Europe to reduce dependency on Russia’s energy.

He said the power of Europe to impose sanctions on Russia’s oil and gas sectors are difference, adding that in practice, the European Union has no intention of boycotting the purchase of Russian gas, because the economy of Europe and many European countries is dependent on Russian gas, and any disruption in the transfer of its gas to Europe poses a great challenge to the European economy; So the Europeans are not looking to talk to the Russians about buying gas.

This political economy university professor said what is most at stake in Europe is Russia’s embargo on gas exports to Europe, which could halt or reduce Moscow’s gas supply if the Europeans increase their economic pressure on Russia. Hence, they are looking for alternative ways.

Referring to the negotiations among European countries to find solutions to cut dependency on Russia’s gas, he said the Russians are also not open to using gas tools to put pressure on Europe; Because, in any case, this forces the Europeans to go more quickly and seriously to supply the gas they need from sources and sources other than Russia; So in order not to provoke the Europeans into changing the basis of their gas supply, the Russians have not maneuvered much in the current situation, and it seems unlikely that they will want to use the gas tool effectively.

“The European Union (EU) has announced another plan to put pressure on Russia, including a boycott of Russian oil. Since the beginning of the Ukraine war, the EU has focused on oil sanctions as a powerful tool that could force the Russians to strain by buying oil from Russia if the crisis and Ukraine military aggression continue, but despite more than two months since Russia’s military invasion of Ukraine, the European Union has not yet succeeded in implementing this policy in a coherent manner,” he said, adding that Russia’s move to invade Ukraine and annex Crimea has prompted Europe to seek to reduce its unilateral dependence on European gas.

Referring to opposition by Hungary in adopting the sixth sanctions package against Russia, he said Hungarian officials have lamented Europe’s inattention to its problems with cutting off Russian oil imports, calling it costly for their country and comparing it to dropping an atomic bomb on the Hungarian economy. Although in practice some European countries have reduced their oil purchases from Russia, this has not been under the heading of a Russian oil embargo.

He said that the head of the European Commission also said that there was little chance of an agreement between the 27 EU member states on a ban on Russian oil imports, adding that it seems that the Europeans are now looking for options to finalize the sixth package of sanctions, one of the most important of which is to abandon the idea of ​​banning the import of Russian oil and petroleum products and to continue other programs in the package of sanctions.

“Despite efforts to hurt Russia’s economy and cut off its revenues, Moscow’s oil and gas revenues have been steadily rising since the start of the war, reaching a record high of 1.8 trillion rubles, or more than 27 billion dollars setting a new record in April,” he said, adding that the consequences of reducing the purchase of Russian oil would be felt in the long term and would result in rising oil prices.

He said that European efforts have prompted Russians to seek new marketing for their oil shipments, adding that naturally, Asian markets, especially China and India, are new markets in which the Russians are counting, and in this turbulent and complex market, they are being offered their oil cheaper than the market price. This has also created problems for Iranian oil, as the Russians try to take over the informal markets held by Iran to sell their surplus oil.

He added that even if European countries take the issue of Russia’s oil embargo seriously on the agenda, it does not seem to be implemented in practice, and Russia has received the necessary message in this regard.

Asked about the deal between Germany and Qatar to purchase oil as of 2024, he said Russian supplies 45 percent of Germany’s gas needs, but Qatar has said it will not supply all of its gas to Germany. Germany has allocated 3 billion dollars to acquire four floating gas receiving terminals, and France and Italy are considering similar options. In fact, European countries are considering several alternatives to buy gas, one of the most important of which is Qatar, which will do it through LNG terminals.

He said that the Europeans can also consider Iranian gas, although it faces obstacles; Of course, Algeria and North Africa are also considered; However, Europe do not seem to be able to impose serious and effective energy sanctions on Russia.

“At least in the short term, this is not possible for Europe, as some technical issues do not allow them to move quickly in this direction and find alternatives to Russian oil. Changing energy export lines is very expensive and not easy. In fact, energy sanctions are inaccessible to Europe, but they have been effective in the monetary and banking spheres, as they have been so far”.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

An Analysis of South Korea’s Response to Trump’s Tariff Policy

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With Donald Trump’s return to the U.S. presidency, a new wave of economic protectionism in the form of tariff policies has impacted global trade. One of the first countries targeted by these tariffs was South Korea—a nation whose economy heavily relies on exports, particularly to the American market.

Iran’s Smart Diplomacy in Managing Regional Crises

Strategic Council Online– Interview: A West Asia affairs analyst, discussing the role of Iran’s smart diplomacy in turning regional crises into opportunities to strengthen the country’s influence and position in the region, stated: Iran’s multilateral foreign policy can be an effective alternative to Western military interventions, especially at a time when the failures of the U.S. and the Israeli regime have reduced the trust of West Asian countries in them. By consciously leveraging regional capacities and strengthening cooperation, Tehran can play a pivotal role in establishing sustainable stability in the region.

Iran’s Potential Capacity in the Large Energy Market

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An energy affairs analyst stated that the recent imposed war by the Zionist regime and the U.S. against Iran, which Donald Trump described as a military success, has disrupted energy markets and intensified concerns over rising oil prices. This event once again underscored Iran’s decisive position in the oil and gas market.

Formation of a New Regional Order Through Consolidation of Iran-Arab Relations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A senior West Asia analyst stated that The Washington Post recently emphasized in a report that the attacks by the Zionist regime and the U.S. on Iran not only failed in their strategy to isolate Tehran but also altered the perspective of Persian Gulf countries regarding regional threats, identifying the Zionists as the primary destabilizing force in the region.

Reasons for NATO Members’ Agreement to the Proposed U.S. Budget Increase

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert stated that, given the Russian threat and the rise of militarism worldwide, European countries have concluded that they must cooperate with the U.S. in establishing a unified European defense shield and strengthening NATO. Consequently, they agreed to a five percent increase in NATO’s budget during the recent summit.

Domestic Concerns and Repercussions of the 12-Day War for Trump and Netanyahu

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Every war, regardless of its duration (short or long) and how it ends (ceasefire, lifting siege, or peace), faces an issue called “The Day After.” The day after the war ends refers to the day when the consequences of the war gradually become apparent to the warring parties in various spheres, including political, military, social, economic, and others. The imposed war by the Zionist regime and America against Iran is no exception to this rule.

Objectives of Western Military Support Escalation for the Zionist Regime After the Ceasefire with Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A West Asia affairs expert stated that following the imposition of a ceasefire on the Zionist regime on June 23, 2025, after its military aggression against Iran, reports from Arab sources indicate the arrival of 17 heavy transport aircraft carrying military equipment from the United States and Germany to the Occupied Territories. This move, which the Iraqi media “Naya” describes as part of Western efforts to rebuild the Zionist regime’s military capabilities after heavy losses in the 12-day war with Iran, poses a serious threat to regional peace and Iran’s nuclear negotiations.

Netanyahu’s Tactics to Evade Trial Under Pretext of Security and Regional Developments

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An Israeli regime affairs researcher stated: The Zionist regime media recently announced that Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of this regime, has requested a two-week postponement of his trial for security reasons and regional developments. On Sunday, news also emerged that the “Occupied Jerusalem” district court agreed to postpone Netanyahu’s trial by one week. This decision followed the Zionist regime Prime Minister summoning officials from the Foreign Intelligence Service (Mossad) and Military Intelligence Organization (Aman) to a confidential session held at this court to explain the reasons for his request to delay his trial by two weeks.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

An Analysis of South Korea’s Response to Trump’s Tariff Policy

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With Donald Trump’s return to the U.S. presidency, a new wave of economic protectionism in the form of tariff policies has impacted global trade. One of the first countries targeted by these tariffs was South Korea—a nation whose economy heavily relies on exports, particularly to the American market.

Iran’s Smart Diplomacy in Managing Regional Crises

Strategic Council Online– Interview: A West Asia affairs analyst, discussing the role of Iran’s smart diplomacy in turning regional crises into opportunities to strengthen the country’s influence and position in the region, stated: Iran’s multilateral foreign policy can be an effective alternative to Western military interventions, especially at a time when the failures of the U.S. and the Israeli regime have reduced the trust of West Asian countries in them. By consciously leveraging regional capacities and strengthening cooperation, Tehran can play a pivotal role in establishing sustainable stability in the region.

Iran’s Potential Capacity in the Large Energy Market

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An energy affairs analyst stated that the recent imposed war by the Zionist regime and the U.S. against Iran, which Donald Trump described as a military success, has disrupted energy markets and intensified concerns over rising oil prices. This event once again underscored Iran’s decisive position in the oil and gas market.

Formation of a New Regional Order Through Consolidation of Iran-Arab Relations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A senior West Asia analyst stated that The Washington Post recently emphasized in a report that the attacks by the Zionist regime and the U.S. on Iran not only failed in their strategy to isolate Tehran but also altered the perspective of Persian Gulf countries regarding regional threats, identifying the Zionists as the primary destabilizing force in the region.

Reasons for NATO Members’ Agreement to the Proposed U.S. Budget Increase

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert stated that, given the Russian threat and the rise of militarism worldwide, European countries have concluded that they must cooperate with the U.S. in establishing a unified European defense shield and strengthening NATO. Consequently, they agreed to a five percent increase in NATO’s budget during the recent summit.

Domestic Concerns and Repercussions of the 12-Day War for Trump and Netanyahu

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Every war, regardless of its duration (short or long) and how it ends (ceasefire, lifting siege, or peace), faces an issue called “The Day After.” The day after the war ends refers to the day when the consequences of the war gradually become apparent to the warring parties in various spheres, including political, military, social, economic, and others. The imposed war by the Zionist regime and America against Iran is no exception to this rule.

Objectives of Western Military Support Escalation for the Zionist Regime After the Ceasefire with Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A West Asia affairs expert stated that following the imposition of a ceasefire on the Zionist regime on June 23, 2025, after its military aggression against Iran, reports from Arab sources indicate the arrival of 17 heavy transport aircraft carrying military equipment from the United States and Germany to the Occupied Territories. This move, which the Iraqi media “Naya” describes as part of Western efforts to rebuild the Zionist regime’s military capabilities after heavy losses in the 12-day war with Iran, poses a serious threat to regional peace and Iran’s nuclear negotiations.

Netanyahu’s Tactics to Evade Trial Under Pretext of Security and Regional Developments

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An Israeli regime affairs researcher stated: The Zionist regime media recently announced that Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of this regime, has requested a two-week postponement of his trial for security reasons and regional developments. On Sunday, news also emerged that the “Occupied Jerusalem” district court agreed to postpone Netanyahu’s trial by one week. This decision followed the Zionist regime Prime Minister summoning officials from the Foreign Intelligence Service (Mossad) and Military Intelligence Organization (Aman) to a confidential session held at this court to explain the reasons for his request to delay his trial by two weeks.

Loading
Samir Design Group گروه طراحی سمیر