International implications of the reduction in the US shale oil production

2020/12/13 | Economy, Note, top news

Strategic Council Online—Editorial: Bloomberg recently published a report on the end of remarkable growth in the production of shale oil by the United States; of course, the reduction of shale oil production is not a new phenomenon. It actually began several months ago. However, the recent report indicates a rapid reduction at a level some analysts cannot envisage a growth in the shale oil production even for the year 2023. Reza Majidzadeh-Economics researcher

Even though in February 2020, the United States registered a record of production of more than 13 million barrels of oil per day, the outbreak of the Covid-19 and its implications for a reduction in demand for oil resulted in a reduction in the oil production while it was expected that the production of the US shell oil, according to estimates, would grow by more than 40 percent by 2025 and reach to 17 million barrels per day. The reasons behind such a reduction in the production of oil aside, it is important to analyze its international implications especially for the OPEC Plus and the future of the world’s oil markets.

 

After the United States President Donald Trump withdrew from the nuclear deal, the US government made gradual efforts to replace the Iranian and Venezuelan oil with its own in the global markets. High tensions in the oil-rich regions of the world prevented a sharp reduction in oil prices and the Shell oil production remained cost-effective. For this reason, the United States managed to gradually capture the Iranian share of oil swap markets as well as the Iranian oil sale to China. Trump even threatened to impose customs tariffs on Saudi goods to put pressure on Riyadh to reach an agreement with Russia to reduce the production of oil so that oil prices do not continue to fall. High oil prices had two benefits for the US: more pressure on China and India, and more financial profits from US shale to produce more cost-effective oil.

 

However, the Covid-19 outbreak crisis changed the situation on the ground, forcing the shale oil to be under-produced. This ultimately resulted in less profits to a level the shale even raised the issue of selling its foreign assets to compensate the loss. China is a potential buyer of the assets and subsidiaries owned by the Shell inside the United States. This may happen if the shale oil continues to be under-produced. On one hand, China’s economic recovery after the outbreak of coronavirus began sooner than other countries. On the other hand, China is in dire and strategic need for oil in order to advance its economy and maintain the present economic growth rate in line with strengthening its dominance over the global markets.

 

Under the circumstances in which the Trump administration is transiting power to the team of the President-elect of the United States which is expected to adopt an approach different than the Trump team in the global trade war and international relations, China is gaining a proper opportunity. The less the global price of oil, the less the value of oil fields in the daily production of oil. And if the price of oil does not increase in winter, China’s chances would turn into a golden opportunity.

 

This oil chess would be more complicated considering the probable change in the foreign relations of the United States after Trump. It appears that Biden’s approach to energy would be closer to Obama’s and would be inclined to new energies. The return of the United States to the Paris Climate Change Agreement could signal Biden’s determination to move towards the use of clear and green energies; however, the direct impact of the reduction in the US oil production would be on the OPEC Plus countries especially Iran. If Biden chooses to return to the nuclear deal, then the landscape of the supply in the global oil markets would change according to the expectation that Iran and even Venezuela oil would make their way once again to global markets. If this happens, oil prices are expected to decline and the US shell would find no financial benefit in producing oil. Mohammad bin Salman’s refusal to get closer to Israel demonstrated that Saudi Arabia expects a remarkable change in the US foreign relations in the post-Trump era and is waiting for the ultimate transition of power to the Biden’s administration to adjust its approaches and policies. Such probable changes in approaches and policies would mean more chances for Iran to regain its OPEC share in oil production after the probable lifting of Trump sanctions by Biden. Notwithstanding, there is another factor which should be taken into consideration in this chess play: Russia. There is new opportunity for Russia which can hamper or slow the trend of Iran’s return to the global oil market. Additionally, the speed and quality of the distribution of the coronavirus vaccine and global access to vaccination expected by the World Health Organization are other determining factors as the probable time of the rehabilitation of countries and their return to normalcy would lead to an increase in the demand for crude oil, resulting in an increase in oil prices and enough financial incentives for the re-production of the shale oil. Therefore, under such complex situation, the time periods concerning the change in the foreign policy trends of the United States and the return to normalcy after the global vaccination against Covid-19 will be determining in the probable international implications of the reduction in the production of oil by the US shale.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Messages and Strategic Implications of the Operation True Promise-2

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Operation True Promise-2, whose targets included the safest places of the Zionist regime, caused a lot of damage, while the number of ballistic missiles fired, which is the largest number in one day in history, is unprecedented in the lifetime of the Zionist regime.

Russia’s Nuclear Doctrine on the Ukraine War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that Russia’s threat to use nuclear weapons in the Ukraine war comes with a “deterrence” approach because the Russians currently have no ground for using nuclear weapons.

Zionist Regime’s Use of Artificial Intelligence in Gaza War and Its Consequences

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although artificial intelligence has important capabilities to improve and increase the level of efficiency and productivity in various human fields, including medicine, rapid diagnosis of diseases, progress in the field of treatment, industries, transportation, and education, it is an effective auxiliary tool to reduce damages. Natural disasters, etc., can bring outstanding achievements to human society. Still, this technology, which is a great blessing, has been used by the Zionist regime, especially in the Gaza war, to “advance non-conventional goals.”

Netanyahu’s Goals of Escalating Tensions with Lebanon’s Hezbollah

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An international affairs expert said: The situation of Netanyahu and the Likud Party has improved somewhat compared to the early months of the October 7 war, and it can be assumed that Netanyahu’s actions in Gaza, Lebanon, and the West Bank will not end soon, so much so that he will not allow a ceasefire to take place.

“New Order” According to the Zionist Regime?!

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime has announced that the codename of the assassination operation of Martyr Seyed Hassan Nasrallah was “New Order.” What might this designation mean, and why should the international community be concerned about it?

Implications of UN Passing Resolution against the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: Recently, the United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution supported by the majority of its members, calling for the end of the occupation of Palestinian territories within the next twelve months. This resolution was approved with 124 votes in favor, 14 against, and 43 other countries abstaining. In this resolution, the Israeli regime is asked to pay compensation for the damage and suffering inflicted on the Palestinian people during the occupation.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Messages and Strategic Implications of the Operation True Promise-2

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Operation True Promise-2, whose targets included the safest places of the Zionist regime, caused a lot of damage, while the number of ballistic missiles fired, which is the largest number in one day in history, is unprecedented in the lifetime of the Zionist regime.

Russia’s Nuclear Doctrine on the Ukraine War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on international issues said that Russia’s threat to use nuclear weapons in the Ukraine war comes with a “deterrence” approach because the Russians currently have no ground for using nuclear weapons.

Zionist Regime’s Use of Artificial Intelligence in Gaza War and Its Consequences

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although artificial intelligence has important capabilities to improve and increase the level of efficiency and productivity in various human fields, including medicine, rapid diagnosis of diseases, progress in the field of treatment, industries, transportation, and education, it is an effective auxiliary tool to reduce damages. Natural disasters, etc., can bring outstanding achievements to human society. Still, this technology, which is a great blessing, has been used by the Zionist regime, especially in the Gaza war, to “advance non-conventional goals.”

Netanyahu’s Goals of Escalating Tensions with Lebanon’s Hezbollah

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An international affairs expert said: The situation of Netanyahu and the Likud Party has improved somewhat compared to the early months of the October 7 war, and it can be assumed that Netanyahu’s actions in Gaza, Lebanon, and the West Bank will not end soon, so much so that he will not allow a ceasefire to take place.

“New Order” According to the Zionist Regime?!

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Zionist regime has announced that the codename of the assassination operation of Martyr Seyed Hassan Nasrallah was “New Order.” What might this designation mean, and why should the international community be concerned about it?

Implications of UN Passing Resolution against the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on West Asian issues said: Recently, the United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution supported by the majority of its members, calling for the end of the occupation of Palestinian territories within the next twelve months. This resolution was approved with 124 votes in favor, 14 against, and 43 other countries abstaining. In this resolution, the Israeli regime is asked to pay compensation for the damage and suffering inflicted on the Palestinian people during the occupation.

Loading