EU-UK Talks Deadlocked

2020/09/16 | Economy, Note, top news

Strategic Council Online - If Britain withdraws from the European Union without an agreement, it will no longer be able to use the EU market and the two sides will have to negotiate customs tariffs. In such a situation, trade barriers will be built in the ports of both sides, which will make the entry and exit of goods difficult and will affect the price trend. Morteza Makki - European Affairs Expert

After British Prime Minister Boris Johnson on Monday threatened Brussels with a hard exit from the European Union, Michel Barnier, the EU’s chief negotiator pointing to the London strategy, called the situation “worrying” and urged the UK to live up to its commitments. “Everything that has been signed must be respected,” he said. British Prime Minister Boris Johnson has warned the European Union that London will pursue a “no-deal” version of trade relations with the bloc if no progress is made on a deal by October 15. According to a text released by Johnson’s office, he has given 38 days to EU to reach a free trade agreement with London.

Earlier, Michel Barnier, the EU’s chief negotiator on Brexit, said negotiations between the two sides on future trade were very difficult. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen also warned the British government on Monday that it must abide by its international commitment to the Brexit agreement and make it the basis for any future economic and political relations with the European Union.

With just one month left until the end of the British government’s negotiations with the European Union to reach an agreement on Britain’s exit from the bloc, the two sides have not yet reached a comprehensive agreement. During this period, about seven rounds of negotiations took place between the EU and the UK, but at the end of each round of negotiations, EU representatives, especially Michel Barnier, the EU’s High Representative, expressed concern about the negotiation process and called for London to become more serious.

 

A comprehensive agreement to leave the EU has been reached. In return, the British government accuses Brussels of stubbornness and inflexibility in reaching a comprehensive agreement.

Recent approaches by Michel Barnier and Boris Johnson, meanwhile, show that the two sides have no intention of backing down. At the same time, the two sides predicted that the negotiations would not be concluded in this short period of time, and the European Union called for an extension of the negotiations; But London has taken a hard line on this, believing that negotiations should be concluded in the set time, but we have seen that this did not happen in practice, and even recently Britain has announced that it is ready to leave the EU without an agreement. However, Britain’s withdrawal from the EU without the consent of the EU could pose serious challenges for both the EU and the UK.

Half of Britain’s trade is with the European Union, and some European countries, such as Denmark, account for up to a quarter of their trade with London. Therefore, if London and Brussels do not reach an agreement in this regard, both London and some members of the European Union will suffer great losses. Meanwhile, the most important issue between Britain and the European Union is the free and competitive market between the two sides.

The UK is looking to use the EU’s customs and free market, while the EU believes that if London wants to use the EU market, it must meet Brussels’ standards. But this is contrary to Britain’s intentions to leave the European Union. The UK left the EU with the aim of not being under the umbrella of EU rules and regulations and to be able to make independent decisions in various areas, especially the issue of immigrants; but if London now wants to comply with Brussels’ demands, it will not be able to achieve its goals.

The remaining days until the end of this round of British negotiations with the European Union are difficult days for both London and Brussels. If the two sides do not reach an agreement, while the corona outbreak has caused a recession in Britain and the European Union, the two sides will suffer great losses. Of course, Britain is more vulnerable in this regard, because the COVID 19 has made the British economy shrink and face recession, and there is currently no prospect of confronting the coronavirus. It seems that Boris Johnson will try to force the EU to compromise with his stubborn stance during this remaining period, and may agree to a resumption of negotiations in the 90th minute, But Brussels has also read Johnson’s hand and does not want to make Britain a role model for other EU member states that seek to exploit the European market without making a commitment.

Eventually, if Britain does leave the bloc without an agreement, it will no longer be able to use the EU market, and the two sides will have to negotiate tariffs. In such a situation, trade barriers will be built in the ports of both sides, which will make the entry and exit of goods difficult and will affect the price trend.

 

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Implications of the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Myanmar’s Leader

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Myanmar’s military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, is facing charges of committing crimes against humanity for the killing and persecution of Rohingya Muslims. The crimes, which affected more than a million people in Myanmar, took place between August and December 2017. During this period, the Myanmar military launched an operation called “clearance” under the pretext of fighting armed groups that led to the genocide of Muslims in Rakhine State in western Myanmar. This operation was accompanied by the widespread killing of more than 200,000 Rohingya Muslims and the displacement of about 700,000 people. The International Criminal Court has identified these actions as examples of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Implications of the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Myanmar’s Leader

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Myanmar’s military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, is facing charges of committing crimes against humanity for the killing and persecution of Rohingya Muslims. The crimes, which affected more than a million people in Myanmar, took place between August and December 2017. During this period, the Myanmar military launched an operation called “clearance” under the pretext of fighting armed groups that led to the genocide of Muslims in Rakhine State in western Myanmar. This operation was accompanied by the widespread killing of more than 200,000 Rohingya Muslims and the displacement of about 700,000 people. The International Criminal Court has identified these actions as examples of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

Loading