Regional Implications of Strengthening Indo-US Military Cooperation

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The sale of advanced F-35 fighter jets by the United States to India is a major strategic event in the geopolitical and military arena in the South Asian region. This decision not only indicates the strengthening of military and economic relations between Washington and New Delhi but could profoundly impact the balance of power in the Indian subcontinent, especially concerning India’s main rivals, namely Pakistan and China.

Amin Rezainejad – Expert on Subcontinental Issues

The first issue is the increase in India’s military superiority over Pakistan. The F-35 fighter jets, which use the latest stealth technologies and artificial intelligence capabilities, can seriously threaten any type of Pakistani air defense. A capability that was previously highly challenging. For example, in the 2019 border conflict between India and Pakistan, an Indian fighter jet was shot down by Pakistani air defenses in the Line of Control area, and the Indian pilot was captured. India has a significant military advantage over Pakistan, which will increase significantly with acquiring these aircraft. The Pakistan Air Force currently operates mainly older Chinese fighters – such as the JF-17 Thunder – and Russian fighters – such as the MiG-29 and Su-30 – which are technologically and operationally inferior to the F-35. This could lead to a shift in the air balance between the two countries. In addition, India’s access to the F-35 could have a significant psychological impact on Pakistan, reinforcing its sense of weakness and threat. This could lead to increased bilateral tensions and even the possibility of military crises between the two countries. This could also make Iranian air defense systems more attractive to Pakistan, given their successful performance against American and Israeli aircraft in recent years.

On the one hand, Pakistan is likely to seek to strengthen its military relations with China and demand more advanced military equipment from this country. This could lead to an intensification of the Sino-Indian competition in the region. In addition, Pakistan may seek to use asymmetric warfare and seek to strengthen militia groups or develop smaller (tactical) nuclear weapons to change the balance of power in its favor.

Strategic competition with China is another issue that could complicate the dimensions of this event. China is currently developing its own advanced fighter jets, such as the Chengdu J-20 and Shenyang J-31. However, the F-35 fighter jets are still at a higher level in technology and performance. India’s access to these fighters could pose a direct threat to China’s air force. India and China are in a strategic rivalry in the Indian Ocean region, and by equipping themselves with the F-35, India could increase its capabilities in air surveillance and control of the Indo-Pacific region, thereby putting more pressure on China.

In contrast, China will likely use this opportunity to strengthen its military relations with Pakistan. This could lead to an intensification of the “India-China-Pakistan” triangle of competition. A competition that, given its scale, could also open the door to Iran and Russia. In addition, China may invest more in developing stealth fighters and other advanced military technologies to counter the F-35 threat.

The sale of the F-35 to India indicates a strengthening of the India-US strategic axis against Chinese influence in the region. This could lead to a new “balance of power” in the Indian subcontinent. As a member of the Quad (the United States, Japan, Australia, and India), India plays an important role in limiting China’s influence in the Pacific and Indian Oceans. Equipping the Indian Air Force with the F-35 could strengthen this role and even extend the scope of the competition between India and China to the Southeast Asian region. On the other hand, the sale of the F-35 to India can be identified as a “triggered factor.” A factor that causes other countries in the region, including Pakistan and China, to accelerate their weapons programs. This could lead to an increase in the share of military budgets in the GDP of these countries and effectively sacrifice economic development in all three countries for the sake of arms war. However, given the size of India and China’s economies, Pakistan suffers more from this competition than these countries. Rising military tensions could also increase the risk of nuclear weapons being used in the region, especially given that all three countries—India, Pakistan, and China—possess nuclear weapons.

0 Comments

LATEST CONTENT

Factors Influencing Trump’s Tariff Agreement with China

Strategic Council Online – Interview: The Secretary-General of the Iran-China Strategic Studies Think Tank stated that the temporary reduction of tariffs between the U.S. and China will not significantly alleviate the distrust among traders and investors, as U.S.-China trade relations during the Trump era remain highly challenging.

The Outlook of Recent U.S. Agreements with Yemen’s Ansarullah and Hamas

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A while ago, the Hamas movement announced direct negotiations with the U.S. government and an agreement to release Idan Alexander, a dual American-Israeli military prisoner. Later, a senior Hamas official confirmed the direct talks with the U.S. But what is the story behind this?

An Analysis of the Prospects for a Peace Agreement Between Ukraine and Russia

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Given the suspension of weeks-long negotiations between Russia and the United States regarding ending the war in Ukraine, Donald Trump has effectively failed to end the war in Ukraine within his expected timeframe. This is especially true since Trump’s demands for ending the war caused significant shock among European leaders and the Ukrainian government, effectively disregarding their political and economic interests in these negotiations.

Analysis of the Recent Disagreements between Trump and Netanyahu

Strategic Council Online– Note: In recent weeks, the warmth of relations between Trump and Netanyahu has been questioned, and it seems that the two sides have had significant disagreements regarding the mechanisms for dealing with sensitive issues and challenges in the region, especially Iran, Hamas, Gaza, and Yemen.

Consequences of Inviting Al-Sharaa to the Arab Summit in Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The invitation to Ahmed Al-Sharaa, head of Syria’s interim government, to attend the Arab Summit in Baghdad sends a message from the Iraqi government to the Arab world that Baghdad seeks to play a central role in rebuilding Arab relations and reducing regional tensions. However, the path ahead for Baghdad does not appear straightforward. The invitation to Syria’s interim President, facilitated by the mediation of Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, the Emir of Qatar, and Iraqi Prime Minister Sudani’s initial meeting with Al-Sharaa in Doha in February 2025, demonstrates Iraq’s determination to mediate regional conflicts.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Factors Influencing Trump’s Tariff Agreement with China

Strategic Council Online – Interview: The Secretary-General of the Iran-China Strategic Studies Think Tank stated that the temporary reduction of tariffs between the U.S. and China will not significantly alleviate the distrust among traders and investors, as U.S.-China trade relations during the Trump era remain highly challenging.

The Outlook of Recent U.S. Agreements with Yemen’s Ansarullah and Hamas

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A while ago, the Hamas movement announced direct negotiations with the U.S. government and an agreement to release Idan Alexander, a dual American-Israeli military prisoner. Later, a senior Hamas official confirmed the direct talks with the U.S. But what is the story behind this?

An Analysis of the Prospects for a Peace Agreement Between Ukraine and Russia

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Given the suspension of weeks-long negotiations between Russia and the United States regarding ending the war in Ukraine, Donald Trump has effectively failed to end the war in Ukraine within his expected timeframe. This is especially true since Trump’s demands for ending the war caused significant shock among European leaders and the Ukrainian government, effectively disregarding their political and economic interests in these negotiations.

Analysis of the Recent Disagreements between Trump and Netanyahu

Strategic Council Online– Note: In recent weeks, the warmth of relations between Trump and Netanyahu has been questioned, and it seems that the two sides have had significant disagreements regarding the mechanisms for dealing with sensitive issues and challenges in the region, especially Iran, Hamas, Gaza, and Yemen.

Consequences of Inviting Al-Sharaa to the Arab Summit in Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The invitation to Ahmed Al-Sharaa, head of Syria’s interim government, to attend the Arab Summit in Baghdad sends a message from the Iraqi government to the Arab world that Baghdad seeks to play a central role in rebuilding Arab relations and reducing regional tensions. However, the path ahead for Baghdad does not appear straightforward. The invitation to Syria’s interim President, facilitated by the mediation of Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, the Emir of Qatar, and Iraqi Prime Minister Sudani’s initial meeting with Al-Sharaa in Doha in February 2025, demonstrates Iraq’s determination to mediate regional conflicts.

Loading
Samir Design Group گروه طراحی سمیر