Regional Implications of Strengthening Indo-US Military Cooperation

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The sale of advanced F-35 fighter jets by the United States to India is a major strategic event in the geopolitical and military arena in the South Asian region. This decision not only indicates the strengthening of military and economic relations between Washington and New Delhi but could profoundly impact the balance of power in the Indian subcontinent, especially concerning India’s main rivals, namely Pakistan and China.

Amin Rezainejad – Expert on Subcontinental Issues

The first issue is the increase in India’s military superiority over Pakistan. The F-35 fighter jets, which use the latest stealth technologies and artificial intelligence capabilities, can seriously threaten any type of Pakistani air defense. A capability that was previously highly challenging. For example, in the 2019 border conflict between India and Pakistan, an Indian fighter jet was shot down by Pakistani air defenses in the Line of Control area, and the Indian pilot was captured. India has a significant military advantage over Pakistan, which will increase significantly with acquiring these aircraft. The Pakistan Air Force currently operates mainly older Chinese fighters – such as the JF-17 Thunder – and Russian fighters – such as the MiG-29 and Su-30 – which are technologically and operationally inferior to the F-35. This could lead to a shift in the air balance between the two countries. In addition, India’s access to the F-35 could have a significant psychological impact on Pakistan, reinforcing its sense of weakness and threat. This could lead to increased bilateral tensions and even the possibility of military crises between the two countries. This could also make Iranian air defense systems more attractive to Pakistan, given their successful performance against American and Israeli aircraft in recent years.

On the one hand, Pakistan is likely to seek to strengthen its military relations with China and demand more advanced military equipment from this country. This could lead to an intensification of the Sino-Indian competition in the region. In addition, Pakistan may seek to use asymmetric warfare and seek to strengthen militia groups or develop smaller (tactical) nuclear weapons to change the balance of power in its favor.

Strategic competition with China is another issue that could complicate the dimensions of this event. China is currently developing its own advanced fighter jets, such as the Chengdu J-20 and Shenyang J-31. However, the F-35 fighter jets are still at a higher level in technology and performance. India’s access to these fighters could pose a direct threat to China’s air force. India and China are in a strategic rivalry in the Indian Ocean region, and by equipping themselves with the F-35, India could increase its capabilities in air surveillance and control of the Indo-Pacific region, thereby putting more pressure on China.

In contrast, China will likely use this opportunity to strengthen its military relations with Pakistan. This could lead to an intensification of the “India-China-Pakistan” triangle of competition. A competition that, given its scale, could also open the door to Iran and Russia. In addition, China may invest more in developing stealth fighters and other advanced military technologies to counter the F-35 threat.

The sale of the F-35 to India indicates a strengthening of the India-US strategic axis against Chinese influence in the region. This could lead to a new “balance of power” in the Indian subcontinent. As a member of the Quad (the United States, Japan, Australia, and India), India plays an important role in limiting China’s influence in the Pacific and Indian Oceans. Equipping the Indian Air Force with the F-35 could strengthen this role and even extend the scope of the competition between India and China to the Southeast Asian region. On the other hand, the sale of the F-35 to India can be identified as a “triggered factor.” A factor that causes other countries in the region, including Pakistan and China, to accelerate their weapons programs. This could lead to an increase in the share of military budgets in the GDP of these countries and effectively sacrifice economic development in all three countries for the sake of arms war. However, given the size of India and China’s economies, Pakistan suffers more from this competition than these countries. Rising military tensions could also increase the risk of nuclear weapons being used in the region, especially given that all three countries—India, Pakistan, and China—possess nuclear weapons.

0 Comments

LATEST CONTENT

A New Chapter Awaits Tehran-Riyadh Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The visit of Saudi Defense Minister Khalid bin Salman to Iran, the presentation of the message of the Saudi King to the Supreme Leader of the Revolution, and the meeting with high-ranking officials of the Islamic Republic of Iran, in addition to playing an effective role in strengthening and consolidating bilateral relations, can be effective in providing the necessary platforms and conditions for advancing collective cooperation in the region.

New Regional Order and the Requirement of Pathology of Iran’s Strategy

Strategic Council Online – Guest Note: After the developments in Syria and the challenges that the Axis of Resistance has faced, policymakers and analysts have decided to present a new representation of the Middle East regional order and consider new dimensions in their decision-making. The change and new combination of cooperation and alliances indicate an understanding of changes in the regional order. As a result, we are witnessing a change in strategies, which also requires changing their type of action and approach.

Tariff War and Escalation of Tension in China-US Relations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: The Secretary-General of the Iran-China Strategic Studies Institute believes that following the tariff war between China and the US, relations between Washington and Beijing face a turbulent outlook during the Trump era.

Consequences of the Trump Administration’s Trade War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The consequences of Trump’s trade war, which is unprecedented and new and has apparently been implemented to ” support domestic production” in the United States and “balance global trade,” are gradually becoming apparent.

Analysis: Egypt’s Approach to the Gaza Crisis

Strategic Council Online Opinion: Egypt’s foreign policy towards West Asia, especially in matters related to Gaza, is influenced by complex strategic factors that include national security, relations with global powers, and the country’s role in regional developments.

Analysis of the China-US Tariff War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: China expects the “Made in China 2025” strategy to be completed and realized this year. On the other hand, the United States sees its supposed hegemony in danger and is trying to maintain its position.
In this situation and as one of the means of confrontation, the trade war has intensified again, as was the experience of the 2016-2020 period, and in the most recent action, China and the United States have increased tariffs on each other’s agricultural products; China by 15 percent and the United States by 20 percent. Will this ping-pong lead to a trade agreement, or will the trade war intensify?

Prospects for US Attacks on Ansar Allah

strategic Council Online – Opinion: After more than three weeks of military aggression and unprecedented and widespread bombing of various cities in Yemen, the US government has not yet gained significant and strategic achievements in line with its declared goals.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

A New Chapter Awaits Tehran-Riyadh Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The visit of Saudi Defense Minister Khalid bin Salman to Iran, the presentation of the message of the Saudi King to the Supreme Leader of the Revolution, and the meeting with high-ranking officials of the Islamic Republic of Iran, in addition to playing an effective role in strengthening and consolidating bilateral relations, can be effective in providing the necessary platforms and conditions for advancing collective cooperation in the region.

New Regional Order and the Requirement of Pathology of Iran’s Strategy

Strategic Council Online – Guest Note: After the developments in Syria and the challenges that the Axis of Resistance has faced, policymakers and analysts have decided to present a new representation of the Middle East regional order and consider new dimensions in their decision-making. The change and new combination of cooperation and alliances indicate an understanding of changes in the regional order. As a result, we are witnessing a change in strategies, which also requires changing their type of action and approach.

Tariff War and Escalation of Tension in China-US Relations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: The Secretary-General of the Iran-China Strategic Studies Institute believes that following the tariff war between China and the US, relations between Washington and Beijing face a turbulent outlook during the Trump era.

Consequences of the Trump Administration’s Trade War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The consequences of Trump’s trade war, which is unprecedented and new and has apparently been implemented to ” support domestic production” in the United States and “balance global trade,” are gradually becoming apparent.

Analysis: Egypt’s Approach to the Gaza Crisis

Strategic Council Online Opinion: Egypt’s foreign policy towards West Asia, especially in matters related to Gaza, is influenced by complex strategic factors that include national security, relations with global powers, and the country’s role in regional developments.

Analysis of the China-US Tariff War

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: China expects the “Made in China 2025” strategy to be completed and realized this year. On the other hand, the United States sees its supposed hegemony in danger and is trying to maintain its position.
In this situation and as one of the means of confrontation, the trade war has intensified again, as was the experience of the 2016-2020 period, and in the most recent action, China and the United States have increased tariffs on each other’s agricultural products; China by 15 percent and the United States by 20 percent. Will this ping-pong lead to a trade agreement, or will the trade war intensify?

Prospects for US Attacks on Ansar Allah

strategic Council Online – Opinion: After more than three weeks of military aggression and unprecedented and widespread bombing of various cities in Yemen, the US government has not yet gained significant and strategic achievements in line with its declared goals.

Loading
Samir Design Group گروه طراحی سمیر