Change in Europe’s Political Approach to the Ukraine War

Strategic Council Online - Opinion: Ukraine's attack on the Kursk region and seizing part of Russian territory is a turning point in the two-and-a-half-year war between Russia and Ukraine. In a full-scale psychological war, the United States and some European governments claimed that Iran was sending ballistic missiles to Russia. The claim aimed at putting pressure on Tehran and, in the meantime, justify arming Ukraine with long-range missiles from the United States and Europe. This is even though the Islamic Republic of Iran has clearly stated that it has not provided Russia with any missiles.

Morteza Makki – expert on European issues

Volodymyr Zelenskiy, the president of Ukraine, thought that he could use this surprise operation as a trump card in peace negotiations and force the Russians to trade land for land. However, this operation in the Kursk region of Russia did not meet the expectations of the president of Ukraine to the extent that Zelensky made changes in the cabinet. Russia’s reaction and intensification of air and ground attacks followed. In the field, Russia made advances on the eastern front.

At the same time, the European governments in support of Ukraine considered the entry of this country’s army into Russian territory as Ukraine’s right to defend itself. Considering that his expectations were not met during the operation in the Kursk region, the president of Ukraine made extensive political moves to convince the United States and European governments to supply Kiev with long-range missiles to attack deep in Russian territory. Of course, the positions of the United States and European governments in this regard are not very clear.

In the current situation, for the United States and the European Troika, pressuring Iran and pursuing Iranophobia is a major goal, and they use every opportunity to implement this policy. But in the political arena of the war in Ukraine, the European governments are well aware of the consequences and threats that arming Ukraine with long-range ballistic missiles to target the depths of Russian soil will bring to Europe’s security. Putin has announced that this action of the Western governments is the direct and official entry of NATO into the war with Russia. Meanwhile, the European governments do not want to enter into a direct confrontation with this country in a proxy war with Russia in Ukraine.

Another important variable in the Ukraine war that has prompted European governments to oppose the supply of long-range missiles to Kiev is the American election. Donald Trump, the Republican candidate, has announced that if he wins the election, his first priority will be to end the war in Ukraine. These conditions have put the field and political arena of war in Ukraine in a complicated and difficult situation.

In such a complex situation, the European governments, especially Germany and France, as the driving engine and the largest arms exporters in Europe, send signals to Ukraine to talk with Putin and start peace talks with the participation of Russia, along with all-round support for Ukraine. In this regard, German Chancellor Olaf Schultz has announced that any peace conference in the future for the war in Ukraine must be with the participation of Russia; Emmanuel Macron, the president of France, has also changed his position and called for a review of relations with Russia. In a statement, the President of France emphasized the need for a new world order and stressed that Europe should reconsider its current relations with Russia to establish peace and stability in this continent.

At the end of March last year, Macron called to send troops to Ukraine, but he said he was ready to talk with Putin on any topic of interest. These positions show that the political atmosphere in Europe is in the direction of fundamental changes regarding the war in Ukraine.

0 Comments

LATEST CONTENT

The Prospect of a Possible Trade Agreement between the United States and China

Strategic Council Online– Interview: An international relations expert stated that the growing possibility of a trade agreement between the United States and China following the recent meeting between Donald Trump and Xi Jinping in South Korea is not a strategic economic reconciliation, but rather a tactical move by Beijing in the process of restructuring power within the emerging world order.

Chabahar’s Strategic Position Amid Rising India-U.S. Tensions

Strategic Council Online- Interview: An analyst of subcontinent affairs stated: Chabahar has become the focal point of the intersection of India and America’s competition and cooperation; a place where diplomacy, economy, and geopolitics intertwine.

The Position of Water Diplomacy in Safeguarding Iran’s Water Rights

Strategic Council Online- Interview: An international affairs expert said, “By utilizing multilateral capacities and regional diplomacy, Iran is trying to establish geopolitical balance against the water policies of its neighbors while safeguarding its historical water rights.”

Egypt’s Motives and Goals for Mediation in the Region

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An Egyptian affairs expert stated that Cairo has recently established a direct role in mediating the reduction of regional tensions, as well as in reducing or managing tensions between Iran and the West and with the International Atomic Energy Agency.

The West’s Confusion in the Ukraine War

Strategic Council Online– Opinion: The experience of three and a half years of Russia’s war with Ukraine and the tensions it has had with the West within this framework have shown that the Russians have not only given in at any stage in the face of Western pressure, including sanctions, but this has also led to an escalation of tensions, differences, and conflicts, both in the region and in Russia-West relations. In practice, any effort in this regard has so far had at least negative results for the Ukrainians, and they have faced increased Russian attacks.

The Stalemate of the Ukraine War on the Battlefield and in Diplomacy

Strategic Council Online– Opinion: Russia’s recent nuclear exercises, under the direct supervision of Vladimir Putin, were not merely a military drill. Instead, they constituted a calculated show of force amidst a weakening diplomatic process and the suspension of a potential Trump-Putin meeting.

Consequences of the Hague Court’s Advisory Opinion on the Crimes of the Israeli Regime for the Global Legal and Political Order

Strategic Council Online- Interview: An international affairs analyst stated that the recent opinion of the International Court of Justice against the crimes of the Zionist regime is a turning point in the evolution of the global legal order; an opinion that, while weakening the political position of the Israeli regime, has once again revived the legal legitimacy of the Palestinian issue at the international level.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Prospect of a Possible Trade Agreement between the United States and China

Strategic Council Online– Interview: An international relations expert stated that the growing possibility of a trade agreement between the United States and China following the recent meeting between Donald Trump and Xi Jinping in South Korea is not a strategic economic reconciliation, but rather a tactical move by Beijing in the process of restructuring power within the emerging world order.

Chabahar’s Strategic Position Amid Rising India-U.S. Tensions

Strategic Council Online- Interview: An analyst of subcontinent affairs stated: Chabahar has become the focal point of the intersection of India and America’s competition and cooperation; a place where diplomacy, economy, and geopolitics intertwine.

The Position of Water Diplomacy in Safeguarding Iran’s Water Rights

Strategic Council Online- Interview: An international affairs expert said, “By utilizing multilateral capacities and regional diplomacy, Iran is trying to establish geopolitical balance against the water policies of its neighbors while safeguarding its historical water rights.”

Egypt’s Motives and Goals for Mediation in the Region

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An Egyptian affairs expert stated that Cairo has recently established a direct role in mediating the reduction of regional tensions, as well as in reducing or managing tensions between Iran and the West and with the International Atomic Energy Agency.

The West’s Confusion in the Ukraine War

Strategic Council Online– Opinion: The experience of three and a half years of Russia’s war with Ukraine and the tensions it has had with the West within this framework have shown that the Russians have not only given in at any stage in the face of Western pressure, including sanctions, but this has also led to an escalation of tensions, differences, and conflicts, both in the region and in Russia-West relations. In practice, any effort in this regard has so far had at least negative results for the Ukrainians, and they have faced increased Russian attacks.

The Stalemate of the Ukraine War on the Battlefield and in Diplomacy

Strategic Council Online– Opinion: Russia’s recent nuclear exercises, under the direct supervision of Vladimir Putin, were not merely a military drill. Instead, they constituted a calculated show of force amidst a weakening diplomatic process and the suspension of a potential Trump-Putin meeting.

Consequences of the Hague Court’s Advisory Opinion on the Crimes of the Israeli Regime for the Global Legal and Political Order

Strategic Council Online- Interview: An international affairs analyst stated that the recent opinion of the International Court of Justice against the crimes of the Zionist regime is a turning point in the evolution of the global legal order; an opinion that, while weakening the political position of the Israeli regime, has once again revived the legal legitimacy of the Palestinian issue at the international level.

Loading

DERNIER CONTENU

The Prospect of a Possible Trade Agreement between the United States and China

Strategic Council Online– Interview: An international relations expert stated that the growing possibility of a trade agreement between the United States and China following the recent meeting between Donald Trump and Xi Jinping in South Korea is not a strategic economic reconciliation, but rather a tactical move by Beijing in the process of restructuring power within the emerging world order.

Chabahar’s Strategic Position Amid Rising India-U.S. Tensions

Strategic Council Online- Interview: An analyst of subcontinent affairs stated: Chabahar has become the focal point of the intersection of India and America’s competition and cooperation; a place where diplomacy, economy, and geopolitics intertwine.

The Position of Water Diplomacy in Safeguarding Iran’s Water Rights

Strategic Council Online- Interview: An international affairs expert said, “By utilizing multilateral capacities and regional diplomacy, Iran is trying to establish geopolitical balance against the water policies of its neighbors while safeguarding its historical water rights.”

Egypt’s Motives and Goals for Mediation in the Region

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An Egyptian affairs expert stated that Cairo has recently established a direct role in mediating the reduction of regional tensions, as well as in reducing or managing tensions between Iran and the West and with the International Atomic Energy Agency.

The West’s Confusion in the Ukraine War

Strategic Council Online– Opinion: The experience of three and a half years of Russia’s war with Ukraine and the tensions it has had with the West within this framework have shown that the Russians have not only given in at any stage in the face of Western pressure, including sanctions, but this has also led to an escalation of tensions, differences, and conflicts, both in the region and in Russia-West relations. In practice, any effort in this regard has so far had at least negative results for the Ukrainians, and they have faced increased Russian attacks.

The Stalemate of the Ukraine War on the Battlefield and in Diplomacy

Strategic Council Online– Opinion: Russia’s recent nuclear exercises, under the direct supervision of Vladimir Putin, were not merely a military drill. Instead, they constituted a calculated show of force amidst a weakening diplomatic process and the suspension of a potential Trump-Putin meeting.

Consequences of the Hague Court’s Advisory Opinion on the Crimes of the Israeli Regime for the Global Legal and Political Order

Strategic Council Online- Interview: An international affairs analyst stated that the recent opinion of the International Court of Justice against the crimes of the Zionist regime is a turning point in the evolution of the global legal order; an opinion that, while weakening the political position of the Israeli regime, has once again revived the legal legitimacy of the Palestinian issue at the international level.

Loading