Factors and Consequences of the Spread of Security Threats in the West Bank

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Amid the Zionist regime's crimes in the Gaza Strip, the West Bank is also experiencing "unstable conditions" so that in recent months and parallel to the intensification of the Zionist attacks against Gaza, the tensions in this sensitive area have witnessed an exponential trend and " "security threats" against the Zionist regime have been escalated so much that it has greatly worried security and intelligence circles.

Barsam Mohammadi – regional issues expert

Developments in the field and the war fronts in Gaza, the adoption of the position of “negative neutrality” by the self-governing organizations against the genocide of the people in Gaza and Rafah, the intensification of the operations of the occupier army in the West Bank, the encouragement and assistance of the Islamic Resistance Front, especially Hamas and Islamic Jihad, to the residents of the West Bank to fight against the Zionist regime and ultimately the arming of the Zionist settlers in the West Bank are five “effective factors” in expanding the depth and scope of security threats in this region.

Regarding the war in Gaza, the story is noticeable Because a significant part of today’s security and military issues and problems of the Zionists in the West Bank are caused by the crimes they commit in the Gaza Strip.

The second factor is the “passive” and sometimes “inhibitory” policies of the Palestinian Authority in the face of the Gaza war. The adoption of such policies and behaviors, which sometimes strengthen the position of the Zionist regime, has further intensified the process of “divergence” of the residents of this region with the self-governing organizations and further “convergence” with the Islamic resistance and Hamas.

The third factor is the “intensification of military operations” of the Zionist army against the residents of the West Bank. There is evidence that shows that the Zionist regime, which has failed in Gaza, is trying to move the “center of gravity” of its operations from Gaza to the West Bank. This issue has caused the Islamic Jihad to state all Palestinians living in the West Bank to rise against the Zionists in the occupied West Bank against the “forced migration plan and genocide of the Palestinian nation.”

The fourth factor is the “aids of the Islamic Resistance Front.” After years of witnessing the organization of Hamas’s military infrastructure and the production of its short-range missiles, it has become more evident, clearly indicating the depth of the security threats against the Zionist regime from this area.

The fifth factor is the violence caused by the “arming of the settlers” by the Zionists. The arming of the settlers started last year by order of “Itamar Ben Goyer,” the Minister of Internal Security of the Zionist regime.

According to official statistics, since the beginning of the Gaza war, more than 330,000 requests for weapons permits have been submitted. In this regard, 140,000 permits have been handed over to Zionist applicants, including those who live in West Bank settlements.

In the past ten months, settler violence and cabinet-sponsored demolition frenzy in the West Bank have displaced around 1,260 Palestinians from their homes in Bedouin villages such as Umm al-Khair. This is while 1,250 attacks have been recorded by settlers in the West Bank since the beginning of the Gaza war, which is an average of four attacks per day.

According to statistics, about 120 of these attacks resulted in the death or injury of Palestinians, and about 1,000 of them caused damage to Palestinian property.

The increase in the process of arming extremist settlers, which has caused “violent attacks” on Palestinians, is done with the aim of “creating terror” among civilians and “displacing them” to “occupy Palestinian lands.” However, the field and security developments show that this issue has not only not achieved its set goals and objectives but has made the security situation in the West Bank more complicated and has put the Zionists in a “difficult situation.”

Even though the leaders of the Zionist regime thought that by arming the settlers and forming an “informal army” that would play the role of the army’s infantry, they could use them as an auxiliary arm of the military forces when the main army is engaged in a massive war with the Palestinians in Gaza, and security in the West Bank and put the residents of this area in a tight spot, still, in practice, they have faced the opposite results and harmful consequences.

Of course, it was already predictable that no matter how much the Zionist regime insisted on arming the Zionist settlers in the West Bank and continued this policy, it would face many problems and threats.

The mentioned factors have caused the West Bank to be on the verge of a “big explosion.” So, the political and security circles of the Zionist regime publicly warned about the occurrence of the “Third Intifada” or the “Repeat of Al-Aqsa Storm” in another form in this region.

Despite the actions of the Zionist regime to prevent the occurrence of terrible security incidents, if the war in Gaza does not stop and the settlers and the army of the criminal regime continue their attacks and engage in violence, the situation in the West Bank can deteriorate rapidly and become a “serious strategic challenge” for the Zionist regime.

0 Comments

LATEST CONTENT

An Analysis of the Riyadh Meeting on Palestine

Strategic Council Online – Interview: Saudi Arabia last Wednesday hosted the first meeting of a global alliance to push for a two-state solution to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. An expert on regional issues called the Saudi move an attempt to justify and compensate for the country’s weak position regarding the developments in Gaza.

The prospect of Turning BRICS Money into a Globally Accepted Currency

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The recent BRICS meeting ended with a symbolic image of the BRICS currency in the hands of Russian President Vladimir Putin. Perhaps, before this meeting, some experts did not believe in continuing BRICS as a block (or newly emerging network). Although India’s veto of Turkey’s membership showed that BRICS has a relatively long way to go to gain power from the expansion channel of the alliance, views on BRICS show it to be largely successful. BRICS money and its display in Putin’s hands are signs of seriousness in BRICS and its increasing importance in the future.

Is the Inter-Afghan Meeting in Istanbul the Think Tank of the Doha Summit?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: On Thursday and Friday, November 10th and 11th, around 50 political activists and officials of the former government of Afghanistan gathered in a two-day meeting in Istanbul, Turkey, behind closed doors, to discuss the possibility of resuming the “Inter-Afghan negotiations. The meeting was held with the support of the Turkish government and at the initiative of the “National Dialogue Forum.” The Forum was established by Hekmat Karzai, Mostafa Mastoor, Zabihullah Ziyarmal, Nabila Mosleh, Idris Zaman, Ayoub Irfani, and Freema Nawabi, former officials of the Afghan government in 2022.

An Analysis on Recent Visit of US Special Envoy to Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: There are important goals and reasons regarding the recent visit of “Amos Hochstein,” the special envoy of the US President to Lebanon. Based on the leaked details of Hochstein’s talks with the Lebanese authorities, as well as the perception of the nature of recent American policies in Lebanon, it appears that finding “new mechanisms” to implement Resolution 1701 with a new approach is the “main goal” behind the trip of Joe Biden’s special envoy to Beirut.

BRICS Role in Realization of New World Order

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: BRICS, within the framework of “positive” and not “negative” policies, without violating or opposing the principles and order-building components based on the United Nations Charter, is looking for new arrangements that govern political and economic paradigms, security, etc., has challenged America and the liberal system in today’s world.

US Stance on Military Tension between Iran & Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: When the Israeli regime crosses all red lines under the pretext of defending its existence, Iran too will have no red line in defending its vital interests.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

An Analysis of the Riyadh Meeting on Palestine

Strategic Council Online – Interview: Saudi Arabia last Wednesday hosted the first meeting of a global alliance to push for a two-state solution to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. An expert on regional issues called the Saudi move an attempt to justify and compensate for the country’s weak position regarding the developments in Gaza.

The prospect of Turning BRICS Money into a Globally Accepted Currency

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The recent BRICS meeting ended with a symbolic image of the BRICS currency in the hands of Russian President Vladimir Putin. Perhaps, before this meeting, some experts did not believe in continuing BRICS as a block (or newly emerging network). Although India’s veto of Turkey’s membership showed that BRICS has a relatively long way to go to gain power from the expansion channel of the alliance, views on BRICS show it to be largely successful. BRICS money and its display in Putin’s hands are signs of seriousness in BRICS and its increasing importance in the future.

Is the Inter-Afghan Meeting in Istanbul the Think Tank of the Doha Summit?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: On Thursday and Friday, November 10th and 11th, around 50 political activists and officials of the former government of Afghanistan gathered in a two-day meeting in Istanbul, Turkey, behind closed doors, to discuss the possibility of resuming the “Inter-Afghan negotiations. The meeting was held with the support of the Turkish government and at the initiative of the “National Dialogue Forum.” The Forum was established by Hekmat Karzai, Mostafa Mastoor, Zabihullah Ziyarmal, Nabila Mosleh, Idris Zaman, Ayoub Irfani, and Freema Nawabi, former officials of the Afghan government in 2022.

An Analysis on Recent Visit of US Special Envoy to Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: There are important goals and reasons regarding the recent visit of “Amos Hochstein,” the special envoy of the US President to Lebanon. Based on the leaked details of Hochstein’s talks with the Lebanese authorities, as well as the perception of the nature of recent American policies in Lebanon, it appears that finding “new mechanisms” to implement Resolution 1701 with a new approach is the “main goal” behind the trip of Joe Biden’s special envoy to Beirut.

BRICS Role in Realization of New World Order

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: BRICS, within the framework of “positive” and not “negative” policies, without violating or opposing the principles and order-building components based on the United Nations Charter, is looking for new arrangements that govern political and economic paradigms, security, etc., has challenged America and the liberal system in today’s world.

US Stance on Military Tension between Iran & Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: When the Israeli regime crosses all red lines under the pretext of defending its existence, Iran too will have no red line in defending its vital interests.

Loading