Behind the scenes of the Zionist regime’s attacks on Syria

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Repeated missile attacks on Syria can have several goals, including maintaining the atmosphere of tension, measuring Syrian air defense systems and radars, supporting terrorists, etc., but the coincidence of these attacks with the internal crisis of the Zionist regime strengthens this hypothesis and proves that this regime has resorted to the policy of "exporting a severe internal crisis.” Hamid Khoshayand—Expert in regional issues

The establishment of the extremist government of Benjamin Netanyahu has practically put the Zionist regime in a “difficult situation.” Since January 21, 2023, a total of more than 2 million Zionist residents of the occupied territories have protested against Netanyahu’s so-called reform policies in various cities and demanded the dismantling of applicable laws and regulations and Netanyahu’s resignation of power, which is unprecedented in the history of the Zionist regime.

It is the first time that the Zionist regime has experienced a “complex crisis” from within and several political, security, social, and demographic layers, so that today, talk of “civil war and collapse” has become a “pervasive discourse” within the security institutions, political assemblies and research centers of the Zionist regime.

A significant part of this internal crisis has resulted from the “performance of Netanyahu’s cabinet,” which has even caused the “intensification of migration” of Zionists from the occupied lands. Regarding political psychology, Netanyahu is a very “totalitarian” person who is infatuated with power and does not exchange it for anything.

Netanyahu, who does everything to stay in power, in recent weeks, when he saw his political life in a sharp turn and in a “big abyss” in which there is a possibility of falling at any moment, resorted to his “old method” to escape from the crisis, i.e., creating fear by highlighting foreign developments.

In other words, the unprecedented socio-political crisis and its destructive consequences, which have brought the Zionist regime to the brink of civil war, have caused Netanyahu to resort to foreign enemies more than ever to divert public opinion and domestic opposition from the internal crisis. In this way, while advancing his desired policies, he can take advantage of the phobia from the resistance and Iranophobia project to prevent his extremist government’s fall.

In this regard, the Zionist regime has been active in two areas in the last few weeks; First, accusing the Islamic Republic of Iran of planning an alleged terrorist operation to attack an Israeli restaurant in Athens, the capital of Greece, which was based on lies and conspiracy.

Second, conducting successive air attacks on centers in Damascus and other Syrian cities. Repetition of missile attacks on Syria can have several purposes, including maintaining the atmosphere of tension, measuring Syrian air defense systems and radars, supporting terrorists, etc. Still, the coincidence of these attacks with the internal crisis of the Zionist regime strengthens and proves this hypothesis that this regime has resorted to the policy of “distracting public opinion from the severe domestic crisis.”

Therefore, the publication of fake reports about Iran, similar to what we saw in Greece, as well as the attack of Zionist fighters on different areas of Syria, is a “scenario” to divert public opinion from the internal crisis of this regime and to try to cover up the internal developments of the occupied territories.

Netanyahu’s cabinet, which is under severe pressure to step down from power or amend and change reform policies, is forced to have tension-causing changes in its surrounding environment to advance policies and stay in power; A policy that, in general, the extreme rightists, who are sometimes not present in the cabinet, as well as the opposing currents and the opposition, believe in it, because maintaining the political existence of the Zionist regime is the main priority of all political parties, currents and groups in the Zionist regime.

With these interpretations, the “vigilance” of countries and Islamic resistance groups is essential in facing the recent actions and scenarios of the Zionist regime because they are mainly carried out to provoke the other parties to respond.

At the current stage, the Zionist regime is desperately seeking to “incite” Syria and the Islamic resistance groups to “military response” and thus start a new round of cross-border conflicts to cover up internal crises and divert public opinion inside and in the region and overshadow and sideline the outstanding achievements of Syria and the ten-year failure of the US, the Zionist regime and some European countries in Syria with a new conflict.

Of course, this does not mean passivity or appeasement in front of the aggressive actions of the Zionist regime in Syria, Iran, or Lebanon. Instead, the main point is that in the current situation, in which the Zionist regime is on the verge of “explosion” and “suicide” from within, according to Israeli leaders and strategists, any reaction to it must be measured and intelligent and accompanied by accurate evaluations of its results. To avoid playing on the ground of the Zionist regime or enlarging the playground of this regime in the region.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

An Analysis of the Riyadh Meeting on Palestine

Strategic Council Online – Interview: Saudi Arabia last Wednesday hosted the first meeting of a global alliance to push for a two-state solution to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. An expert on regional issues called the Saudi move an attempt to justify and compensate for the country’s weak position regarding the developments in Gaza.

The prospect of Turning BRICS Money into a Globally Accepted Currency

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The recent BRICS meeting ended with a symbolic image of the BRICS currency in the hands of Russian President Vladimir Putin. Perhaps, before this meeting, some experts did not believe in continuing BRICS as a block (or newly emerging network). Although India’s veto of Turkey’s membership showed that BRICS has a relatively long way to go to gain power from the expansion channel of the alliance, views on BRICS show it to be largely successful. BRICS money and its display in Putin’s hands are signs of seriousness in BRICS and its increasing importance in the future.

Is the Inter-Afghan Meeting in Istanbul the Think Tank of the Doha Summit?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: On Thursday and Friday, November 10th and 11th, around 50 political activists and officials of the former government of Afghanistan gathered in a two-day meeting in Istanbul, Turkey, behind closed doors, to discuss the possibility of resuming the “Inter-Afghan negotiations. The meeting was held with the support of the Turkish government and at the initiative of the “National Dialogue Forum.” The Forum was established by Hekmat Karzai, Mostafa Mastoor, Zabihullah Ziyarmal, Nabila Mosleh, Idris Zaman, Ayoub Irfani, and Freema Nawabi, former officials of the Afghan government in 2022.

An Analysis on Recent Visit of US Special Envoy to Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: There are important goals and reasons regarding the recent visit of “Amos Hochstein,” the special envoy of the US President to Lebanon. Based on the leaked details of Hochstein’s talks with the Lebanese authorities, as well as the perception of the nature of recent American policies in Lebanon, it appears that finding “new mechanisms” to implement Resolution 1701 with a new approach is the “main goal” behind the trip of Joe Biden’s special envoy to Beirut.

BRICS Role in Realization of New World Order

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: BRICS, within the framework of “positive” and not “negative” policies, without violating or opposing the principles and order-building components based on the United Nations Charter, is looking for new arrangements that govern political and economic paradigms, security, etc., has challenged America and the liberal system in today’s world.

US Stance on Military Tension between Iran & Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: When the Israeli regime crosses all red lines under the pretext of defending its existence, Iran too will have no red line in defending its vital interests.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

An Analysis of the Riyadh Meeting on Palestine

Strategic Council Online – Interview: Saudi Arabia last Wednesday hosted the first meeting of a global alliance to push for a two-state solution to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. An expert on regional issues called the Saudi move an attempt to justify and compensate for the country’s weak position regarding the developments in Gaza.

The prospect of Turning BRICS Money into a Globally Accepted Currency

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The recent BRICS meeting ended with a symbolic image of the BRICS currency in the hands of Russian President Vladimir Putin. Perhaps, before this meeting, some experts did not believe in continuing BRICS as a block (or newly emerging network). Although India’s veto of Turkey’s membership showed that BRICS has a relatively long way to go to gain power from the expansion channel of the alliance, views on BRICS show it to be largely successful. BRICS money and its display in Putin’s hands are signs of seriousness in BRICS and its increasing importance in the future.

Is the Inter-Afghan Meeting in Istanbul the Think Tank of the Doha Summit?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: On Thursday and Friday, November 10th and 11th, around 50 political activists and officials of the former government of Afghanistan gathered in a two-day meeting in Istanbul, Turkey, behind closed doors, to discuss the possibility of resuming the “Inter-Afghan negotiations. The meeting was held with the support of the Turkish government and at the initiative of the “National Dialogue Forum.” The Forum was established by Hekmat Karzai, Mostafa Mastoor, Zabihullah Ziyarmal, Nabila Mosleh, Idris Zaman, Ayoub Irfani, and Freema Nawabi, former officials of the Afghan government in 2022.

An Analysis on Recent Visit of US Special Envoy to Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: There are important goals and reasons regarding the recent visit of “Amos Hochstein,” the special envoy of the US President to Lebanon. Based on the leaked details of Hochstein’s talks with the Lebanese authorities, as well as the perception of the nature of recent American policies in Lebanon, it appears that finding “new mechanisms” to implement Resolution 1701 with a new approach is the “main goal” behind the trip of Joe Biden’s special envoy to Beirut.

BRICS Role in Realization of New World Order

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: BRICS, within the framework of “positive” and not “negative” policies, without violating or opposing the principles and order-building components based on the United Nations Charter, is looking for new arrangements that govern political and economic paradigms, security, etc., has challenged America and the liberal system in today’s world.

US Stance on Military Tension between Iran & Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: When the Israeli regime crosses all red lines under the pretext of defending its existence, Iran too will have no red line in defending its vital interests.

Loading