loader image

White House Concern about Implications of Extremist Israeli Govt. for US Regional Strategy

Strategic Council Online - Interview: An expert on Israeli affairs said that the majority of American Jews are inclined towards Democrats with liberal views and would not tolerate the Israeli government act in such a right-leaning, extremist and pseudo-fascist manner. He added: The United States will be worried when the governments that work within the framework of laying the foundations for the normalization of relations, because of Israel’s extremist measures, go towards tension with Tel Aviv.

In an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, Ali Abdi, referred to the negotiations between the United States and the Arab countries of the region to justify and contain the extreme policies of the new cabinet of the Zionist regime led by Netanyahu and stated: the Biden administration, considering its regional approach, is not after escalating tensions in the occupied territories. This administration, unlike the Trump administration, while trying to solve the Palestinian issue in favor of the Israelis, seeks a two-state structure and a peaceful solution to the problem in its declared policies.

Recalling that the Obama administration also had such a policy, he pointed to an article published by an Israeli analyst in the Haaretz newspaper, which described “shock and surprise mixed with concern” as Washington’s outlook towards the results of the Zionist regime’s elections and the image of its new cabinet and added: In the current situation, any tension and crisis, even in a completely one-sided way, in which the fault of the Zionist regime is clear to the public opinion of the world and Western countries, will disrupt the policy and approach of the Biden administration towards the Palestinian issue. Therefore, the US government does not welcome such conditions; as it expressed its displeasure with the ministerial position of “Ben-Gvir” from the very beginning.

The expert on the Zionist regime affairs, stating that escalation of such conditions, especially the conditions that lead to conflicts uncontrollable by any of the parties, is a threat and danger for the US, noted: The US will face challenge with Netanyahu’s government, and Netanyahu considering the situation that the United States does not have a unified support for it regarding the Palestinian issue, tries to have a pragmatic policy towards the issue so that it can both gain the satisfaction of his cabinet and the relative satisfaction of the Americans; but the future will show how far Netanyahu can achieve such an objective.

Referring to the history of tensions between Netanyahu’s government and previous democratic governments in the US, Abdi added: A gap has been created between the United States and the Zionist regime, before Biden’s trip to the occupied territories, this gap was also clear, and during that trip, the meeting between Biden and Netanyahu had its edges. On the other hand, in this regard, it should be kept in mind that the majority of American Jews are inclined towards Democrats with liberal views, and they do not tolerate that the Israeli government act in such a right-leaning, extremist and quasi-fascist manner.

Saying that the challenge of this government with the American Jews was fully reflected in the statement of Isaac Herzog, the president of the Zionist regime, that after the election of Netanyahu and formation of the government, he addressed the American Jewish community and asked them not to have a harsh approach towards that government and do not act indiscriminately, he continued: Herzog believes that the proper interaction of the American Jewish community with that government will help to reduce the existing gap. In fact, they themselves acknowledge the existence of that gap.

Emphasizing that the strategic and systematic relationship and cooperation between the power structure in the United States and the Zionist regime should be considered apart from the current gap between the two governments, he referred to the internal protests of the residents of the occupied territories, the gap between them and the concern about the impact of the extremist and racist positions of the members of the new cabinet on their lives and said: The US has concerns about some possible actions of the Zionist regime in the future. Of course, this concern is not about violating the rights of the Palestinians and oppressing them, their concern is about the disruption of the regional strategy and policy and challenging it by the right-leaning and extremism of the new government in Israel.

At the same time, he explained: The level of cooperation between Israel and the US, as well as some Arab countries, especially in the military and security fields, is beyond the cooperation between governments and does not change with the change of governments. There are secret governments in the US and Israel that carry out secret relations. Of course, regarding “adaptation” or the normalization process, no message has been issued by the respective governments that could have a critical approach towards the new government in Israel. In addition, in connection with martyr “Khairy Alqam” operations, unfortunately, a number of Arab and Muslim governments, including Turkey, condemned it. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the current Iraqi government also condemned this measure, which was very surprising.

The expert on the Zionist regime affairs, referring to the reports regarding the increase of deserting soldiers in Israel after the right-wing parties came to power, due to concerns about the security and military policies of Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich and the possibility of crossing the red line of many Zionists, said: The US gets worried when the governments that work within the framework of normalization of relations, go towards tension with Israel; but when they not only do not express their quittance of Israel’s terrorist activities and are not concerned but even support them, it does not cause any concern for the US.

Abdi continued: Netanyahu’s policy of laying the groundwork for the normalization of relations is part of the current commonality in the US administrations, and for this reason, the Israelis are in harmony with the Biden administration and are advancing the work. Regarding the issue of dealing with the Palestinians, especially the West Bank and settlement building, and exerting pressure and harassment beyond what was accepted and agreed upon in the Oslo framework, measures may be taken that cause concern. Of course, it should be kept in mind that the US usually does not take practical action against the Zionists in such cases beyond verbal criticism. Finally, it will be directed to verbal reminders and we will not witness protesting and warning measures.

Referring to the efforts of settlers and extreme right Zionist parties to expand settlements and legalize more than 70 settlement construction operations and carry out violent operations against Palestinian buildings and facilities in the West Bank, he said: I doubt even the Biden administration, due to being under pressure of the Jewish power lobbies in the US, beyond expressing concern, take practical action; Because in this case, in the election it will be threatened by the Israeli lobby in the US.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

New EU Strategy on Cooperation with the Persian Gulf, Its Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Guest Opinion: Normalization of Iran-Saudi relations with China’s mediation, which is an indication of Beijing’s more significant influence and role in new regional trends in the Middle East, increased speculations about the possibility of changes in the geostrategy of other powers.
Abbas Aslani – Expert on international relations

Foreign Policy Challenges of the New Greek Government

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the holding of the national elections in Greece on May 21, although the winning party announced priorities of its future government to be mainly improvement of the economic situation, the continuation of the national policy in foreign relations, security, and immigration would be most important challenges for this EU and NATO member country. Although the new leaders defend the continuation of the foreign and defense policy, strengthening of the country’s armed forces, creation of solid alliances, and development of the weapons program over the past four years, they differ in the field of energy exploration, the militarization of some islands in the Aegean Sea, and the issue of refugees.
Mahmoud Fazeli – International Affairs analyst

Arming Taiwan, One of the US Pressure Levers against China

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An analyst of international affairs called the provision of various types of US military-armament aid to Taiwan one of the foundations of Washington’ towards that island and said: The Chinese have intelligently realized that the US measures must be accompanied by proportionate reactions to make them fully understand that Beijing will not sit idly by the expansion of US-Taiwan relations and the increasing dispatch of US weapons to Taiwan.

What is the new position of the dollar in the global economy?

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: The confrontation between Americanization and the Chineseization of the world has created a new acting field. While the Chinese side’s efforts to reduce the international power of the dollar and increase the global acceptance of the yuan have an increasing trend, it is not possible to correctly analyze and scenarioize the possible futures of this confrontation and the new arena of acting by relying on emotional and exaggerated reactions, and of course far from scientific neutrality.
Reza Majidzadeh—Researcher of economics

Fate of Afghanistan under Shadow of Taliban-Intl. Community Conflict

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A researcher on Afghanistan affairs, criticizing the weak role and performance of the United Nations regarding Afghanistan, emphasized: The difference of views, heterogeneous and different performances of countries regarding Afghanistan, along with the weak role of the United Nations, have completed the cycle of failure and in this situation, with the increasing risk of isolation of the Taliban, their leadership is gaining more power.

Establishing Chinese order in the region is one of the strategic goals of the Islamabad meeting

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on Asian issues considered the tripartite meeting in Islamabad regarding Afghanistan as another Chinese initiative to establish peace and stability in the region by using economic tools, adding that this meeting arose from the security concerns of Pakistan and China concerning the realization of their political and economic interests in Afghanistan.

The strategic importance of resuming relations between Iran and Egypt

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: After the resumption of diplomatic relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia created a wave of positive developments in the region and encouraged other Persian Gulf countries to resume or strengthen ties with the Islamic Republic of Iran, now the news indicates that Iran and Egypt with the mediation of Iraq are trying to resume diplomatic relations.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University scholar

Strategic Importance of Organizing Legal Acceptance of Afghans in Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: Former official in charge of Afghanistan Support Headquarters at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said: Iranian people are witnessing the high and unusual presence of Afghan refugees, adding that vigilance is needed concerning their presence in the strategic context of cities, as well as to the possibility of targeted organization and possible use of them against the interests and security of Iran.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

New EU Strategy on Cooperation with the Persian Gulf, Its Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Guest Opinion: Normalization of Iran-Saudi relations with China’s mediation, which is an indication of Beijing’s more significant influence and role in new regional trends in the Middle East, increased speculations about the possibility of changes in the geostrategy of other powers.
Abbas Aslani – Expert on international relations

Foreign Policy Challenges of the New Greek Government

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With the holding of the national elections in Greece on May 21, although the winning party announced priorities of its future government to be mainly improvement of the economic situation, the continuation of the national policy in foreign relations, security, and immigration would be most important challenges for this EU and NATO member country. Although the new leaders defend the continuation of the foreign and defense policy, strengthening of the country’s armed forces, creation of solid alliances, and development of the weapons program over the past four years, they differ in the field of energy exploration, the militarization of some islands in the Aegean Sea, and the issue of refugees.
Mahmoud Fazeli – International Affairs analyst

Arming Taiwan, One of the US Pressure Levers against China

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An analyst of international affairs called the provision of various types of US military-armament aid to Taiwan one of the foundations of Washington’ towards that island and said: The Chinese have intelligently realized that the US measures must be accompanied by proportionate reactions to make them fully understand that Beijing will not sit idly by the expansion of US-Taiwan relations and the increasing dispatch of US weapons to Taiwan.

What is the new position of the dollar in the global economy?

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: The confrontation between Americanization and the Chineseization of the world has created a new acting field. While the Chinese side’s efforts to reduce the international power of the dollar and increase the global acceptance of the yuan have an increasing trend, it is not possible to correctly analyze and scenarioize the possible futures of this confrontation and the new arena of acting by relying on emotional and exaggerated reactions, and of course far from scientific neutrality.
Reza Majidzadeh—Researcher of economics

Fate of Afghanistan under Shadow of Taliban-Intl. Community Conflict

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A researcher on Afghanistan affairs, criticizing the weak role and performance of the United Nations regarding Afghanistan, emphasized: The difference of views, heterogeneous and different performances of countries regarding Afghanistan, along with the weak role of the United Nations, have completed the cycle of failure and in this situation, with the increasing risk of isolation of the Taliban, their leadership is gaining more power.

Establishing Chinese order in the region is one of the strategic goals of the Islamabad meeting

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on Asian issues considered the tripartite meeting in Islamabad regarding Afghanistan as another Chinese initiative to establish peace and stability in the region by using economic tools, adding that this meeting arose from the security concerns of Pakistan and China concerning the realization of their political and economic interests in Afghanistan.

The strategic importance of resuming relations between Iran and Egypt

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: After the resumption of diplomatic relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia created a wave of positive developments in the region and encouraged other Persian Gulf countries to resume or strengthen ties with the Islamic Republic of Iran, now the news indicates that Iran and Egypt with the mediation of Iraq are trying to resume diplomatic relations.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University scholar

Strategic Importance of Organizing Legal Acceptance of Afghans in Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: Former official in charge of Afghanistan Support Headquarters at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said: Iranian people are witnessing the high and unusual presence of Afghan refugees, adding that vigilance is needed concerning their presence in the strategic context of cities, as well as to the possibility of targeted organization and possible use of them against the interests and security of Iran.

Loading