Strategic Implications of Hezbollah’s Recent Show of Power over Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online - Opinion: Hezbollah in Lebanon is demonstrating new dimensions of its new operational tactics every day. The recent Hezbollah drone operation over key parts of the Occupied Territories in the north of the Occupied Territories, which flew for identification purposes, is one of Hezbollah’s strategic measures in the field of advancing the “strategic confrontation” of the Islamic Resistance with the Zionist regime. Barsam Mohammadi – Expert on regional issues

The drone, named “Hassan”, returned to its base after flying for about 40 minutes at a depth of 70 km in occupied Palestine. However, all attempts by the Zionist regime’s defense systems and air force, such as the Iron Dome, F-16 fighters and the Apache helicopters failed to shoot down the drone.

The recent operation of Hezbollah reconnaissance drones in occupied Palestine has important strategic “messages” and “consequences” in political, military, economic, etc. dimensions, the most important of which are as follows:

One: This incident shows that Hezbollah, which is an important part of the body of Islamic Resistance in the region, has practically become one of the main owners of “smart, advanced and operational” drones in the world, which can be worrying for the Zionist regime.

Many countries in the region, despite their large military expenditures and tens of billions of dollars in annual purchases, still do not have the capacity to compete with Hezbollah in terms of advanced manufacturing technology, mass production, and the use of drones.

Existing estimates show that Hezbollah’s missile and drone capability with more than 2,000 drones and 150,000 missiles is more than 95% of the countries.

Two: The Iron Dome is a very expensive multi-layered missile defense system that the Zionist regime has spent hundreds of millions of dollars over the past decade to compensate for vulnerabilities and counter missile and drone threats. In recent years, some of the Persian Gulf Arab regimes have offered to pay for the Iron Dome by paying large sums of money, along with political, military, security and economic commitments to Tel Aviv.

Given that Hezbollah is well aware of the way to pass through this defense system, and recently managed to pass Hassan Drone through this system, this measure is a “gross defeat” for the Iron Dome of the Zionist regime, which will disappoint some Arab governments in the region that have been looking for years to ensure their security through the establishment of the said system in their country. As the head of the Yemeni Supreme Revolutionary Committee recently tweeted: The Zionist usurpers have suggested to the UAE that they use their [Zionist] missile systems to shoot down Yemeni drones and missiles. Now, after the Hezbollah drone reconnaissance operation in the depths of the occupied territories, we address the Zionists: If you are right, you are more deserving for using missile systems.

Three: From an economic point of view, the arrival of Hezbollah drones in occupied Palestine fundamentally calls into question the huge sums that the Zionist regime has spent in recent years on equipping, improving and upgrading its military, air force and defense systems infrastructures.

In addition to the Iron Dome, the Zionist regime flew its F-16 fighter jets and Apache helicopters to intercept Hezbollah drone, but failed to shoot it down. The flight of an F-16 fighter jet costs more than 22,000 dollars per hour, an Apache helicopter flight costs 5,000 dollars per hour, and each missile fired from the Iron Dome costs about 50,000 dollars for the Zionist army!

Fourth: Applying a new “balance of terror” in the occupied territories and against the Zionist regime is the next important consequence in this regard. Given that strengthening the “deterrence equation” and shifting the balance of terror and power in the occupied territories in favor of the Islamic Resistance is one of Hezbollah’s key goals in recent operations, therefore, it seems that such goals are being achieved.

Maintaining and strengthening the balance of terror is a policy that Hezbollah is relying on to undermine the security doctrines of the Zionist regime. The arrival of a drone in occupied Palestine, near Tel Aviv, was enough to completely question the security doctrines and the claims of the Zionist authorities against the Islamic Resistance.

Five: Strengthening the process of vulnerability of the Zionist regime and showing the inefficiency of its air force is the next important consequence in this regard. Even the Zionist regime’s security circles have announced that the regime is no longer capable of countering the drones and missiles of the Lebanese Islamic Resistance. What will a regime that cannot prevent a drone from entering the airspace of occupied Palestine do in the face of tens and perhaps hundreds of suicide and war drones that may enter the occupied territories from different places at an appropriate time?!

Six: The weakening of psychological security of public opinion and the inhabitants of the occupied territories is another important consequence that cannot be ignored. A survey on the media and public opinion inside the Zionist regime shows that despite the elapse of several days of Hezbollah drone operations, there is still great fear in the Zionist regime’s army and security institutions about the issue of drones and the inability of the Iron Dome to intercept them.

Increased fear and panic in the public opinion and the inhabitants of the occupied lands, especially the settlers, is a problem that can paralyze the project of expanding the settlement in the occupied lands. Living in areas and towns where the safety of its inhabitants is damaged and faced with disturbance, is psychologically very costly which may also lead to the spread of political protests.

The issue of Islamic Resistance’s drones becomes even more important when we know that the trend of battles of the Islamic Resistance with the Zionist regime are moving more intensely from “human-centered” towards “equipment-oriented”.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

Loading