Resumption of Turkey’s Diplomatic Relations with Zionist Regime and Resentment of Palestinians

Strategic Council Online - Opinion: One of the “obvious paradoxes” that has been noticed in the foreign policy of the Turkish government for many years is its claim of supporting the Palestinian people’s aspirations while on the other hand attempting to expand relations with the Zionist regime. This issue has not only caused “infuriation and resentment of the Palestinian people” against the Turkish government, but has also raised questions in the public opinion of the region and the Islamic world against Ankara’s protectionist approaches to Palestine! Hamid Khoshayand - Researcher on regional affairs

Political relations between Turkey and the Zionist regime have become warmer after Erdogan’s recent expression of interest in “reviving bilateral political relations”, and the Zionist regime’s visit to Ankara. Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu also held a telephone conversation with Israeli Foreign Minister Yair Lapid for the first time after 13 years.

Although relations between Turkey and the Zionist regime have been severed politically and diplomatically for the past 12 years, there were cooperation in the trade, economic, and even military, intelligence, and tourism fields.

Now the Turkish government, in addition to trying to revive bilateral relations, seeks to establish relations beyond the usual diplomatic relations. Erdogan has suggested that Ankara and Tel Aviv work together to transfer the Zionist regime’s natural gas to Europe from Turkey! Negotiations on the Zionist-Turkish “gas pipeline” began in 2016, but have not yet yielded the desired results.

While the Turkish government seeks to rebuild political relations with the Zionist regime, a spokesman for Isaac Herzog, head of the Zionist regime, said in a thought-provoking statement: We will proceed with Turkey very carefully, very slowly. We must not commit ourselves to some kind of purity.

The important point in reviving bilateral relations is that the party that has taken the lead is the Turkish government. Turkey has even removed Palestinian issues from the revival of bilateral relations. With that in mind, Herzog’s spokesman’s remarks are perfectly normal; the Zionist regime, which in recent years has established covert and overt relations with some Arab countries, no longer needs Turkey strategically as in the past. Although Turkey is seeking an “economic” or perhaps strategic “partnership” with the Zionist regime, such an approach is not seen in Tel Aviv. It is enough for Tel Aviv to revive relationships at a normal level.

Turkey’s objectives to improve relations with Zionist regime

“Economy” is a key component of the Turkish government in repairing its foreign relations with Tel Aviv. In recent months, the economic indicators in Turkey have not been favorable and the inflation rate in that country has reached more than 50 percent. This is at a time when the threshold of tolerance of the Turkish people in the face of economic problems is low. Therefore, the Turkish government seeks to revive bilateral relations with the Zionist regime and, as a result, expand economic and foreign trade cooperation with the Zionist regime.

Trump’s four-year presidency was a great opportunity for the Erdogan administration. Thus, the relations between the two countries went beyond the official levels in most matters and were promoted to family trade relations. But with Biden coming to power, this four-year honeymoon is over.

Unlike in the Trump administration, the Biden administration not only pays little attention to the Turkish government, but the White House has become a serious critic of Ankara’s domestic and foreign policy. Therefore, the Turkish government is seeking the “support of the Zionist-American lobby” of the Justice and Development Party (AKP) to stay in power by reviving foreign relations with the Zionist regime.

The Zionist regime also pursues important targets in rebuilding political relations with Turkey, which are not unrelated to Turkey’s regional and international position. First, Turkey is an important member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). Second, it is “one of the three great regional powers” alongside Iran and Saudi Arabia. In addition, the Zionist regime considers Turkey a “stronghold” against the influence of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Syria.

Consequences

Turkey has begun the process of rebuilding political relations with the Zionist regime, while Palestine has maintained its stable existence. There has been no change or negligence in the Palestinian nation’s aspirations to fight the Zionist regime and liberate Holy Qods. Meanwhile, Palestine is still the number one issue in the Islamic world, of which Turkey is one of the largest, important and influential countries.

According to the results of the annual “Arab Youth’s Assessment” poll in 2021, about 88% of Muslim and Arab youth consider the Zionist regime as their enemy and believe that normalization of relations between some Arab countries and Tel Aviv has not been able to overshadow its occupation nature!

In such circumstances, Ankara extending a hand of friendship to Tel Aviv is interpreted as nothing more than “disgrace for the Turkish government”, a “major blow to Erdogan’s future and political capital” and a “growing weakening of the AKP’s position”. At the same time, Erdogan’s government and his party will face a “decline in credibility, prestige and political face” in Islamic and regional public opinion.

 

Final point

Turkey’s economic problems and crisis are temporary and can be resolved through domestic and regional measures without the need to “normalize political relations with Tel Aviv”. The fact that the Turkish government has chosen a difficult and costly path to overcome economic problems and even win the upcoming elections, especially in a situation where anti-Zionist sentiment is growing in Islamic and Arab public opinion, even inside Turkey, will not present a favorable outlook for Ankara.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

An Analysis of South Korea’s Response to Trump’s Tariff Policy

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With Donald Trump’s return to the U.S. presidency, a new wave of economic protectionism in the form of tariff policies has impacted global trade. One of the first countries targeted by these tariffs was South Korea—a nation whose economy heavily relies on exports, particularly to the American market.

Iran’s Smart Diplomacy in Managing Regional Crises

Strategic Council Online– Interview: A West Asia affairs analyst, discussing the role of Iran’s smart diplomacy in turning regional crises into opportunities to strengthen the country’s influence and position in the region, stated: Iran’s multilateral foreign policy can be an effective alternative to Western military interventions, especially at a time when the failures of the U.S. and the Israeli regime have reduced the trust of West Asian countries in them. By consciously leveraging regional capacities and strengthening cooperation, Tehran can play a pivotal role in establishing sustainable stability in the region.

Iran’s Potential Capacity in the Large Energy Market

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An energy affairs analyst stated that the recent imposed war by the Zionist regime and the U.S. against Iran, which Donald Trump described as a military success, has disrupted energy markets and intensified concerns over rising oil prices. This event once again underscored Iran’s decisive position in the oil and gas market.

Formation of a New Regional Order Through Consolidation of Iran-Arab Relations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A senior West Asia analyst stated that The Washington Post recently emphasized in a report that the attacks by the Zionist regime and the U.S. on Iran not only failed in their strategy to isolate Tehran but also altered the perspective of Persian Gulf countries regarding regional threats, identifying the Zionists as the primary destabilizing force in the region.

Reasons for NATO Members’ Agreement to the Proposed U.S. Budget Increase

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert stated that, given the Russian threat and the rise of militarism worldwide, European countries have concluded that they must cooperate with the U.S. in establishing a unified European defense shield and strengthening NATO. Consequently, they agreed to a five percent increase in NATO’s budget during the recent summit.

Domestic Concerns and Repercussions of the 12-Day War for Trump and Netanyahu

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Every war, regardless of its duration (short or long) and how it ends (ceasefire, lifting siege, or peace), faces an issue called “The Day After.” The day after the war ends refers to the day when the consequences of the war gradually become apparent to the warring parties in various spheres, including political, military, social, economic, and others. The imposed war by the Zionist regime and America against Iran is no exception to this rule.

Objectives of Western Military Support Escalation for the Zionist Regime After the Ceasefire with Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A West Asia affairs expert stated that following the imposition of a ceasefire on the Zionist regime on June 23, 2025, after its military aggression against Iran, reports from Arab sources indicate the arrival of 17 heavy transport aircraft carrying military equipment from the United States and Germany to the Occupied Territories. This move, which the Iraqi media “Naya” describes as part of Western efforts to rebuild the Zionist regime’s military capabilities after heavy losses in the 12-day war with Iran, poses a serious threat to regional peace and Iran’s nuclear negotiations.

Netanyahu’s Tactics to Evade Trial Under Pretext of Security and Regional Developments

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An Israeli regime affairs researcher stated: The Zionist regime media recently announced that Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of this regime, has requested a two-week postponement of his trial for security reasons and regional developments. On Sunday, news also emerged that the “Occupied Jerusalem” district court agreed to postpone Netanyahu’s trial by one week. This decision followed the Zionist regime Prime Minister summoning officials from the Foreign Intelligence Service (Mossad) and Military Intelligence Organization (Aman) to a confidential session held at this court to explain the reasons for his request to delay his trial by two weeks.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

An Analysis of South Korea’s Response to Trump’s Tariff Policy

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: With Donald Trump’s return to the U.S. presidency, a new wave of economic protectionism in the form of tariff policies has impacted global trade. One of the first countries targeted by these tariffs was South Korea—a nation whose economy heavily relies on exports, particularly to the American market.

Iran’s Smart Diplomacy in Managing Regional Crises

Strategic Council Online– Interview: A West Asia affairs analyst, discussing the role of Iran’s smart diplomacy in turning regional crises into opportunities to strengthen the country’s influence and position in the region, stated: Iran’s multilateral foreign policy can be an effective alternative to Western military interventions, especially at a time when the failures of the U.S. and the Israeli regime have reduced the trust of West Asian countries in them. By consciously leveraging regional capacities and strengthening cooperation, Tehran can play a pivotal role in establishing sustainable stability in the region.

Iran’s Potential Capacity in the Large Energy Market

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An energy affairs analyst stated that the recent imposed war by the Zionist regime and the U.S. against Iran, which Donald Trump described as a military success, has disrupted energy markets and intensified concerns over rising oil prices. This event once again underscored Iran’s decisive position in the oil and gas market.

Formation of a New Regional Order Through Consolidation of Iran-Arab Relations

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A senior West Asia analyst stated that The Washington Post recently emphasized in a report that the attacks by the Zionist regime and the U.S. on Iran not only failed in their strategy to isolate Tehran but also altered the perspective of Persian Gulf countries regarding regional threats, identifying the Zionists as the primary destabilizing force in the region.

Reasons for NATO Members’ Agreement to the Proposed U.S. Budget Increase

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert stated that, given the Russian threat and the rise of militarism worldwide, European countries have concluded that they must cooperate with the U.S. in establishing a unified European defense shield and strengthening NATO. Consequently, they agreed to a five percent increase in NATO’s budget during the recent summit.

Domestic Concerns and Repercussions of the 12-Day War for Trump and Netanyahu

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Every war, regardless of its duration (short or long) and how it ends (ceasefire, lifting siege, or peace), faces an issue called “The Day After.” The day after the war ends refers to the day when the consequences of the war gradually become apparent to the warring parties in various spheres, including political, military, social, economic, and others. The imposed war by the Zionist regime and America against Iran is no exception to this rule.

Objectives of Western Military Support Escalation for the Zionist Regime After the Ceasefire with Iran

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A West Asia affairs expert stated that following the imposition of a ceasefire on the Zionist regime on June 23, 2025, after its military aggression against Iran, reports from Arab sources indicate the arrival of 17 heavy transport aircraft carrying military equipment from the United States and Germany to the Occupied Territories. This move, which the Iraqi media “Naya” describes as part of Western efforts to rebuild the Zionist regime’s military capabilities after heavy losses in the 12-day war with Iran, poses a serious threat to regional peace and Iran’s nuclear negotiations.

Netanyahu’s Tactics to Evade Trial Under Pretext of Security and Regional Developments

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An Israeli regime affairs researcher stated: The Zionist regime media recently announced that Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of this regime, has requested a two-week postponement of his trial for security reasons and regional developments. On Sunday, news also emerged that the “Occupied Jerusalem” district court agreed to postpone Netanyahu’s trial by one week. This decision followed the Zionist regime Prime Minister summoning officials from the Foreign Intelligence Service (Mossad) and Military Intelligence Organization (Aman) to a confidential session held at this court to explain the reasons for his request to delay his trial by two weeks.

Loading
Samir Design Group گروه طراحی سمیر