Consequences of the U.S. & Russia Withdrawal from Open Skies Treaty

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Rising tension between the U.S. and Europe from one hand and Russia from the other hand within the recent years and months, Western parties with the U.S pivotal role are making effort to further contain the Russian economic and military influence. Abed Akbari- Expert of International Affairs

Having considered the recent and major Russian threats, Europeans have spoken the necessity to start tough measures against the country. Open Skies Treaty is the last victim of the systematic clash. This is the case while the former U.S. president Donald Trump Administration withdrew from the Treaty on November 22, 2020 claiming that Moscow employs it as an instrument to intimidate and threat against the vital U.S. and Europe infrastructures and also making reconnaissance flight over the disputed regions of Donbas and Ukraine.

Moscow was concerned that the U.S. allies might share the information collected from Russian planes with Washington.

Open skies Treaty authorizes its 33 member countries in Europe and North America to make joint and unarmed surveillance flights over each other’s territory. Before leaving the Treaty, the U.S. used to make its flights almost exclusively over Russia. According to the Spokesperson of the U.S. State Department, the country has made three times more flights over Russia than Moscow did.

This is the case while Russia makes its flights equally over all member countries and only 12% of its flights were made over the U.S. territory. In fact, the Treaty is, in principle applicable to Europe. The Treaty provides to small and medium sized countries without satellite a kind of independence and data which were not otherwise accessible.

The Treaty also acts as an opportunity to build military confidence through regular interaction with Russian officers within the framework of European security. In fact, Open Skies Treaty has had a remarkable share in providing security and stability in Europe and is focused on strengthening of confidence and security in Europe.

Moreover, the withdrawal of both countries will practically create a challenge for global effort to control arms. After the suspension of the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe by Russia and the U.S. withdrawal from Intermediate – Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF Treaty), the termination of Open Skies Treaty will be another strike to joint regional security order in Europe. The Treaty will lose its strategic objective without the intervention of the U.S. or Russia.

Its termination will also deprive the West from an instrument to build confidence with Russia and will confirm inattention to Europe in military security policy. On this basis, the architecture of European arms control which was developed during the cold war will face a serious challenge.

Particularly and regardless of continuous and clandestine clashes within the realm of the former Soviet Union which may take place any moment, aerial and naval incidents between Russia and NATO planes and vessels is considered to be another source of danger. When the Russian planes are closer to those of NATO and NATO planes fly over closer to Russian borders, grave consequences may take place in Black Sea and over Baltic Sea. NATO sorties or its naval activities in the neighborhood of Crimea and also near Kaliningrad will be dangerous.

Recent situation in Ukraine and concentration of Russian military forces along Ukraine borders within the recent days and positions taken by European and NATO authorities such as the warning issued by the European Union leaders to Moscow for any military measure against Ukraine and readiness of the European Union to impose a package of new sanctions with serious consequences upon Russia in order to confront a possible military action by Russia has also provoked the inflamed atmosphere in relations between Europe and Russia.

While Russia calls for restricted activities of Eastern European countries in NATO as well as rejection of Ukraine and Georgia demand to accede to the treaty, Europe believes that Russia through its cold war era looking, is practically calling for a veto right on the destiny of NATO members. Within the fragile status of relations between Russia and NATO, the termination of Open Skies Treaty is being understood as intensifying threat that will strike against the confidence between Europe and Russia on the military stability in Europe.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading