Dimensions, Objectives of Zionist Regime’s Threats against Iran

Strategic Council Online - Interview: An analyst of West Asia affairs, saying that the Zionist regime’s threats against Iran are more from a position of passivity and weakness since they know that they cannot take action in this regard, added: By taking advantage of such threats and influencing the atmosphere of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) talks, they now want to prevent an agreement with Iran and giving concessions to it.

Hossein Akbari, speaking in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, while referring to the repeated threats of the media and the Zionist regime to launch a military attack on Iran, noted: Recent Israeli actions and threats against Iran are from a reactionary position; because they see that Trump has been ousted from power and that the Biden administration, in the midst of negotiations, is in a situation where it has to reach an agreement with Iran, albeit a relative one.

He added: In fact, they see the passage of time in favor of Iran, and at the same time the measures they have taken so far, including political pressure and the pursuit of sanctions, although put a lot of pressure on the Iranian people, not only did not realize their targets, but had not brought them closer to their aims.

The analyst of West Asia affairs pointed to the new government’s outlook to the East in Iran and said: Iran does not see itself confined to relations with the West and the JCPOA, and in this context the Zionist regime feels that Iran is not willing to make any concessions to the Westerners to come to the negotiating table for agreement. Iran has not tied its economy to the JCPOA, and while being serious in the negotiations, it even pursues its political issues independently of the JCPOA.

Akbari continued: The Zionist regime and its supporters now have no other means against Iran, so they are in a reactionary and completely passive situation. Iran is on a path that can gain points both in the JCPOA and also solve its problem without the JCPOA; it also has a balanced view of the international arena on its agenda and is not limited to the West. On the other hand, unlike Trump, Biden has no motive to sacrifice everything to the Zionist regime, and most importantly, in the internal environment of that regime and its surrounding resistance, the military equation is in favor of resistance in the region and that regime does not have the upper hand.

Saying that the Zionist regime, within the framework of destabilizing the region and disturbing agreement, has always attempted to obstruct and sabotage, directly or indirectly, emphasized: There can be no doubt that if the United States, Europe and the Zionist regime were confident that they could achieve a result from military action and there was no obstacle on their way, certainly they would have carried out an operation against Iran.

The expert on West Asia affairs, saying that the Islamic Republic of Iran is always on a military alert, because it has always felt the threat closely and has prepared itself for it, noted: Iran is not a country that is not concerned about its surroundings or a country careless about its defensive and combat capabilities.

Silence of Intl. community before threats of the Zionist regime

Referring to the silence of the international community, governments and international and regional organizations, as well as the International Atomic Energy Agency, regarding the overt and covert threats of the Zionist regime against Iran, Akbari stressed: The international community was not able to deal with this regime from the beginning; numerous resolutions against the Zionist regime, which have been ratified by all countries, have been rejected only by the US veto in the Security Council, and the UN has never been able to assert any right when it comes to the Zionist regime.

He described the influence and power of the Zionist lobby media in the international fora and the United Nations, adding: Unfortunately, now with the inefficiency of those organizations, they are no longer expected to react against the threats of the Zionist regime; they are not able to take even the slightest position in this regard.

The analyst of West Asia affairs stated that the Zionist regime and the United States are now in the worst situation compared to their past, stressing: Those who threaten Iran today have given up land on several battlefields, in Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Afghanistan and Yemen have shamefully accepted defeat. Wherever they have encountered the Resistance to start a war and have used all the international tools and those of their allies, they have defeated.

Saying that Iran is familiar with the Zionist regime’s bragging, he said: They now want to take advantage of such threats and by influencing the atmosphere of the JCPOA talks, prevent reaching an agreement with Iran and giving concessions by the other side to us. They believe that if Iran gains a concession in the JCPOA and its economic situation improves, the power of Resistance, which has now turned into a regional front, will expand and dev rapidly; they are afraid of this.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Implications of the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Myanmar’s Leader

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Myanmar’s military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, is facing charges of committing crimes against humanity for the killing and persecution of Rohingya Muslims. The crimes, which affected more than a million people in Myanmar, took place between August and December 2017. During this period, the Myanmar military launched an operation called “clearance” under the pretext of fighting armed groups that led to the genocide of Muslims in Rakhine State in western Myanmar. This operation was accompanied by the widespread killing of more than 200,000 Rohingya Muslims and the displacement of about 700,000 people. The International Criminal Court has identified these actions as examples of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Implications of the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Myanmar’s Leader

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Myanmar’s military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, is facing charges of committing crimes against humanity for the killing and persecution of Rohingya Muslims. The crimes, which affected more than a million people in Myanmar, took place between August and December 2017. During this period, the Myanmar military launched an operation called “clearance” under the pretext of fighting armed groups that led to the genocide of Muslims in Rakhine State in western Myanmar. This operation was accompanied by the widespread killing of more than 200,000 Rohingya Muslims and the displacement of about 700,000 people. The International Criminal Court has identified these actions as examples of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

Loading