Strategic Implications of US Plane Crash in Afghanistan

Strategic Council Online: An Afghan affairs expert said the US military plane crash in Afghanistan could indicate that Washington has become so vulnerable in the region that it is hurt even by the Taliban. “If it is proved it is the work of the Taliban the US policy towards the Taliban is set to change.”

Speaking in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, Pir Mohammad Molazehi, referring to the crash of a US military aircraft in Afghanistan, noted: The US position in the region is so vulnerable that it is harmed even by the Taliban. In Iraq too, for the first time they were in a position where both the Iraqi parliament approved US military withdrawals and opposition forces regularly fired rockets at the US embassy and military bases.”

 

America’s Stature in the Region under Question!

“It was the first time that the Revolutionary Guards attacked Ein al-Assad base, a base that is very important for the Americans and the reputation they had in the region has really been called into question,” he said. If we look at the issue from this angle, the pressure for Americans to leave the region has increased. In addition, there are pressures within the US as well.”

At the same time, emphasizing that the US Embassy in Baghdad is the largest embassy in the world, which is staffed by security and military personnel, the Afghan affairs expert added: “It seems the US is unlikely to give in to pressures to evacuate Iraq and Afghanistan. Americans have strategic goals in the region and will remain there even if they have to pull out their troops. They may keep them under the cover of diplomats in these countries.”

Concerning the impact and consequences of the plane crash in Afghanistan on increasing pressure on the Trump administration, he said: “One of the issues that the Trump administration is under pressure for is the status of the US military, and the issue has become much more serious today.”

 

Trump under Pressure to Pull Troops Out

“The Americans had already planned to reduce their forces in Afghanistan. On the other hand, they were negotiating with the Taliban, and the condition of the Taliban to achieve peace is for the Americans to withdraw their troops. In Iraq, too, the parliament has approved the US troop withdrawal. Taking these events into consideration, it appears that any casualties the Americans may suffer in the region will increase pressure on Mr Trump to make a definitive decision to withdraw US troops.”

Referring to the Taliban’s claim that they had shot down the plane, Molazehi elaborated on the impact of this action on the peace talks with the Taliban and said: “Talks have been going on for a long time, and Mr Zalmai Khalilzad (on behalf of the US) and a representative of the Taliban were supposed to decide a timetable for signing the agreement. But as the Taliban claim, at the last minute, the Americans have put forward new proposals that were not acceptable to the Taliban.

US-Taliban Talks Had Reached an Impasse

“Regardless of this, there is a deadlock in the negotiations, that is the Americans insist that after the agreement between all Afghan groups, the government and the Taliban should negotiate to announce a ceasefire,” he added. The Taliban have not accepted any of these terms.

“The Taliban insists on reducing violence rather than reaching a cease-fire, and concerning negotiations with the current government, they say it is illegal and that they will not negotiate with it. So there has already been a deadlock in the talks, but if the Americans in their investigations find that the Taliban has shot down the plane, the Americans would naturally take a harder stance in the peace talks and it would be harder for the Americans to come to terms with the Taliban.

US Policy toward the Taliban May Change

Molazehi added: “The policy of the Americans may change because, in the current situation, they aim to avoid military conflict. They want American forces to just train Afghan troops and provide logistical facilities for them. If they really do find that the Taliban have downed the plane, it means that they have achieved the technical capabilities to shoot down American planes, something that will be very dangerous for the US.”

He said it may be just like the Stringers the US provided to the Mujahideen who paralyzed the former Soviet air force, the analyst said. It was then that jihad in Afghanistan progressed rapidly. However, there are many discussions about how the plane has been downed.

Noting that the downed plane was very advanced and according to experts it was flying at above 8000 feet, he said there are questions about whether the Taliban really has an anti-aircraft system to hit from such distance!

In addition, if the plane had been hit in the sky it would explode into pieces while the photos released show the Taliban could be right in claiming to have downed the plane as there are undamaged pieces which show the plane was pulled down and then hit the ground rather than being hit by a missile in the sky.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Implications of the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Myanmar’s Leader

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Myanmar’s military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, is facing charges of committing crimes against humanity for the killing and persecution of Rohingya Muslims. The crimes, which affected more than a million people in Myanmar, took place between August and December 2017. During this period, the Myanmar military launched an operation called “clearance” under the pretext of fighting armed groups that led to the genocide of Muslims in Rakhine State in western Myanmar. This operation was accompanied by the widespread killing of more than 200,000 Rohingya Muslims and the displacement of about 700,000 people. The International Criminal Court has identified these actions as examples of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Implications of the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Myanmar’s Leader

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Myanmar’s military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, is facing charges of committing crimes against humanity for the killing and persecution of Rohingya Muslims. The crimes, which affected more than a million people in Myanmar, took place between August and December 2017. During this period, the Myanmar military launched an operation called “clearance” under the pretext of fighting armed groups that led to the genocide of Muslims in Rakhine State in western Myanmar. This operation was accompanied by the widespread killing of more than 200,000 Rohingya Muslims and the displacement of about 700,000 people. The International Criminal Court has identified these actions as examples of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

Loading