Dimensions and Consequences of Egypt’s Exit from Hebrew-Arab NATO

2019/04/25 | Defense & Security, Opinion

Strategic Council Online: Saudi Arabia has tried, in addition to its Persian Gulf allies, attract Egypt as one of the Middle East powers in a coalition called the Hebrew-Arab NATO against Iran, but with Cairo’s withdrawal from the coalition Saudi Arabia and its allies have faced an impasse in creating a full-fledged anti-Iran coalition. Davood Ahmadzadeh - Middle East Affairs Expert

Publication of a report on the withdrawal of Egypt from a US-led anti-Iran coalition just one day after a cordial meeting between President al-Sisi and his American counterpart Donald Trump shows Cairo’s caution in preventing tensions with Iran. Cairo has come to the understanding that Tehran is not a threat against Cairo. Given that Egypt is the greatest military power among the Arabs, one can consider Trump’s dream of forging an anti-Iranian coalition a failed attempt.

Initially, Cairo had aligned with the Saudis in joining the Hebrew-Arab NATO and the Egyptian economy somehow depended on Saudi Arabia and the UAE petrodollars. In fact, given the severe economic crisis in Egypt and the spread of structural violence in the country despite General Sisi’s efforts to overcome the crisis, the Egyptians did not see the possibility of adopting an independent policy in the Middle East.

However, over time and with the emergence of serious disagreements on some regional issues, especially about Syria and Yemen, and General Sisi’s efforts to reduce dependence on Saudi Arabia, we are witnessing the adoption of new policies by Egypt in the region. Cairo, since the beginning of the Syrian crisis, also wanted stability and non-intervention of the military to overthrow the ruling regime in Syrian. In the Yemeni crisis too, Riyadh’s pressure on Cairo to make a greater military contribution in attacking Yemen and defeating Houthi forces has failed.

Thus, in line with pursuing Iranophobia wave by Saudi Arabia, Riyadh strived to check Iran’s influence by involving powerful Arab countries and linking the issue to the interests of Israel, but now Egypt has adopted a policy of non-intervention or, at least, a lack of serious involvement in crisis-prone zones in the Middle East.

Thus, with stabilization of the situation in Syria, the sustainability of power in Iraq and the expansion of Iran’s influence in the Middle East, the Egyptians have also acknowledged the effective role Iran plays to influence crisis management in the region. With these explanations, Cairo is likely to keep further away from Riyadh in the Middle East and adopt more independent policies.

On the other hand, considering the capabilities of Russia, Turkey and Iran as the three influential countries in Syria and the region, the Egyptians, by moving away from the Western and Arab axis in the anti-Iranian coalition, are trying to improve their economic and political relations with these three key players in the region. From this perspective, it can be said that from in view of the Egyptian military, the failure to join the Hebrew-Arab NATO could have a negative impact on economic and reconstruction aids Cairo receives in the short term. But in the near future, with the stabilization of the region, the Egyptians can take a larger share of the economic pie.

There are a few points about the idea of ​​creating the Hebrew-Arab NATO: After the outbreak of many crises in the Middle East in line with Donald Trump’s anti-Iranian policies in the region, creation of Saudi-Israeli alliances against Iran was placed on the agenda of the White House security team.

In this regard, the Americans have been working to establish a direct link between the authorities in Riyadh, Tel Aviv and neighbouring allies in the Middle East in order to block the strategy of Iran’s influence in the Middle East. Therefore, we were witness to secret meetings between the leaders of Israel and Saudi Arabia and certain other Persian Gulf states. It could also be said that the issue of the ‘deal of the century” aimed at ensuring the security of Israel and further expansion of political and economic interactions between conservative and authoritarian Arab regimes and the Zionist regime were among these measures.

Finally, one of the strategies followed after the failure of the Syria disintegration plan and the compulsory withdrawal of Americans from the crisis-prone areas in the Middle East with the aim to isolate Iran was the formation of a Hebrew-Arab NATO. Hence, Saudi Arabia has tried, in addition to its Persian Gulf allies, attract Egypt as one of the Middle East powers in a coalition called the Hebrew-Arab NATO against Iran, but with Cairo’s withdrawal from the coalition Saudi Arabia and its allies have faced an impasse in creating a full-fledged anti-Iran coalition.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading