Consequences of US Action Against IRGC, Contrary to International Law

Strategic Council Online: Putting the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) on the list of terrorist groups by the US and Iran’s designation of the US Central Command (CENTCOM) on the same list would increase the possibility of military confrontation between the two sides either intentionally or unintentionally. It can be said that it is now the most sensitive and the most dangerous juncture in the relationship between Iran and the United States which could lead to a military encounter. Amir Ali Abolfatah - American Affairs Expert

Ever since the administration of Donald Trump took over, the US approach to international rules, regulations, and customs has changed. This, of course, does not mean that former US governments always acted in the framework of international regulations, were participatory and maintained a constructive approach towards the international order. The difference between the government of Trump and previous US governments is that in his administration, such encounters have become much more apparent and occur without any cover-up and political and diplomatic considerations.

In this regard, mention can be made of the following cases among others: withdrawal from international treaties; unilateral decisions made by Washington over the issue of Palestine, such as transfer of the US embassy to Quds (Jerusalem) and recognition of the Zionist regime’s rule over the Golan Heights; banning the prosecutor of the International Criminal Court from entering the US soil; or adopting laws to prevent travel of Muslims to the US. In this context, the United States is expected to continue to pursue a more unilateralist approach towards Iran. In compliance with this policy, last year Washington pulled back from the Iran Nuclear Accord (also known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action) and now it has designated the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps as a terrorist group.

It is for the first time part of sovereignty or part of the armed forces of a country is placed on the list of US designation of terrorist groups. Although not approved by the international community, it is unlikely to receive support except for a few countries in the region. But even if the US is isolated, it would not be a matter of concern for Washington. It can even be said that the United States has adopted a policy of controversy, unilateralism, and ignoring the most obvious international rules, regulations and conventions. But as this approach is pursued as a dominant policy in Washington, it is not a matter of concern for US officials.

It should be noted that former governments, as they were reluctant to see the incumbent governments get isolated, sometimes tried to join the international community or strive to draw support from the international community. But the nationalists who have come to power in the United States since 2016, are not very concerned about the image of the United States and are basically critical of international processes and view these policies as a weak point; they may even be pleased and regard this as a strong point that their course of action is opposed by the world.

Nevertheless, the US designation of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps as a terrorist group will have consequences and implications, which can be reviewed at three levels: First bilateral relations between the United States and Iran; second at the regional level namely West Asia region, and third at the international level. At the bilateral level between the United States and the Islamic Republic of Iran, we can say that the current situation is the most stressful and chaotic days since the 1979 Iranian revolution.

Over the past 40 years, there have been many ups and downs in Tehran-Washington relations, but there has never been any serious conflict between the parties and the sides have not accused each other’s armed forces of being terrorists.

Putting the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) on the list of terrorist groups by the US and Iran’s designation of the US Central Command (CENTCOM) on the same list would increase the possibility of military confrontation between the two parties either intentionally or unintentionally. It can be said that it is now the most sensitive and the most dangerous time in the relationship between Iran and the United States and it could lead to a military encounter.
The regional-level implications also go back to the fact that increased military risk and possible collision between Iran and the United States would have some regional implications. Because US forces are dispersed in the West Asia region and Iran too, has an advisory presence in Iraq and Syria. Therefore, a military encounter can aggravate the turbulent state of the region and spread across the region.
At the international level, there is also the danger that the recent US decision would turn into a custom, and from now on, Americans will designate the armed forces of other countries as terrorists, and the rest of the world would take countermeasures.
Therefore, the tradition that has been practised over the past 200 years, where and the countries would not designate each other as terrorists would be eliminated and it would become a procedure that will increase the level of conflicts in the international arena. These international outcomes are also alarming and could have a fundamental transformation of the rules of war and international law related to armed hostilities.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading