Statement by Dr. Kamal Kharazi on the Motives Behind the European Union’s Support of the UAE’s Claim

Strategic Council Online: In a statement addressing the European Union's motives for supporting the United Arab Emirates (UAE) claim over the three Iranian islands, Dr. Kamal Kharazi, President of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, cautioned UAE authorities to abandon their hostility towards Iran's territorial integrity. He emphasized that they should return to dialogue instead of relying on external forces who support the UAE’s claim with economic motives. Such dialogue, based on historical facts and documented evidence, can lead to a peaceful resolution and foster stability in the region. Pursuing a path dictated by outsiders, however, will only lead to war and destruction.

The complete statement by Dr. Seyed Kamal Kharazi, published today, is as follows:

The European Union’s support for the UAE in its claim over the three islands represents clear hostility towards Iran under the pretense of Iran’s alleged support for Russia in the Ukraine war. Notably, neither the United States nor Europe has confirmed any transfer of ballistic missiles from Iran to Russia. Moreover, Iran has consistently opposed the occupation of Ukrainian territory and has called for a ceasefire, negotiations, and an end to the occupation.

EU’s adversarial stance, including sanctioning three Iranian airlines and their recent public statements, stems from Iran’s support for Palestinian resistance and Europe’s backing of the Israeli occupying regime, which continues to violate the rights and lives of Palestinians. Europe, through the provision of deadly weapons and financial aid, has empowered this brutal regime, and now, in a hypocritical move, seeks to target Iran’s territorial claims in retaliation for Iran’s position on Palestine.

The European Union’s position on the three islands lacks any legal standing. It is a politically motivated attempt to attract financial resources from wealthy Persian Gulf states, particularly the UAE, to offset the financial burden of their involvement in the Ukraine war. They are fully aware that when British colonialism ended its occupation of the region in 1971, including the three islands, those islands were returned to their rightful owner, Iran because all historical maps and documents affirmed that those islands belonged to Iran, and Britain had no choice but to recognize that. Of course, during this process, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi committed an unforgivable betrayal by agreeing to the separation of Bahrain from Iran, based on a fake referendum.,

The historical and legal evidence confirming Iran’s sovereignty over the three islands is so overwhelming that politically motivated statements aimed at securing financial support will not alter Iran’s firm stance. These islands are part of Iran, and the Iranian armed forces remain resolute in defending the country’s territorial integrity.

During my tenure as foreign minister, I initiated friendly negotiations with UAE officials to resolve the misunderstanding regarding Abu Musa Island and the presence of UAE nationals in its southern part. This was based on the 1971 agreement, which entrusted Iran with the security of the island, including the safety of Emirati nationals residing there. Unfortunately, these efforts were thwarted by the unfaithful behavior of the UAE authorities.

Today, based on my extensive political experience, I urge the younger generation of UAE leaders who, unlike their wise and experienced forefathers, are rushing to assert their claims through alliances with Iran’s adversaries, to set aside their hostility towards Iran’s territorial integrity. Instead of pursuing a path shaped by economic motives and external influences, they should return to dialogue. Only through a genuine commitment to historical facts and documented evidence can this dispute be resolved, promoting peace and stability in the region. Otherwise, the path they are being led down will only lead to war and destruction.

Seyyed Kamal Kharazi

President, Strategic Council on Foreign Relations

‏18‏

/10‏/2024

0 Comments

LATEST CONTENT

Implications of the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Myanmar’s Leader

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Myanmar’s military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, is facing charges of committing crimes against humanity for the killing and persecution of Rohingya Muslims. The crimes, which affected more than a million people in Myanmar, took place between August and December 2017. During this period, the Myanmar military launched an operation called “clearance” under the pretext of fighting armed groups that led to the genocide of Muslims in Rakhine State in western Myanmar. This operation was accompanied by the widespread killing of more than 200,000 Rohingya Muslims and the displacement of about 700,000 people. The International Criminal Court has identified these actions as examples of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Implications of the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Myanmar’s Leader

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Myanmar’s military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, is facing charges of committing crimes against humanity for the killing and persecution of Rohingya Muslims. The crimes, which affected more than a million people in Myanmar, took place between August and December 2017. During this period, the Myanmar military launched an operation called “clearance” under the pretext of fighting armed groups that led to the genocide of Muslims in Rakhine State in western Myanmar. This operation was accompanied by the widespread killing of more than 200,000 Rohingya Muslims and the displacement of about 700,000 people. The International Criminal Court has identified these actions as examples of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Ukrainian War and the Widening East-West Divide

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: A proxy war is when two countries fight each other indirectly by supporting the warring parties. Classic examples from the Cold War era include the Congo crisis in the 1960s and the Angola crisis in the 1970s when the Soviet Union and the United States supported each of the warring sides in a civil war with money, weapons, and sometimes soldiers, but never directly engaged in the war themselves. Accordingly, the approach of the United States and Europe, in the form of NATO and their all-out support for Ukraine, has all the hallmarks of a proxy war against Russia.

Turkey’s Policy Towards Trade Relations with the Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recently, the Turkish Minister of Commerce confirmed that Turkish customs have been completely closed to trade with the Zionist Regime. This news was met with many comments and questions, and one of the most important questions was why Turkey decided to take such a step, how serious it is in practice, and what will be its consequences on the relations between the parties.

Analysis: The Reasons for Accepting the Ceasefire in Lebanon

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Finally, after about two months of the Zionist regime’s war against Lebanon and in a situation where the war on the Lebanese front had intensified to an unprecedented extent in the days leading up to the ceasefire, the Zionist regime agreed to truce.

An Analysis on Trump’s Possible Foreign Policy Approach

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on American affairs said: Although, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the approach to the Chinese threat will be the first issue of American foreign policy, the American public will not support the government in a full-scale economic war with China.

Terrorist Attack in Syria; Scheme to Open a New Front Against the Resistance Axis

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues considered the terrorist attack on the city of Idlib at the beginning of the winter season a “surprise” move and said: “Basically, an attack at this time of the year is out of the question because fighters usually do not choose the cold and winter seasons for military operations. There is no other reason why and how they took military action and advanced towards the city of Idlib and then Aleppo in a surprising way except that it is related to regional issues and the Israeli regime’s war in Lebanon and Gaza.”

Analysis of the Roots and Prospects of the Conflict in Aleppo, Syria

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: After several years of calm and immediately after the ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, the Syrian city of Aleppo has become the scene of clashes between opposition and armed groups led by Tahrir al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra) and the Syrian army and government.

Iran-Saudi Balanced Approach to Reviving Relations

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The second round of the Iran-Saudi-China trilateral meeting, hosted by Riyadh, signals the development of relations in an atmosphere of increasing regional and international tensions and uncertainties. The meeting also confirmed China’s role beyond facilitating the revived relations between Tehran and Riyadh and related to China’s political economy perspective in the Middle East, which has significant implications for the Beijing-Washington macro-rivalry.

Loading