Strategic Consequences for NATO Membership of Sweden & Finland

2022/05/24 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: During the recent day, we witnessed that Sweden and Finland expressed their decision to join NATO. Traditionally, the two countries have followed the policy of non-membership in any alliance. Even during the Cold War, they adhered to their policy. The neutrality policy was also considered as an important factor to secure the stability of North Europe by Moscow, which had been admitted by European countries as well. Dr. Mohammad Medhi Mazaheri, University Professor

Now, with the new application by the two countries, however, NATO has called it as deepening cooperation with Finland and Sweden and expressed its satisfaction, but Russian authorities have publicly interpreted the measure as making enemy with Russia. In a situation as such, the question crossed into one’s mind that basically what is the reason for raising such an application by Sweden and Finland? And what will be the strategic consequences of their application to join NATO?

To reply the first question, it must be said that although international media try to introduce Russian invasion of Ukraine as the only source of concern to these two Northern European countries and their decision to join NATO, and indeed, it represents a part of real puzzle too; but it is not definitely the whole truth. If we see the stage of major powers’ strategic games from a rather broader perspective, then we will realize that after the change of the U.S. national security strategy within the recent years, and the country’s change of approach as well as its twist of attention  from the Middle East and the Persian Gulf to China and Russia, the effort to strengthen NATO and make Europe unified against Russia in order to weaken one of the two competitors, i.e. Russia, has been a top issue on the U.S. strategic programs.

Therefore, attention must be paid to the point that expression of willingness of the two Scandinavian countries to join NATO as members was not a merely an internal decision based on their security requirements but a decision that has been taken under the U.S. guidance and support. Signing a new contract by Finland to buy 64 F-35 fighters from the U.S. in February 2021 is a solid evidence to substantiate it. Based on this, if Sweden and Finland join NATO, the European Union will place itself against Russia more than ever, and a kind of overall pressure will be exerted on Russia as an agenda, and this is what the U.S. authorities are looking for; weakening Russia at the cost borne by its Alliances. Therefore, with NATO expansion and strengthening the military power of NATO’s European section, Europeans partnership to contain Russia will be increased and the U.S. can contain China with an upper hand.

To reply the second question; on the upcoming strategic consequences of joining Sweden and Finland to NATO. It must be said that this will lead to further expansion and strengthening of NATO, and thus tightening the siege of Russia, and consequently, security ambiance as well as tension levels will be boosted in the Northern Europe region for sure. Although Finland and Sweden do not have large population and big military budgets, but they enjoy having modern armies as well as optimized military industrial – technological infrastructure. However, due to their concerns about Russian threat, they have increased their military budget during the recent years. Finland increased its military budget from three to five billion dollar, and Sweden increased it from five to seven billion dollar after the outbreak of war in Ukraine. Therefore, the membership of the two countries will increase NATO power and its further comprehensive.

Russians have openly acknowledged the joining of Sweden and Finland to North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) as a serious danger to them. Thus, in case the two countries become NATO members, in not a far future, we will witness a military and political confrontation between Russia and the West. Based on this, deployment of missiles capable of carrying nuclear warhead along the Russian border with Finland and other European countries by Kremlin, invading other Micronesia European countries that have common borders with Russia, halting the export or making energy carriers expensive as a leverage against European countries and of course, Kremlin’s effort to align and probably setting up a counterpart military pact are among some mechanisms that Moscow may proceed with in reaction to the decision made by the two countries.

Therefore, NATO expansion with new members will not maintain security and stability for European countries, instead, it will make them confront with Russia and turn Europe into an instrument to cater the U.S. objectives and interests, distort the political and economic development of the Green Continent, and ultimately turn Eastern and Northern Europe regions to a new hotspot in the global geopolitical map.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading