US Concern over Missile Nuclear Strategy of North Korea, China Gaining Power

2022/05/24 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Interview: A university professor, saying that the US objective in proposing negotiations is not to change the North Korean regime or its weaponry, but to separate North Korea from China, added: Measures North Korea is taking with the display of weapons are to the extent of propaganda maneuvers and psychological warfare; because it has no confidence in China’s support in the event of war.

Speaking in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, Dr. Nozar Shafiei, referred to the verbal tensions between the United States and North Korea and the White House readiness to negotiate with Pyongyang and stated: Although under the current situation, the Ukraine crisis is a spark that its developments specifies international structure of the future, but more than the situation in Ukraine the future of Taiwan and North Korea is important. If something has happened in Ukraine, it is entirely related to the developments in the Asia-Pacific region.

Saying that the main conflict and polarization in the future is in the Asia-Pacific region and the area in which China and the United States are present, he added: In fact, it is the order of the Asia-Pacific region that ultimately directs the international order. Under such circumstances, given that the US behavior can be interpreted within the context of aggressive realism, it is trying to deprive China of anything that could lead to the strengthening of China.

The university professor noted: The ultimate objective of the United States in weakening Russia is to weaken China. In this regard, the countries that are strategically embraced by China should also get out of this situation. In this region, North Korea and Myanmar are the two important countries that the United States is trying to pull out of China’s strategic arms. Meanwhile, the situation in North Korea, which is known as the “Chinese Teeth”, is even more important.

 

US attempting to widen gap between North Korea, China

Shafiei continued: Despite the announcement of the North Korean leader’s commitment to strengthen his country’s nuclear capability, the US administration stressed that it is still ready to hold talks with Pyongyang. In fact, the United States is trying in various ways to persuade North Korea to increase its distance from China. By increasing this distance, North Korea’s nuclear weapons may not be even of much concern to the United States.

He said the US objective in proposing the talks was not to change the North Korean regime or its weapons, but to separate North Korea from China. Certainly in the coming years, countries such as North Korea, Myanmar and Taiwan will have a very high strategic value in the strategies of China and the United States and are considered as geopolitical axes, the domination of which will play a very important role in the victory of strategic powers over future developments.

The international affairs analyst pointed to North Korea’s latest military weapons display, including long-range missiles during the recent parade, as well as the US claims that satellite images show Pyongyang is preparing for a nuclear test and added: According to the US and South Korea, apparently North Korea is rebuilding a tunnel at a nuclear test site that was used for underground explosions before it was closed in 2018 amid nuclear disarmament talks with Washington and Seoul.

He said: The rise of those movements and missile nuclear strategies, is very worrying for the United States under the current circumstances, in which the US is preparing for a more serious confrontation with China. Meanwhile, the North Korean leader also stressed that he was committed to strengthen the nuclear forces of his country at the highest speed and threatened to use them if provoked.

Shafiei said North Korea had come to the conclusion that it can have no confidence in its allies and that it should be “self-help”, adding: However, China plays a key role in North Korea’s survival, and it is their shared borders that have saved it from sanctions pressure. Therefore, North Korea’s first policy is self-improvement and then strategic reliance on China.

Regarding North Korea’s approach to the US negotiation proposal, he noted: North Korea has a bitter experience of negotiating with the US, several rounds of negotiations have been held and agreements have been reached, but the US has violated those agreements. Therefore, North Korea cannot forget such a negative experience. It seems that North Korea will only enter into negotiations with the United States if it wants to take advantage of the existing international atmosphere from both China and the United States. Under such circumstances, they may send signals to the United States to start negotiations.

The university professor described the start of talks between the United States and North Korea as difficult given Pyongyang’s experiences and US objectives, and commenting on the possibility of escalation of Tensions between Washington and Pyongyang regarding the expansion of North Korean nuclear military activities, he said: North Korea alone is not a threat to the United States, although it is a threat to Japan and South Korea.

 

China’s attempt to contain North Korea

Shafiei described the alliance between South Korea, Japan and the United States as having worrying consequences for North Korea, saying: Measures that North Korea is taking is to the extent of propaganda maneuvers and psychological warfare; because it has no confidence in China’s support for itself in the event of war. Although China knows it will eventually line up with the United States, it does not tend to have its environment become security-dominated. For them, it is not yet time to enter the conflict, and any turmoil and insecurity in the regional environment will delay China’s growth and progress.

He stressed: Under such situation, China will try to contain North Korea and will not allow a conflict to break out. Developments may go up to the brink of conflict, but they will not involve in full-scale military confrontation. This is the Achilles heel for China, which has increased US maneuvering power in the region. In fact, China is more inclined to respond to some threats through North Korea, and some North Korean positions are taken in consultation with China.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading