Consequences of Zionist Regime’s Heavy Defeat in Africa

2022/02/20 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Opinion: Refusing to accept the Zionist regime in the African Union was not only considered as a new and humiliating defeat for the regime, but would have a very negative impact on another set of efforts to legitimize Israel. Jafar Qanadbashi - Expert on Africa affairs

Despite the Zionist regime’s intense and comprehensive attempts to gain the observer status at the African Union, the African governments unanimously refused to accept the membership and rejected what the African Union Commission (AUC) had previously accepted in an unconsidered move without taking views of its member states into consideration.

Various factors worked together, and the Zionist regime which tried to call the entry into the African Union as a great success after the scandalous defeat of the controversial “Deal of the Century”, faced an unexpected event; especially that in such area, it was the African nations who, through their indirect influence, imposed such a humiliating defeat on the Zionist regime.

Although Algeria and 11 other countries were named as the main factors in this regard, it was the public opinion of the African nations that played a role in realizing the consensus on the rejection of the Zionist membership.

The predominantly black nations of South Africa consider the Zionist regime as the apartheid regime in South Africa; because this regime, based on Zionist attitudes, describes the Palestinian people as a lower race and Bani-Israel (sons of Israel) as a superior race.

For this reason, they have repeatedly called on the Zionist regime to end its racist and sectarian policies in Palestine, like South Africa, but the predominantly Muslim nations of North Africa emphasize the need to support the Palestinian brothers and sisters from an Islamic perspective and consider what is being done against the Palestinians in occupied Palestine as a double injustice to their brothers and sisters.

However, all African nations, based on their past colonial experiences in Africa, consider any occupation of the territory as an unforgivable act and place the Zionist regime in the lowest position in this regard.

Thus, it can be said that what the African governments voted for at the African Union meeting is in fact the result of popular tendencies in African public opinion, which those governments, under different titles, are obliged to observe.

However, the Zionist regime pursued various and very important targets in its attempts to become an observer member in the African Union, the first and most important of which was the attempt to exit from isolation and establish its position as a legitimate political system, just as the Zionist regime has attempted in recent years, to normalize relations with some Arab countries, in order to pretend that not only the Palestinian issue has been ended, but that the Zionist regime has been accepted as a reality by all governments.

On the other hand, this project of normalizing relations with two Arab countries that are also African, namely Sudan and Morocco, has faced widespread popular opposition and requires a series of other propaganda efforts so that it could be considered as a normal affair. As a result, the Zionist regime’s objective of trying to join the African Union went far beyond stabilizing its position and making the necessary effort to complete the project of normalizing relations with Morocco and Sudan; in other words, as the Zionist regime’s membership in the African Union was accepted by the governments, the governments of Morocco and Sudan had typically lesser problems with their nations in this regard.

Another objective of Tel Aviv is to obtain a license to enter the economy field, especially mining area, in the countries that have the most diamonds and gold in the world, as well as precious metals and, as usual, Israelis and the Tel Aviv government are constantly trying to monopolize the total exchanges related to this type of metals by creating a mafia for the exchange of diamond, gold, and more recently, titanium.

Of course, the target of the Zionist regime in the field of Africa include other cases as well; because they sought to establish their spy and intelligence activities in the Islamic societies of the northern part of the continent by obtaining a license through membership in the African Union. In fact, the Israelis wanted their activities in those countries not to be brought under the magnifying glass by gaining the observer position in the Union. However, with the suspension and non-acceptance of such membership in the African Union, such goals have become more unattainable.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading