U.S. Instrumental Use of Human Rights to Exert Pressure on China

2022/01/10 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Further to Tiananmen Square incidents in 1989 and afterwards, criticism against Beijing’s attitudes in Xinjiang, Tibet, Hong Kong and other regions in China have been among the U.S. pivots of exerting pressure against China. As tensions increased in other fields during the recent years, the U.S. having resorted to human rights issues, attempted to mount pressures against China. Mohammad Javad Ghahremani, Expert on Asia Affairs

Although the issue was one of the pillars of Asia – based strategy of Barak Obama in the field of human rights and boosting democracy in Asia – Pacific, but the issue was dealt with less importance during the presidency of Donald Trump. Yet, as Biden took office in the U.S., human rights issues have turned to become one of the U.S. priorities against China.

If one looks at the list of Biden Administration measures during the last month, the U.S. severity on this issue will be clearly revealed. For example, on December 10, 2021 coincided with World Day of Human Rights, the U.S. imposed extensive sanctions relevant to human rights upon tens of persons and foundations in China, Myanmar, North Korea and Bangladesh. It also added the Chinese artificial intelligence company of Sense Time to the black list of investment. A week after, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced that a number of Chinese technological companies have been added in the black list and prevent them doing business or trade with the U.S. The peak of the confrontation attitude of Biden Administration is the signing of the bill to ban the importation of goods from China’s Xinjiang. The measure made the U.S as the first country that almost completely bans all imports from the region.

Prior to this, in July 2021 the U.S. Department of State in a statement accused the Chines government for its extensive abuse in Xinjiang and other regions of the country. On July 13, 2021 Biden Administration added 14 companies to its economic black list and in March 2021, imposed sanctions upon two Chinese authorities for their role in grave human rights violations against the ethnic minorities in Xinjiang. One of the reasons of the White House for banning Winter Olympic games in China was their reference to genocide and crimes against humanity in Xinjiang and other cases of human rights violation.

These cases indicate that value-behavior field has turned to become one of the serious confronting pivots between the two countries. Having employed these pressures, the U.S. depicts a negative image of China and attempts to make a duality and thus makes costly the accompaniment of other countries with China. In the meantime, Washington tries to shed light onto the confrontation of the political systems of the two countries. Its embodiment was obvious in Summit for Democracy Meeting which was held during 9-10 December 2021. This aspect of competition has shown itself more than ever in the past in the relations between the two countries during the recent years and after the outbreak of Coronavirus. China tried to attribute its success to combat with Coronavirus pandemic to its efficient political system. This very issue causes the U.S. to try to question the method of governance in China more than ever in the past too.

The White House is making effort to mobilize the company of the like-minded countries in line with the stabilization of the duality. For example, Britain and also Canada accompanied the U.S. in human rights sanction against Myanmar which shows coordination with like-minded countries to confront China is not limited to merely economic and military alliance-making but also contains soft fields. In line with this, the remarks of Wally Adeymo, the U.S. Under-Secretary of Treasury is remarkable who was saying as:” the U.S. measures, particularly those in coordination with Britain and Canada send the message that democracies throughout the world will take measure against those who misuse the state authority for imposition of sufferings and suppression.

This approach can also bring objective achievements for the U.S. For example, within the context of human rights concerns in Xinjiang, and having limited the cooperation with Chinese technological corporations, and coincided with competition of the two countries in technological field, the U.S. puts them under pressure.

In view of one of the policies of Beijing in Xinjiang which is making effort for its economic development, as the result of banning import from this region, the policy of balanced development of China will face difficulties. In the meantime, despite China’s opposition, Taiwan was also invited to attend in the Summit for Democracy Meeting which can be assessed as de-legitimizing Beijing policies.

In general, having exerted human rights pressures by the U.S. against China along with other aspects of the relations between the two countries, like military-security and economic fields, it will be revealed that the relations of the two countries have entered into new stage which the competition is its obvious and clear characteristics, although, it is anticipated that both sides have competition management in their agenda in order to avoid miscalculation and mounting tensions in an unmanageable way.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading