Iron Wall Policy & Human Rights Claims in Europe?!

2021/11/20 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Opinion: A new wave of migration has been formed in the eastern borders of the European Union once again in recent days. Immigrants from predominantly crisis-hit countries such as Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria are trying to reach the EU member states, but what seems different this time from other cases is Europe’s finger of accusation which is pointed at Belarus. Hossein Sayyahi - Researcher on international affairs

Belarus has been the target of sanctions and pressure since the August 2020 elections. Brussels believes that this wave of migration is not led by human traffickers, but by the Belarusian government. In this regard, the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, has stated that Europe will not succumb to the pressure and blackmail of Belarus; measures that, in Brussels’ point of view, are a kind of blackmailing behavior by which Lukashenko will seek political and instrumental use of asylum seekers. Lukashenko, on the other hand, has stated that Belarus will never become a haven for the immigrants.

What is evident, however, is a repetition of the game of power that is taking place through the use of asylum seekers and crises stemming from their migration, with the exception that this time it is assumed that the crisis will neither be solved through a deal and financial assistance but through the iron wall.

In 2015, former US President Donald Trump during his election campaigns unveiled his decision to build a border wall between the United States and Mexico to prevent the entry of illegal immigrants. The decision which boosted his popularity among Republicans and Conservatives, as well as Americans opposed to migration.

Trump’s tumultuous anti-immigration wall project kicked off after his election, and of course was accompanied by many ups and downs: A wall the budget for which has now been ordered frozen with the Biden administration taking over; but American Democrats and leftists were not the only critics of the border wall; Many EU member states also criticized Trump’s policy and decision.

However, it seems that due to the recent immigration crisis in Europe, European critics of the border wall with Mexico will also gradually seek to build border walls in Europe under different pretext of nationalism and anti-immigration public opinion.

Thus, in the face of a wave of asylum seekers moving from Belarus to the borders of Poland and Lithuania, Lithuania has announced that it will build a 500km long steel wall with a height of 3.4 meters at its border. The Polish Interior Minister also announced that the construction of a 180-kilometer wall with a height of 5.5 meters is under consideration. A decision that has brought effects of anti-immigration measures and policies back into the spotlight.

In the recent crisis, many countries have been influential and each has its own orientation; orientations that were based on national interests and it seem that moral values, human rights concepts, and the lasting solution of the refugee crisis have played the most dramatic role and have the least impact on those decisions.

In the meantime, Belarus has taken a kind of revenge against the European Union and in this way it considers encouraging asylum seekers to move to Poland and Lithuania as a lever of pressure in confronting with Brussels.

Poland, on the other hand, under the leadership of the right-wing Law and Justice Party, seized the opportunity to use the crisis not only to regain its declining popularity, but also to strengthen its political position by gaining the support of Polish society opposed to immigration. In addition, by building such a wall, Poland could present itself as the front line of the EU’s eastern crisis and try to use it as a bargaining tool in its disputes with Brussels (such as disputes over legal reform at the national level as well as reducing use of coal).

The use of the iron wall policy has also been somewhat successful in gaining the support of EU members, as the German Interior Minister Horst Seehofer believes that Europe should stand together and help Poland. The President of the European Council, Charles Michel, has also stated that Europe can legally finance border barriers.

Although such statements are not very popular among moderate and left-leaning European parties, many right-wing parties, such as the European People’s Party, as well as currents and nationalist parties, support such anti-immigration programs.

Turkey is another country where asylum seekers go to Belarus. Although the country’s aviation authority has stated that citizens of Iraq, Syria and Yemen will not be allowed to travel to Belarus from Turkey, it also has a long history of using asylum seekers as a political tool.

This country is also seeking to complete a border wall with Iran, which its officials say many immigrants cross illegally; a decision that is not an effective solution, but can be considered as a political show-off and tranquilizer to reduce the pressure and confront the growing opposition of the domestic opposition, especially the Republican Party and its leader Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu, and public opinion to the Erdoğan’s immigration policies.

Numerous and obvious factors are considered as reasons for migration, of which war, poverty, insecurity and political instability are the most important ones. In contrast, economic problems, sometimes security, as well as social tensions due to non-integration and proper adaptation of the refugees to the destination community has strengthened anti-immigrant public opinion in Western countries.

For example, in Hungary Orbal owes much of his success in remaining as prime minister to calling Muslim immigrants aggressive and committing to preventing them from entering the country. Today, the current of nationalism and adoption of anti-immigration policies such as establishment of iron wall, etc., can be the key to the success of populist and far-right candidates in the elections.

Federica Mogherini, a former EU foreign policy chief, believes that European tradition and history have shown that bridges should be built and that anyone who invests in walls may be imprisoned, while in the quasi-nationalist West today, victory seems to be of those who invest in the walls and the defeat will be due to human rights, cosmopolitanism, and the unfulfilled slogans of normative and idealistic approaches. Approaches that do not work as effectively in the face of the nation-state and the still stable borders of the Westphalian order. It should be noted that although in the Power Struggle construction of walls, like the Berlin Wall during the Cold War, is considered part of the solution, this time those iron walls are not a barrier to the influence of the Soviet Empire, but to the refugees who have heard the elegy of the destruction of their homeland and the song of Western human rights.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading