Pakistan’s Strategy towards Afghanistan

2021/08/21 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - The former head of Afghanistan Support Headquarters at the IRI Ministry of Foreign Affairs, stating that Pakistan considers Afghanistan the depth of its strategy, said: It is better for countries in the region to allow the Afghan people to independently determine their government and address common concerns through friendly relations.

Mohsen Rouhi Sefat, speaking in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, referred to the historical problems between Afghanistan and Pakistan and the long-standing problem regarding the Durand Line between the two countries, which has existed since the establishment of Pakistan, and added: This is the main problem in the relations between the two countries, which overshadows other issues. Pakistan suffers from the fact that the Afghan government has not recognized its borders in the past 100 years and there are claims over part of its territory.

He noted that Pakistan has a serious border dispute with two of its three neighbors and its borders are unclear, adding that Pakistan is at war with India and has no official border with the country. Over time, India has consistently become stronger than Pakistan, and Pakistan has no hope of overcoming it.

The former Iranian diplomat, saying that Pakistan feels that it can upset the balance of power in its favor in the face of Afghanistan, which is weaker than itself, further remarked:  With the events that have taken place in Afghanistan over the past 40 years, this has further paved the way for Pakistan; while prior to the month of Ordibehesht 1358 (April/May 1979), Pakistan did not dare to invade the country because Afghanistan had been in the Eastern Camp for some time.

Political characteristics of desirable Pakistani government in Afghanistan

Rouhi Sefat, saying that the Pakistani government is politically interested in the Kabul government not having a good relationship with India as the enemy of Islamabad, added: Pakistan is interested in the presence of a government in Kabul that will be allied with it against India. Pakistan, meanwhile, sees Afghanistan as the depth of its strategy and is interested in that Kabul government use Pakistan’s territory as a transit route, and that life and death of Afghanistan which takes shape through trade be formed through the port of Karachi.

He continued: Pakistan does not seek a strong government in Afghanistan; because in that case it cannot get its demands from the Kabul government. In addition, it has no interest in establishment of a nationalist government in Afghanistan; this is because nationalist sentiments in Afghanistan may be reinforced over their claims to Pakistani territory in Pashtunistan. In fact, Pakistan wants those in power in Kabul be aligned religious forces; because with religious unity, it can overshadow national and border issues.

According to the expert on international affairs; Pakistan can work with the Taliban better than the nationalist bureaucrat and even Pashtun; in addition, the country is not interested in the forming of a civil society in Afghanistan; because civic groups in Afghanistan have anti-Pakistani sentiments due to historical issues.

Stressing that water is a vital issue for Pakistan, he said: 30 percent of Pakistan’s water comes from Afghanistan, and Afghanistan has completed two major dams over the past few years that flow into Iran. The country has also prepared a plan to control the water flowing to Pakistan and is seeking to build a dam on the rivers flowing to Pakistan. Pakistan is very dissatisfied about this issue and one of its demands of Afghanistan is not to build those dams. In fact, Pakistan has border and water concerns with regard to Afghanistan.

Rouhi Sefat described lack of a strong and cohesive army in Afghanistan as desirable for Pakistan and explained: Islamabad tends to train Afghan security and military forces in Pakistan and considers restrictions on the number of Afghan troops and forces. Pakistan is also interested in having proxy extremist forces in Afghanistan to be used against India, just as Afghan forces served in the Pakistani army in operations against India 20 years ago.

Pakistan’s desirable economic prospects in Afghanistan

He considered security of the energy transit line important for Islamabad so that Turkmenistan energy can be transferred through Afghanistan to Pakistan or India, adding: Islamabad has not invested much in Afghanistan and no infrastructural investment has been witnessed by Pakistan in Afghanistan over the past 20 years. It has not even fulfilled its obligations; because it is interested in Afghanistan being more economically dependent on Pakistan.

The former diplomat said that Pakistan expects the ethnic government, which now appears with the presence of the Taliban, to rule over the entire territory of Afghanistan, adding: However, Pakistan’s declared policy is different and states that it is interested in peace in Afghanistan.

Reminding that when Mullah Omar’s death was announced, it turned out that he died two years ago, he specified: In those two years, verdicts were issued and the Taliban were administered. No one answered this question that who was running the Taliban during those two years! It is clear that there was another apparatus and force that ruled the Taliban during those two years until Mullah Omar’s successor was identified.

The international affairs analyst continued: In Pakistan, there are various factions and institutions that are active on the issue of Afghanistan, the government has a moderate official position towards Afghanistan and the other part is the army, which is the main decision-maker in this regard. Another part is the hard line Pakistani military intelligence retirees who are implementing the policies of Pakistan regarding Afghanistan and the Taliban and have an active presence in the field and on the scenes.

He pointed to the widespread presence of Pakistani citizens among the Taliban, and called such presence as arbitrary by Islamabad and said: Although it is said that the Taliban have control over 80 percent or half of Afghanistan, their leaders never claim to be in Afghanistan and their headquartered is outside the country; this is a serious question.

Illegitimacy and lack of official recognition; regional and global problem of the Taliban

Referring to the published news about Pakistan’s efforts to invite different groups in Afghanistan with an aim of holding talks between them and also a meeting of Afghanistan’s neighboring countries, Rouhi Sefat said: The main problem that emerged out of the Taliban attack 20 years ago was that although they controlled 90% of Afghanistan’s territory, they were not identified. Only three countries, of Pakistan, the UAE and Saudi Arabia, officially recognized the Taliban government. This was an important factor in the failure of the policies of Pakistan and the Taliban government.

The analyst of international affairs stressed: They have learned from history, and we see that the tone of the Taliban and Pakistan is softer than it was 20 years ago; although there are no differences in practice, they operate differently in speech. Preparations are underway by the Pakistani government to ensure that this recognition takes place at the regional and global levels, and efforts to hold those meetings can be assessed in this regard.

Signals of Doha agreement to the Taliban to gain legitimacy

Rouhi Sefat referred to the US-Taliban agreement not to seize provincial capitals and added: In this agreement, it was said that negotiations should take place between the Kabul government and the political factions with the Taliban and the US government should support its outcome even if those talks lead to the rule of the Taliban!

He described the Taliban’s attack on provincial capitals in line with putting pressure on the US administration to impose their demands and continued: The Taliban appear to be advancing up to the siege of Kabul, where they would call for negotiations and deliver power from the current government in a form to be accompanied with official recognition and international legitimacy.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading