Pakistan’s View on Withdrawal of US Troops from Afghanistan

2021/05/09 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - An analyst of Asia affairs said that the recent decision of the new US administration to withdraw its troops from Afghanistan is a win-win situation for Islamabad, adding that Pakistan views this issue politically and strategically against India and seeks to regain its strategic depth with an economic approach to Afghan markets as well as improving its relations with the United States.

Speaking in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, Behrouz Ayaz said that the US decision to withdraw 2,500 troops from Afghanistan on May 1 and finally on September 11 this year, marks the end of the 20-year US war in Afghanistan and the longest war in the history of the country and noted: This has wide political and economic implications for Pakistan; because this country considers Afghanistan its backyard and has always tried to infiltrate it.

He referred to efforts to form the Taliban in the 1990s and encouraging the group to negotiate peace now (as of December 2018) as one of Pakistan’s measures to infiltrate Afghanistan and added: Therefore, the US withdrawal from Afghanistan will be a turning point for Pakistan and the United States is aware that the conditions for its post-withdrawal period depend on Pakistan.

Ayaz, saying that Pakistan sees the current situation in the region in its interests, added that the country, which in recent years has replaced its geo-economic strategy with a geo-strategic, intends to use the current situation to strengthen its current strategy.

US withdrawal from Afghanistan, a win-win for Islamabad

He explained: This strategy means emphasizing economic and trade exchanges and represents a new look at the issues and developments in the South Asian region. In this regard, the recent decision of the new US administration to withdraw its troops from Afghanistan, the same demand that the Taliban is negotiating, is a win-win situation for Islamabad.

The expert on Asia affairs continued: On the one hand, the US withdrawal from Afghanistan will reduce India’s presence and influence in that country, and Pakistan sees this as an opportunity to increase its influence in Afghanistan, which is also of great importance in the political arena by strengthening and supporting the Taliban in order to turn Afghanistan into its strategic depth and in the field of economy and export of its goods to that country; because Afghanistan is one of the largest markets for Pakistani goods.

Ayaz stressed: On the other hand, Islamabad wants to use the relationship with the United States for its geo-economic strategy; because it knows very well that with this move, in addition to solving its problems with that country, can take steps for economic development and growth and overcome its internal problems; that is to say, the same behavior that India has chosen in its foreign policy; therefore, it is clear that Islamabad is assessing the military withdrawal of Washington and NATO from Afghanistan with a political and strategic view before India and the recovery of its strategic depth, with an economic approach to Afghan markets, as well as improving its relations with the United States.

Possibility of Taliban’s domination over most parts of Afghanistan

He also said that one of the most likely predictions and concerns of the US decision is the Taliban, Pakistan’s further support for Taliban, and return to 1990s for Afghanistan, adding that this could lead to Taliban’s domination over most parts of that country.

Ayaz continued: The importance of this issue is as such to know that the Taliban has made a lot of progress these days and has become stronger than the Taliban in previous years. It dominates 76 states and has influence over other states and considers itself the winner of the 20-year war with the United States.

The expert on Asia affairs noted: All of this is while confronting the group is not at the heart of the US policy at the moment, because the United States has changed its definition of “threat” and terrorist groups are no longer a threat to that country, rather countries like China and Russia are more relevant in this regard.

US failure to establish structural democracy in Afghanistan

Ayaz added: Although Islamabad has stated that it wants extensive relations with its neighbors and seeks to achieve a peaceful outcome in Afghanistan and de-escalate tensions with India; but it is possible that the US withdrawal from the region will have negative political and security consequences for the Kabul government and pave the way for the Taliban’s violent expansionist ambitions; because, after all, the United States has failed to build the structural democracy, overall security, and nation-state building project it claimed in Afghanistan.

Taliban strive for military victories

He added: Attracting Taliban forces in the Kabul government and the group’s efforts to gain political power is a more idealistic view of this issue. What is likely to be predicted is that the Taliban will give the green light to Islamabad to seek more military victories and conquests.

According to the expert on Asia affairs; given the dependence of Afghanistan’s security and military forces on the US forces and NATO, their remarkable effectiveness cannot be seen after the withdrawal of foreign troops, and the Taliban are expected to continue their large-scale attacks and insecurity in Afghanistan, more than ever, becomes a prey of the Taliban totalitarianism and pave the way for similar internal conflicts of the 1990s.

Ayaz, referring to Pakistan’s concerns over the withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan, commented on some analyzes of the possibility of establishing a base in Pakistan for the US, said: Pakistan wants broad relations with the United States, relations that are beyond strategic concerns and beyond suspicion about peace in Afghanistan.

Referring to Pakistan’s recent remarks on Islamabad’s desire for broader relations with the United States, despite Pakistan’s 60 billion dollars economic corridor with China, he continued: Those remarks show Islamabad’s desire for deep economic and political ties with the United States and a green light to the Biden’s administration which, of course, has not yet received a positive response from the other side.

Possibility of US refusal to establish close relations with Islamabad

Ayaz said: Although it is possible that relations between Pakistan and the United States will improve, given the new Cold War between Beijing and Washington on the one hand and the strategic relations between Beijing and Islamabad on the other hand, not only there is not a high possibility for Pakistan becoming a safe political base, rather, given that administrations in power in the United States look at Islamabad through the lens of Afghanistan, it can be said that the relationship between Islamabad and Washington largely depends on the foreign behavior of Pakistan and Afghanistan.

He stressed: There is a high probability that aftershocks and the post-US withdrawal from Afghanistan will bring more insecurity and instability to that country, and it is expected that the United States will refrain from establishing close relations with Islamabad, which will also be rooted in the US distrust of Pakistan, closer ties with India and Pakistan’s cooperation with the Taliban.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

An Analysis of the Recent Elections in Turkey

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Turkey’s March 31 local elections, which ended with the opposition’s victory and Erdogan’s party’s defeat, is considered an important “decisive point” in the future of Turkey’s domestic and foreign policy developments.
It determines the fate of several important political issues, in addition to the election of mayors and local managers for the next five years.
Hamid Khosayand – expert on regional issues

The strategy of the Israeli regime to get rid of the defeat in Gaza

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: It has been about six months since the Israeli regime attacked the Gaza Strip in October 2023. In the initial weeks and months of the attack, many analysts believed that the Israeli regime, based on its usual practice in wars after the Palestinian intifada, would agree to a truce and end the war after inflicting multiple casualties and damages.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University professor

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

An Analysis of the Recent Elections in Turkey

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Turkey’s March 31 local elections, which ended with the opposition’s victory and Erdogan’s party’s defeat, is considered an important “decisive point” in the future of Turkey’s domestic and foreign policy developments.
It determines the fate of several important political issues, in addition to the election of mayors and local managers for the next five years.
Hamid Khosayand – expert on regional issues

The strategy of the Israeli regime to get rid of the defeat in Gaza

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: It has been about six months since the Israeli regime attacked the Gaza Strip in October 2023. In the initial weeks and months of the attack, many analysts believed that the Israeli regime, based on its usual practice in wars after the Palestinian intifada, would agree to a truce and end the war after inflicting multiple casualties and damages.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University professor

Loading