Prospects of the peace process in Afghanistan and the Istanbul talks

2021/04/15 | interview, political, top news

Online Strategic Council—Interview: An analyst of Afghanistan issues says the Istanbul meeting is in fact complementary to the Moscow conference and it seems there is an agreement between the Americans and the Russians behind the curtains on the future of Afghanistan and the structure of power, adding that such efforts are far from success without soliciting the prior agreement of the neighbors and the incorporation of their viewpoints.

Pirmohammad Mollazehi told the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations that there appears to be a determination among big powers such as Russia, China, the United States and Europe with the objective of finding a political solution for the termination of the war in Afghanistan.

“The domestic situation in Afghanistan requires the formation of such a process. Moreover, the countries of the region and Afghanistan’s neighbors have also reached the conclusion that more serious efforts are needed in this path,” he said, referring to numerous rounds of negotiations held for the establishment of peace in Afghanistan.

Mollazehi said Russians and Americans have proposed two initiatives to establish peace in Afghanistan, adding that “under such circumstances, there is going to be a meeting within the next few days in Istanbul with the participation of all parties. This meeting is in fact complementary to the Moscow meeting and it appears that there is some sort of agreement behind the scene between the Americans and Russians over the future of Afghanistan and the structure of power—a structure of power which is going to be different from the arrangements formed by the United Nations and the first Bonn Conference which led to the establishment of the present structure of governance.”

New structures of power in Afghanistan

This expert of Afghanistan issues said “it seems that there is going to be a merger among opposition forces, the Taliban and the incumbent government as well as forces who claim power in Afghanistan in the new structure of power so that power is shared and Afghanistan’s Constitution is reformed or amended to be adaptable to the new conditions.”

According to Mollazehi, the form of government may change from the present status which has centralized power in Kabul and in the hands of the president. A parliamentary system shall be established with the prime minister to hold the executive power. Also, there is some sort of the distribution of power in the form of federalism which incorporates at least four main ethnicities of Afghanistan in areas that are legally under their control. A share of local government will be set aside for the federal government.

He said that the implementation of such a structure of power and program and the establishment of peace and stability through this structure will not be simple, adding that in addition to the Taliban who are claiming power, there are about 23 other groups that have had no place in these negotiations. They can easily hoist the flag of Daesh and continue their conflict under the name of the Daesh khalifate.

Mollazehi added that “it seems that there has been agreements on several issues. For example, they want Afghanistan to be non-partisan. In fact, a form of government which existed during Zaher Shah based on which no eastern and western powers shall interfere. This system of course was disrupted after a coup by Davood Khan. The conditions created after the victory of jihad and defeat of Russians which led to the emergence of the Mojahedin will not repeat under which Americans and Russians withdrew but countries of the region entered competition.”

Efforts to the impartiality of Afghanistan

This expert of Afghanistan affairs said an agreement should be hence concluded which is recognized by big powers and regional powers and neighbors as being impartial.

“If this happens, Afghanistan will be placed in a new status so that it could maintain its impartiality and if Afghanistan is to receive assistance from abroad, it should be unconditional and without foreign intervention.”

Referring to issues to be discussed in the Istanbul meeting, he said it seems that Afghanistan would move towards peace and stability and political solution if the dimensions of the new situation are well discussed and clarified in the Istanbul meeting. Otherwise, civil war may be intensified in Afghanistan after the Istanbul meeting.

On the criticisms leveled by the government of Ashraf Ghani concerning the probability of exerting power in changes in the structure of power and government, he said there are two branches of approaches in the government.

“In a branch which is known as the national unity government, there are Jihadis and the Northis represented by Mr. Abdollah Abdollah and the other branch is the Liberal Democrats who are represented by Mr. Ghani. The combination of these two currents would form the present government. It seems that the Northis and the Abdollah Abdollah section are prepared to reconcile with the Taliban.”

The probability of omission of Ashraf Ghani and his close allies from power

Mollazehi said Ashraf Ghani and his close allies will be sacrificed and probably omitted. However, the Liberal Democrat current will not be omitted. They are the third current that would remain next to the Jihadis, Abdollah and the Taliban. Therefore, the combination of these three currents would be probably taking the power in Afghanistan of course without the presence of Ashraf Ghani who may step aside.

This expert of Afghanistan issues said Ashraf Ghani is very political and would not step aside easily, adding that “Ghani will play his role as he brings a plan to Istanbul based on which early elections should be held within the next six months and the winner will hold the power and the process will be recognized and continue through democratic mechanisms described in the present Constitution of Afghanistan.

He said Ghani has presented this plan in order to maintain his grip on power.

“Within the framework of the present Constitution of Afghanistan, the Taliban would not easily accept this plan; therefore, each one of these players, either domestically or regionally and internationally, would be pursuing their own agenda in Istanbul however it seems that Mr. Abdollah Abdollah and the Taliban will not back down and Ashraf Ghani would therefore have no choice but the withdraw his plan.”

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading