US Arms Strategy in West Asia

2021/02/02 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - The US methods and incentives to sell arms to West Asia are more in line with building business for defense contractors than building security in West Asia. Mahmoud Fazeli – Expert on international affairs

The US State Department on December 29, 2020, approved arms sales agreements with Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Egypt. In early December, the Democrat senators failed to block the sale of F-35s aircraft as well as armed drones to the UAE. A few weeks before Trump’s withdrawal from the White House, his administration had agreed to sell arms to several countries in the West Asian region. At least five arms deals were approved by the US Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA), including bombs and related equipment worth 236 billion euros for Saudi Arabia, Apache helicopters worth 3 billion 300 million euros for Kuwait, and anti-missile equipment worth 84 million euros for Egypt, as well as aircraft targeting equipment worth 53 million euros for that country.

As alleged by the United States, those sales are “partnership to improve the security of friendly countries”, which is an important force for political stability and economic growth in the West Asian region. Arms sales were criticized in the US Congress and civil society. William Hartung, Director of the Arms and Security Program at the Center for International Policy (CIP), said “Saudi access to tens of thousands of precision-guided munitions thus far has not diminished the civilian toll in Yemen,  so Pentagon claims that more accurate bombs will reduce civilian casualties don’t hold up to scrutiny.” The same is true of arms sales to Egypt, which has been involved in a series of (so-called) anti-terrorist operations in the Sinai region but has been “violent and ineffective.”

In early December 2020, despite unsuccessful opposition of Democrat senators to block the sale of F-35s aircraft to the UAE, Trump finalized the deal at the end of November. Under the agreement, 50 state-of-the-art F-35 stealth aircraft and 18 MQ-type drones worth 18 billion euros will be sold to the UAE.

Riyadh spent about 70 billion dollars on buying weapons due to the war in Yemen, which is about 9% of the country’s GDP. Since Saudi Arabia invaded Yemen in 2015, it has become the world’s largest importer of weapons. The United States is the largest exporter of weapons to Saudi Arabia, so that from 2014 to 2018 it controlled about 70% of the Saudi arms market. The State Department agreed to sell 3,000 precision-guided munition (PGMs) bombs under a 290 billion dollar deal. The arms deal includes 3,000 GBU-39 (SDB I) bombs, carrier containers, support equipment, spare parts and technical support. Newly elected President Joe Biden vowed ahead of elections to suspend arms sales to Saudi Arabia, one of Washington’s largest customers in West Asia, to put pressure on Riyadh with an aim of ending the Yemeni war as one of the worst humanitarian crises in the world.

These sales, which are being touted by the United States as a key strategy against Iran, have been pursued by the US following the normalization of relations between the UAE and Israel. The Emiratis have long wanted to buy those types of advanced weapons, but Israel opposed the idea because of its superior military technology.

According to statistics released by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) in 2019, the US military industry held control of 61% of the world’s largest arms dealers. Statistics released by the institute show that a total of 12 American companies are among the 25 largest arms manufacturers in the world.

According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, arms exports to West Asia have increased by 87% in the past five years and at present account for more than a third of the global arms trade. From 2014 to 2018, Saudi Arabia imported more weapons than any other country in the world, and the purchase of Saudi weapons during this period increased by 192 percent compared to 5 years ago. The United States is the world’s largest arms seller, accounting for more than half of its arms exports to West Asia between 2014 and 2018, with Saudi Arabia importing 22 percent of US military exports.

Trump’s foreign policy in West Asia has pursued three targets: to improve relations with America’s traditional allies, including Israel, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt. The nuclear deal with Iran should be canceled in order to curb Tehran’s policy in the region and at the same time conclude a better nuclear deal with it and make progress in the Israeli-Palestinian peace talks. US relations with allied leaders improved during his four-year term, but this was detrimental to US interests in the long run. Trump canceled the nuclear deal with Iran and imposed tough sanctions on Tehran, but in principle the result was the exact opposite of the two targets mentioned above. Admittedly, what many governments in the United States failed to do, Trump did, that is, normalization of relations of some Arab regimes with the Zionist regime. This happened today with the UAE, Bahrain, Sudan and Morocco.

Many US presidents have dreamed of normalizing relations between the Arabs and Israel, but Trump was willing to make a deal and promised to sell weapons, but that is unlikely to be possible during Biden’s presidency. Like Trump, Biden may want to end the endless wars and reduce the US presence in West Asia. Saudi Arabia has learned in Yemen that the war can be started very easily, but it is very difficult to end it.

Aside from the volume of arms sales in West Asia, another issue to consider is conventional weapons sold in the region. Most American weapons in the region have been used in severe repression and human rights abuses, including in Egypt, in the Palestinian territories, and in Israeli attacks, and in recent years in the severest humanitarian catastrophe, the Saudi-led coalition invasion of Yemen. Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have given US-made weapons to militants in Yemen to gain influence, and some of those weapons have fallen into the hands of extremist Salafis.

The US methods and incentives to sell arms to West Asia are more in line with building business for defense contractors than building security in West Asia. Last year, Trump vetoed a bipartisan resolution ending US support for the Saudi war in Yemen, bypassed Congress and ignored the normal process of ratifying an 8 billion dollar arms deal with Saudi Arabia. Many cases of arms trade in West Asia have been problematic and destabilizing.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading