Normalization of Morocco’s Relations with Zionist Regime; Turning Israel into a Security Threat to Algeria

2021/01/10 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - Morocco is the last country that has taken measures for normalization of relations with the Zionist regime. This country, along with Egypt, Jordan, the UAE, Bahrain and Sudan, is the sixth country in the Arab world that establishes diplomatic relations with Israel. In return for the normalization of relations, Morocco received recognition of possession of Western Sahara. Mahmoud Fazeli – Expert on international affairs

Morocco occupied the territories after Spain’s withdrawal from Western Sahara in 1975, during clashes between the Polisario Front with Morocco and Mauritania. The United States was the first country to formally agree with Morocco’s demand for the possession of Western Sahara. The US-Morocco agreement provides for the opening of a US consulate in the Western Sahara and investment in the region.

In the Israel-Morocco official statement the “opening of a direct flight, the reopening of liaison offices, the return to diplomatic relations and ties at all levels, and cooperation in various fields” have been agreed upon. Although Israel recently signed an agreement for the establishment of relations with the UAE, Bahrain and Bhutan, and is negotiating with Sudan, none of those agreements in terms of normalization of relations has been as sensitive as the relations with Morocco.

Morocco King’s betrayal of Arab leaders in 1967

Prior to the creation of Israel, there were 300,000 Jews living in Morocco, which has the largest Jewish community in North Africa with hundreds of thousands of Jews. Tel Aviv appreciates Rabat’s help in the Six-Day War in the 1960s. King Hassan II of Morocco at that time provided Israel with valuable information about the leaders of the Arab states and their military and armed status, as well as the fact that they were disunited. That is why Israel attacked the Egyptian Air Force in 1967 in a preemptive strike. Shortly afterwards, Mossad came to Rabat’s aid. Rabat had asked Mossad to find the whereabouts of “Mahdi Ben Baraka” as Rabat felt being threatened by him who was the leader of the National Union of Popular Forces (opposition) in Morocco. Mossad also deceived him and took him to France, where he was later assassinated by the Moroccan security agents in Paris.

King Mohammed IV of Morocco: “Zionism, the perpetrator of crime”

Rabat, which was active in the Middle East peace process, played an important role in the 1977 peace agreement between Egypt and Israel. Of course, relations between Morocco and Israel were at times hostile, and in 1959 King Mohammed IV described Zionism as a perpetrator of crime and banned immigration of his country’s Jews to Israel, saying it would strengthen the Israeli army. When Hassan II came to power in Morocco, Jews were allowed to immigrate to Israel in exchange for money. 60,000 Moroccan Jews immigrated to Israel for 50 million dollars. Rabat and Tel Aviv secretly established diplomatic relations in the 1990s, which were cut off by Rabat during the Second Palestinian Intifada but resumed in 2002. The Palestinians these days oppose the normalization of relations and believe that this agreement should not be reached before the final agreement between Israel and Palestine.

Morocco receives between 50,000 to 70,000 Jewish tourists each year, most of who come indirectly from Israel. From this new Christian year, Israeli Airlines will operate a direct 787 flight from Tel Aviv to Rabat every week. Prior to the normalization of relations, Israelis could travel to Morocco, but there was no direct flight between Tel Aviv and Rabat, and special visas were issued for Israeli passports. Israeli-Moroccan trade relations have never been severed, reaching 149 million dollars between 2014 up to 2017 according to official Moroccan statistics. The Moroccan media refer to this investment as a “big opportunity”.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called on King Mohammed of Morocco to pay an official visit to Israel. The media in Rabat and Tel Aviv refer to the phone call as “very warm and friendly”. The Moroccan officers’ liaison office will open soon in Tel Aviv. The King of Morocco has expressed satisfaction over the reactivation of the cooperation mechanism between the two sides.

Algerian officials have expressed opposition to the normalization of relations with the Zionist regime through various literatures and have shown opposition to the new Moroccan policy by using terms such as “humiliating deal, stigma, selling the nation’s honor, discrediting, endangering the region, multifaceted betrayal, and defending the right of the Sahrawi people to self-determination”. The use of such literature and instrumental use of the media in this regard has met with the reaction of the Prime Minister of Morocco.

The Sahara is undoubtedly a special case for Algeria as in the past, and the view that tensions in Western Sahara can only be resolved through the enforcement of international law and the firm conviction of the United Nations and the African Union will remain on the agenda of the Algerian officials. It seems that the normalization agreement between Morocco and the Zionist regime changed the attitude towards the Zionist regime in Algeria to some extent; because Israel is no longer that enemy far from the borders, rather it has turned into a security threat for Algeria.

So far, the parties of the National Liberation Front, the Democratic National Rally, Hams, the Future Front, the National Construction Movement, the New Generation and the Workers’ Party, as well as the Muslim Ulema and some Algerian civil society organizations, have somehow condemned the developments. Close positions by Algeria’s biggest Islamic parties, such as the Movement of Society for Peace and the Justice and Development Front, and leftist parties, such as the socialist groups and the Labor Party, and even introduction of several bills in the parliament in opposition to normalization of relations with Israel, could indicate unprecedented consensus among the country’s opposition with different tendencies.

The Polisario Front, a political-military organization in Western Sahara, was formed in 1973 as a resistance group against Spanish colonial rule in Western Sahara with an aim of gaining independence of the region. After the Spanish withdrawal in 1976, the Polisario established the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic in the former Spanish colony, opposing Spain’s move to divide Western Sahara between Morocco and Mauritania. Mauritania and Polisario made peace in 1979, returning the southern part of the Sahrawi Republic (known as Wadi al-Dhahab) to the republic, but the Kingdom of Maghreb occupied the entire northern part of Western Sahara, known as al-Saqiyah al-Hamra’a and annexed it to its soil.

Recognizing the independence of Western Sahara, the African Union accepted the membership of the Polisario Front. While Morocco calls for self-rule in the Western Sahara and presence of a local government and parliament under its rule and argues that if a referendum is to be held it should be about the autonomy of the region and not its secession from Morocco, but the Polisario Front opposes the plan and calls for a referendum on the fate of Western Sahara. The recent agreement could escalate clashes between Morocco and the Polisario Front rebels.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading