Dimensions of Joe Biden’s Middle East Policy

2021/01/01 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online – Joe Biden, despite repeatedly emphasizing his support for Israel, opposes some of Trump's unilateral actions on the issue of peace, the annexation of more territories in the West Bank, and calls for the US to return to the two-state solution. Dr. Tahmoures Gholami - Expert on American Issues

Following the victory of Joe Biden and the change of the US government on the 20th of January 2021 Biden’s policies in various fields have been considered by many experts and policymakers in the country. Based on the positions of key figures in Biden’s government, it can be said that the US Middle East policy towards the Donald Trump era continues in some areas and changes in others.

As a Democratic leader and vice president of Barack Obama, Biden has a look at the international system that previous presidents, including Barack Obama, had. A look at Biden’s past positions during the Obama presidency, as well as recent statements by him and his close advisers, reveals the fact that trying to strengthen the international system and return to the multilateral policy will be Biden’s grand strategy in the international arena.

At the regional level too, the Middle East will be one of Biden’s most important areas of interest. Despite repeatedly emphasizing his support for Israel, Biden opposes some of Trump’s unilateral actions on the issue of peace, the annexation of more territories in the West Bank, and the return of the United States to a policy of supporting the two-state plan.

Regarding Saudi Arabia, Biden has taken a critical approach to Washington’s longtime partner in the Persian Gulf during his presidential campaign. Members of the US Congress, especially Democrats, have repeatedly called for an end to Saudi Arabia’s support in the Yemeni war, both individually and collectively, in the form of individual bills, and have blamed Muhammad bin Salman for the assassination of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggy.

Despite all the differences between Turkey and the United States during Trump’s presidency, the continuation of Trump’s presidency was favorable to Turkey. The commitment and insistence of the US Congress to put pressure on Turkey on the one hand and the existence of numerous unresolved issues in relations between the two countries on the other hand and the greater sensitivity of the Democratic Party to Turkey’s policies despite Donald Trump’s indifference are three main factors causing Ankara’s concern about Biden presidency. In general, Ankara officials are well aware that their friendly policies towards Russia and their critical and even hostile policies towards the European Union, which Trump favored, as well as their Middle East policies, will not be met with Biden in power On the other hand, Biden has explicitly spoken of the need to oust Erdogan. Therefore, Turkey is not waiting for favorable relations with the United States under Biden; In the meantime, however, the pragmatism and flexibility of Turkish foreign policy should be considered as a determining variable.

Biden has long been heavily involved in US policy in Iraq. As a senator, he supported George W. Bush’s 2003 invasion of Iraq, but opposed the increase in US troops in Iraq as attacks on US troops intensified in 2007. Biden is one of the main proponents of a strategy called “extra counter-terrorism”. This approach emphasizes the fight against terrorist networks in foreign countries, using small groups of US Special Forces and offensive air strikes instead of deploying large numbers of troops. This counter-terrorism strategy is inspired by the Obama administration’s policy of fighting jihadists and other militant groups around the world, including in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq, West Africa, the Horn of Africa, and the Arabian Peninsula. This type of operation also included direct targeting of US-based militants, such as Anwar al-Awlaki.

In the meantime, one of the most important Middle East issues for Biden will be Iran. According to Biden and other key figures, there is no doubt that Biden will return to the nuclear deal, and there are many reasons why the United States will return to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of action. But in the meantime, Biden also expects talks with Iran on regional and missile issues; because, first of all, Biden knows that he has the support of Europe, the countries of the region, and possibly even China and Russia, for talks in these areas.

Second, the American elite has come to the conclusion that the United States, influenced by Obama’s experience of emphasizing multilateralism and influenced by Trump’s experience of unilateralism, is able to impose tough and effective sanctions on any country in the shortest possible time. Therefore, they are not worried about the fact that if the sanctions against Iran are lifted, Tehran will not be willing to talk in other areas. It was in this regard that Biden said in a statement that Tehran officials know that the means of sanctions against that country are always available. Therefore, in order to prove their good faith, the return of the United States to the UN Security Council is inevitable, and they are not worried about lifting the sanctions.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

An Analysis of the Recent Elections in Turkey

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Turkey’s March 31 local elections, which ended with the opposition’s victory and Erdogan’s party’s defeat, is considered an important “decisive point” in the future of Turkey’s domestic and foreign policy developments.
It determines the fate of several important political issues, in addition to the election of mayors and local managers for the next five years.
Hamid Khosayand – expert on regional issues

The strategy of the Israeli regime to get rid of the defeat in Gaza

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: It has been about six months since the Israeli regime attacked the Gaza Strip in October 2023. In the initial weeks and months of the attack, many analysts believed that the Israeli regime, based on its usual practice in wars after the Palestinian intifada, would agree to a truce and end the war after inflicting multiple casualties and damages.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University professor

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

An Analysis of the Recent Elections in Turkey

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Turkey’s March 31 local elections, which ended with the opposition’s victory and Erdogan’s party’s defeat, is considered an important “decisive point” in the future of Turkey’s domestic and foreign policy developments.
It determines the fate of several important political issues, in addition to the election of mayors and local managers for the next five years.
Hamid Khosayand – expert on regional issues

The strategy of the Israeli regime to get rid of the defeat in Gaza

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: It has been about six months since the Israeli regime attacked the Gaza Strip in October 2023. In the initial weeks and months of the attack, many analysts believed that the Israeli regime, based on its usual practice in wars after the Palestinian intifada, would agree to a truce and end the war after inflicting multiple casualties and damages.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University professor

Loading