Saudi Efforts to Reduce Tensions in the Region & the Need for Qatar’s Vigilance

2020/12/14 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online - An expert on Saudi Arabia said that reducing tensions is the concurrent desire of the three countries of Turkey, Qatar and Saudi Arabia, said: The Saudi concern over the return of the United States to the Iran Nuclear Agreement (also known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action) and boosting Iran’s economic strength have prompted Riyadh to minimize tensions with the Arab and Sunni fronts before Trump leaves the White House and Biden takes over in order to confront Iran with a new lineup. But the important point in this regard is the vigilance of Qatar. In other words, Doha should be careful not to be caught by the Saudi conspiracy against Iran, which was beside Qatar during the difficult years of sanctions.

Sajjad Mohseni, in an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, said that Saudi-Turkish relations had cooled in recent years due to conflict of interests and at least disparate interests in cases such as Libya, Qatar and in some parts of Syria. The recent remarks of Saudi Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan, on the one hand, and reports in the Kuwaiti media, on the other, showed that Saudi Arabia is pursuing a policy of détente in the region.

He added that the G20 summit in Riyadh could have been a good opportunity for Saudi officials to consult, but holding the summit virtually damaged Saudi intentions. However, there are reports that tensions with Turkey and Qatar are easing.

 

 Tension in Saudi Relations with Turkey and Qatar Reducing

The Saudi analyst continued: “The conflict of interests among Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Qatar, both ideologically and geopolitically, have led to tense relations between the three countries. This tension intensified from the developments in the Arab world in 2011 in Egypt and the emergence of the Brotherhood and then led to the Libyan crisis and the siege of Qatar and the severance of relations with this Arab state.

Mohseni called on all the three countries, Turkey, Qatar and Saudi Arabia, to work to reduce tensions, saying “each of these countries has its own reasons for reducing tensions.” Qatar is planning to host the 2022 World Cup, which requires the cooperation of neighbouring countries in the field of security and logistics, so reducing tensions with Saudi Arabia and using its airspace can greatly reduce Qatar’s costs.

He added: “Currently, many Qatari flights to Europe and the United States travel longer distances through Iran, which has increased the cost of airlines. On the other hand, before the siege of Qatar, most of Qatar’s food was supplied from Saudi Arabia, which increased the cost of access to strategic products.”

Saudi Arabia, the Big Failure of Yemeni Scene

Mohseni also referred to recent developments in Saudi political approaches, saying that Saudi Arabia had experienced a brief period of political extraversion and had made little significant progress in Syria, Yemen and Libya. It can also be called a “big failure” in Yemen. The monthly spending of about $ 7 billion on the southern front has put a lot of economic pressure on the country. Riyadh is now seeking to resolve tensions from the outer and light layers to pave the way for a solution to the Yemeni crisis, which seems to be happening in the Biden era.

Rise of Democrats and Saudi Efforts to Reduce Tensions

Mohseni explained that, naturally, the US elections and the coming to power of the Democrats have affected Saudi Arabia’s approach to reducing tensions: Saudi Arabia during the Trump era had the maximum support of the White House in domestic and foreign policy, on the other hand, Washington’s approach to Tehran is the most important variable that the Saudi government is considering. The Trump administration considered maximum pressure on Iran to be the most important approach, and this policy largely served the interests of Saudi Arabia.

He described Biden’s inauguration as a reminder of Obama’s policies toward Iran, saying “Saudi concern over the US return to the JCPOA (Iran Nuclear Agreement) and the boosting of Iran’s economic power, which means increasing its influence in Saudi Arabia, has prompted Saudi Arabia to try before the end.” The Trump era and Biden’s coming to power will minimize their tensions with the Arab and Sunni fronts in order to confront Iran with a new arrangement.

According to this expert on international affairs; According to Riyadh, during the Biden period, the possibility of a regional balance shifting in Iran’s favour increases, so the Saudi government must be comfortable with a possible confrontation with Iran.

Saudi Arabia Seeks to Unite Arabs against Iran

Mohseni said: “Riyadh believes that in the possible negotiations between Biden and the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Arab states of the region should be consulted and the interests of these countries should be taken into account. Accordingly, from this country’s point of view, first, a single stance should be taken by the Arab countries and then become the consulting party in the case of Iran. At the moment, the effort to build integration is certainly related to Biden’s approach to Iran.”

He stressed that any developments in the region, especially in the field of alliances and coalitions, have a “butterfly effect” on the policies of other countries in the region. It continued to be an attempt to maximize the interests of the (P)GCC countries with a focus on Saudi Arabia, and if Saudi Arabia does not achieve this and the Biden administration returns to the negotiating table with Iran, the regional balance will be upset to the detriment of Saudi Arabia.

The international affairs analyst explained that if Saudi Arabia succeeds, the interests of the Islamic Republic of Iran could be overshadowed: “In the economic sphere, the revenue from providing Iran’s air space for the passage of the Qatari air fleet will be lost; moreover, there could be cohesion among the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council countries aimed at reducing Iran’s political influence in the region especially since Saudi Arabia has established good relations with another pole of the regional power, namely Turkey. But the important point in this regard is the vigilance of Qatar. Doha should be careful not to be caught by the Saudi conspiracy against Iran, which sided with Qatar during the difficult years of the sanctions.

Mohseni continued: The domino of establishing relations with the Zionist regime should also be added to these cases. In such a case, the effort to pursue a policy of “isolation” against Iran will continue, and using the leverage to negotiate with the United States to reduce sanctions and pressure, even verbally and not necessarily practically, can be counterbalanced.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading