Turkey on the verge of involvement in the Yemen case

2020/12/07 | Note, political, top news

Strategic Council Online—Editorial: Turkey is one of the main regional players which has been pursuing an aggressive foreign policy during the past several years—a country which once prioritized in its foreign policy the zero-tension approach with its neighbors but has now turned down that policy by entering into various levels of political, security, military and field operational engagements in the West Asia, the Caucasus and North Africa regions. In fact, you can find very few hot spots in the region in which Turkey has not been actively involved. Hamid Khoshayand-International issues analyst

Whisper of involvement in Yemen

Recently and after the end of the conflict in Karabakh region in which Turkey was trying to have a serious military, field operation and political involvement, there are whispers of the Turkish involvement in the Yemen case. This is while Yasin Aktay, Erdogan’s chief advisor and one of his main aids, published an article in Yeni Safak newspaper affiliated with the ruling AK Party in Turkey in which he raised the issue of possible Turkish engagement in the Yemen war. “As Turkey saved Libya and Azerbaijan, will it also be engaged in the Operation Decisive Storm to save Yemen?” he asked. This is a dangerous and threatening message for the Saudis to alarm them that they should prepare for the Turkish involvement in Yemen.

 

The objective of Turkey in Yemen involvement

At the first glance, there is a slight relevance in geopolitical, field operational and economic terms between Turkey and Yemen in order to analyze and justify the Ankara’s engagement in the Yemen case. Given the specific conditions of Yemen particularly in terms of t role of foreign players as well as the arrangement of foreign and domestic elements engaged in the Yemen war and the level and domain of their role-playing, which were determined from the beginning of the war and conflict, Yemen may not have been a main target of the Turkish foreign policy. However, in spite of all such considerations, Turkey is entering Yemen. The main objectives of Turkey are as following:

  1. The necessity of advancing the neo-Ottoman policy

The first objective could be traced in the neo-Ottoman policy of the incumbent Turkish government in West Asia. Within the framework of such a policy, Turkey is trying to expand its sphere of influence with the goal of reviving the political (and not territorial) influence and dignity of the former Ottoman Empire which also encompassed Yemen as its territory but lost it in 1918.   The revival of the greatness and dignity of the former Ottoman Empire is one of the main foreign policy goals of the Erdogan government which has been trying hard to realize it. In the belief of Erdogan who plays a distinguished role in the main foreign policy issues of Turkey, this country is suffering from a historical oppression which he believes was imposed on Turkey after the First World War by the allied forces which ultimately led to the collapse of the Ottoman Empire. Erdogan still feels strong bonds with the Ottoman Empire and is trying hard to revive it in the today’s world. And Erdogan is ready to pay its price. The belief in historical oppression and liberation from such oppression which has resulted in new ambitions originating from the Ottoman traditions is the main driving force and source of many behaviours and regional and trans-regional policies of Turkey under the leadership of Erdogan during the past several years. Even though Yemen was located far from the capital of the Ottoman Empire, it was of special significance for Istanbul. On one hand, control over Yemen could have provided the necessary legitimacy for the Ottoman Empire given the proximity and governance through Yemen over Mecca and Medina as the heart of the Muslim world. On the other hand, Yemen’s location and ports at the crossroad of regional commerce in the Red Sea were considered to be one of the main ports of trade of the east and west with India. Therefore, Yemen is located in one of the world’s most important marine corridors and a neighbouring state for Saudi Arabia. This is of great significance for Turkey.

  1. The necessity arising from the Muslim Brotherhood in foreign policy

The second reason behind Ankara’s efforts to be engaged in the case of Yemen is hidden in the Turkey foreign policy based on the approaches close to the Muslim Brotherhood. Experience indicates that Turkey has rendered serious support for Muslim Brotherhood groups anywhere capable of playing a significant role in the domestic equations of a country or region. Even though such a serious support required presence in regional trouble spots, Turkey has put it high on its agenda. Libya and Turkey’s support provided to the National Unity government which is aligned with Muslim Brotherhood ideology could be interpreted in this angel. From this viewpoint, Turkey’s efforts to be engaged in the case of Yemen are related to Ankara’s support for a Muslim Brotherhood group called al-Islah (Yemeni Congregation for Reform) Party which was an important part of the resigned government of al-Hadi. The al-Islah party, whose members are in the Marib Province–a traditional base of influence and social birthplace of Muslim Brotherhood–has faced differences and gaps in recent months with the Saudis and al-Hadi as the operational events on the ground in Yemen have reached a deadlock. Turkey in recent months has been trying to use al-Islah with tendency to Muslim Brotherhood ideology and requires foreign support to maintain its political status to create tension with Saudi Arabia. Al-Islah can pave the way for the Turkish engagement in the war in Yemen. From this viewpoint, al-Islah would determine the quality and quantity of the role Turkey can play in Yemen. Involvement and presence in Yemen by Turkey is compatible with the Islamist ideology of the Muslim Brotherhood.

  1. Accomplishing a regional supremacy through weakening Saudi Arabia

The rivalry between Ankara and Riyadh could form another solid ground for Turkey—which benefits from the potential created by the Muslim Brotherhood in Yemen— to engage in the Yemen case. The Turkish government is well aware that the Saudis feel vulnerable in Yemen more than any other place defined by Saudi Arabia as its strategic depth. Turkey is trying to gain a high political status in the Muslim world and brand itself as the superpower of the region of West Asia. Efforts to attain regional supremacy have placed Turkey in more confrontation with Saudi Arabia compared to other countries. From the viewpoint of Saudis, Turkey’s efforts to gain supremacy in the Muslim world means nothing but the undermining status of Wahhabism (and the financial benefits and economic, political and social capitals arising from Wahhabism) which has been theorized in the Saudi royal court against the Muslim Brotherhood. For this reason, the board of senior Ulemas of the Saudi royal court recently issued a fatwa (religious edict) and declared Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization and a deviated and dispersive group which does not represent Islam—something which raised the agony of Ankara alongside the sanctions imposed on the purchase of Turkish goods in Saudi Arabia and the prohibition of the travel of Saudi citizens as tourists to Turkey. All these have made the Erdogan government more determined and insistent on entering the case of Yemen with the goal of weakening Saudi Arabia in political and field operational equations.

Conclusion

The study of recent developments demonstrates signs of Turkish involvement in the Yemen case with the objectives outlined above. This is while some informed military and security sources in the region claim to have spotted Turkish drones getting close to the line of fire in South Yemen to combat forces commanded by the United Arab Emirates. Turkish involvement as a new player with its objectives and special interests in Yemen would add to the complexities of the situation in Yemen while ultimately resulting in the weakening of the Saudi front in the political, security and field operational equations in Yemen.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

An Analysis of the Recent Elections in Turkey

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Turkey’s March 31 local elections, which ended with the opposition’s victory and Erdogan’s party’s defeat, is considered an important “decisive point” in the future of Turkey’s domestic and foreign policy developments.
It determines the fate of several important political issues, in addition to the election of mayors and local managers for the next five years.
Hamid Khosayand – expert on regional issues

The strategy of the Israeli regime to get rid of the defeat in Gaza

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: It has been about six months since the Israeli regime attacked the Gaza Strip in October 2023. In the initial weeks and months of the attack, many analysts believed that the Israeli regime, based on its usual practice in wars after the Palestinian intifada, would agree to a truce and end the war after inflicting multiple casualties and damages.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University professor

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

An Analysis of the Recent Elections in Turkey

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Turkey’s March 31 local elections, which ended with the opposition’s victory and Erdogan’s party’s defeat, is considered an important “decisive point” in the future of Turkey’s domestic and foreign policy developments.
It determines the fate of several important political issues, in addition to the election of mayors and local managers for the next five years.
Hamid Khosayand – expert on regional issues

The strategy of the Israeli regime to get rid of the defeat in Gaza

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: It has been about six months since the Israeli regime attacked the Gaza Strip in October 2023. In the initial weeks and months of the attack, many analysts believed that the Israeli regime, based on its usual practice in wars after the Palestinian intifada, would agree to a truce and end the war after inflicting multiple casualties and damages.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University professor

Loading