Islamabad’s worried about sectarian interventions in Pakistan

2020/11/28 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert of the issues of the subcontinent says Pakistani officials are worried about acts against their national security by foreign countries as tensions rise between India and Pakistan in the eastern borders of India.

Pirmohammad Mollazehi said Pakistani authorities believe that foreign spy services have invested heavily on relocating Daesh elements from Afghanistan to Pakistan and creating instability across the country.

He told the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations that tens of millions of dollars are being spent by foreign intelligence services to relocate terrorists from Afghanistan to Pakistan to cause havoc.

“The foreign minister and army spokesperson of Pakistan have expressed concern over such relocations and probable instability in Pakistan by Daesh elements as the Daesh in Afghanistan is different from the Daesh in the Middle East. The Daesh in Afghanistan is composed of several ethnic groups who have gained a lot of experience in Iraq and Syria fighting alongside Arab forces.”

He said the Pakistani officials are also worried about movements and activities of Tahrik Taliban Pakistan—a Pashtun group related to Daesh acting against the federal government of Pakistan.

He added that Tahrik Taliban Pakistan has succeeded in attracting the Lashkar-e-Taiba and Lashkar-e-Jhangvi Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan, saying Haraka al-Ansar of Bangladesh and the Indian Mujahideen have also joined Daesh as concerns are high for Daesh and Al-Qaeda to get linked and form a united command.

Referring to the accusations exchanged between Pakistan and Afghanistan on the presence and organization of Daesh, Mollazehi said Daesh has recruited almost all Sunni radical forces and organized them in Afghanistan with the aim of establishing the Oriental Khalifate or the Greater Khorasan Khalifate.

“In some cases, accusations levelled by Pakistan and Afghanistan against each other on Daesh are false and for propaganda purposes. However, what is important here is that Daesh is seeking to establish a Khalifate and has now mobilized its forces in Afghanistan.”

He said Daesh poses a great danger to Pakistan as they are considered Jihadi groups capable of recruiting terrorists.

“New tensions in the eastern border of Pakistan with India could be assessed from this viewpoint. Such tensions are in fact reciprocal and take place in reaction to Pakistan’s actions in Indian Kashmir.”

Mollazehi said Pakistan was supporting for a long period of time some radical Islamist groups in Kashmir and Afghanistan; and under the present conditions, Pakistan is worried that the National Security Agency of India, as a reciprocal measure against Pakistan, could be cooperating with the Afghans to force Pakistan to stop its activities in Kashmir and Afghanistan.

Mollazehi believes that Pakistani authorities are seriously concerned about two districts: the Pashtun-residing areas in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and other tribal areas and the Eastern Baluchistan area which is controlled by Pakistan.

He pointed out that Pakistani intelligence believes Indian and Afghan secret services are united to get links to anti-Pakistani groups.

“The Pakistanis are seriously worried about it and feel threatened of it. Pakistan is not considered a united nation in national terms and has composed of four important tribes in four important states. The Punjabis are dominant as they outnumber other ethnicities and this has created a negative reaction among other groups. Among other tribes, there are also groups seeking independence and self-autonomy. ”

Mollazehi said Pakistan is vulnerable in this respect and has no other choice but to reach understanding and get along with Afghanistan and India if such concerns are real.

Stressing the necessity of creating an understanding between India and Pakistan in this respect, he said the Pashtun tribes had a meeting in Miranshah among the leaders of important armed tribes and expressed solidarity with Afghanistan, calling for the return of Pashtuns to Afghanistan.

“This is very dangerous for Pakistanis”.

Mollazehi further referred to the visit by Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan to Kabul, saying that he discussed issues of national security with the Afghan president and officials.

“The Pakistanis are seriously worried about such developments which pose a threat to their national security. Such tribes are armed and fighters. They even defeated the British and the Russians in historical conflicts. It seems that Pakistan has reached a point in which it has to make an important decision: either it should preserve its national unity and review its policies at the regional level, or it should risk disintegration as it remains vulnerable.”

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

Loading