US prevention from Europe’s role playing in Afghanistan peace process

2020/09/11 | Note, political, top news

Khalil Zad didn’t allow Europe to play the main role in the negotiations and faded Europe role in political process. Well, The European’s concerns about Afghanistan are not included in the US-Taliban agreement. European countries and the E.U use Iran and Afghanistan’s issues to answer the U.S unilateral actions. Mostafa Hashemi – Afghanistan expert

Ambassador Khalil Zad tried a lot and he made a new deal with Taliban on February 29, 2020. In this Agreement, the two sides agreed to make peace after releasing All of Taliban’s Prisoners by Afghan Government.

Afghan Government were not allowed to participate in the negotiations between The U.S and Taliban, so after signing the agreement, Ashraf Ghani set a new condition in front of this deal. When Trump noticed Afghan government activities had sabotaged the peace process, he sent his foreign minister secretary general. Mike Pompeo to Kabul to negotiate and persuade the Afghan Government. Over the Pompeo’s meeting, he threatened Afghans by cutting their budget by 1 billion dollars. After Pompeo’s visit, the peace process accelerated and most of Taliban’s prisoners were arrested by government released and just 400 prisoners remained in prison and Ashraf Ghani declared  these prisoners all dangerous and Louis Jirga should order the releasing of them. This is another obstacle in front of the peace process that Trump is following it. So After holding Luis Jirga, the delegation of Afghans declared there is no problem about releasing these people. They issued a political statement and asked to Afghan government to release the remaining prisoners. But after a few days, Australia and also France government ask Ashraf Ghani not to release some prisoners because they killed some of France and Australian’s soldiers in Afghanistan battle.

Right Now, we see the Intra-Afghans negotiations have stopped and both sides are waitting for the future. Therefore the main question is why France opposed releasing the Taliban prisoners by Ashraf Ghani?

Over the negotiation between Khalil Zad as the special envoy of The U.S and Taliban, the EU tried to engage and influence the negotiations and share the Europe Concerns about future of Afghanistan with other countries who are playing the main role in Afghanistan. The EU delegates, Ambassador Roland Kobia who is the EU special envoy to Afghanistan and also Ambassador Markus Potzel, Germany’s special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan have traveled to this region for many times and they held meetings with officials and talked about mutual concerns about Afghanistan. The European Union tried to play a significant role in the new deal between the U.S and Taliban, but Khalil Zad didn’t allow Europe to play the main role in the negotiations and faded Europe role in political process. Well, The European’s concerns about Afghanistan are not included in the US-Taliban agreement.

European countries and the E.U use Iran and Afghanistan’s issues to answer the U.S unilateral actions. Probably everybody remembers when Bush administration made a decision to attack Iraq, and Afghanistan after Al-Aqedah carried out an attack on the World Trade Organization Twin Towers. G.W.Bush the former president of the U.S, didn’t consult with any of the European Countries and he didn’t pay attention to the position of the Security Council on Iraq and Afghanistan. Bush unilaterally attacked Iraq and Afghanistan  and after this invasion, the European Troika decided to confront The U.S by involving in Iran’s Nuclear Issues. So they confronted the unilateralism created by the United states.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading