Iraqi Popular Protests and US Projection against Iran

2020/03/17 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online: An expert on West Asian affairs said the trend of America’s expulsion from Iraq has started, adding that the Americans were trying to accuse Iran before the public opinion of Iraq by suggesting that the attack on al-Taji camp was Iran’s work while this is a projection and escape forward. He said the Iraqi people's protest against the US occupation in Iraq has nothing to do with Iran.

In an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, Reza Mirabian cited the attacks on the al-Taji military base and noted: Hashd al-Shaabi groups such as the Hezbollah movement, the Najba movement or the Asaeb Ahl al-Haq, said the United States must implement the Iraqi parliament’s decision that they must leave Iraq, and if political solutions were not effective they will have to oust the United States by armed means. The protest attack against the al-Taji military base appears to have taken place to this end.

On the repercussions of the US attacks on Hashd al-Shaabi bases, the expert said these measures would not end with American reactions. In fact, US actions could trigger violence and armed confrontations.

The protest attack on al-Taji “is not the end of the US response,” he said, “but the US actions may intensify violence in future developments and armed movements.”

 

Accusing Iran Is Projection

Referring to US officials’ allegations that Iran was behind the attack, the West Asian affairs analyst added: “This action of the US authorities is projection and escape forward, and they themselves know these attacks have nothing to do with Iran. The Americans are trying to provoke Iraqi public opinion by claiming that these actions are done by Iran, while the Iraqi nation’s protest response to the US occupation in Iraq has nothing to do with Iran. They formally withdrew from Iraq in 2011, recognizing it as an independent state and officially ending the occupation.

He added that after the events related to ISIS actions, motivated by the Americans, they were present in Iraqi bases slowly and without any prior agreement. The ISIS issue has been settled for several years, and there is no parliamentary approval or agreement for an official US presence in Iraq. The Iraqis also did not give any official base to the Americans, so if ISIS were the pretext for their presence it was temporary and has ended with the parliamentary vote.

America Regards Iraq a Country under Occupation

Mirabian emphasized: Americans do not want to leave Iraq. Trump said in his election campaign that his predecessor Obama made a mistake to leave Iraq and that they must make up for that mistake and that America has a share from the Iraqi oil! They regard Iraq an occupied country and are after its huge oil reserves, and they explicitly and implicitly announce this. Even in reaction to the Iraqi parliament’s resolution, they said it was unnecessary and was adopted by a part of the Iraqi people.

He said: “The Americans have shown in words and deed that they do not want to leave Iraq, because they do not want to abide by the parliamentary law of an independent state, with the attacks on their troops they are paying the price for their behaviour in Iraq.”

Process of Expelling US from Iraq Has Begun

The West Asian affairs expert on how to expel Americans from Iraq also said: “This is definitely a time-consuming process.” The Americans will not leave Iraq until they are forced to, and for the time being, they insist to remain in Iraq unless the cost of their stay in Iraq is so heavy that their presence would not be economical.

Mirabian also stressed: “This process has begun and what we are seeing is the beginning of an action taken by Iraqi forces that will continue in the future.”

He considered the outcome of the upcoming US election to be effective in the withdrawal of US forces from Iraq and continued: “It seems that the current American rulers insist on staying in Iraq and are even ready to pay the price.”

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

An Analysis of the Recent Elections in Turkey

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Turkey’s March 31 local elections, which ended with the opposition’s victory and Erdogan’s party’s defeat, is considered an important “decisive point” in the future of Turkey’s domestic and foreign policy developments.
It determines the fate of several important political issues, in addition to the election of mayors and local managers for the next five years.
Hamid Khosayand – expert on regional issues

The strategy of the Israeli regime to get rid of the defeat in Gaza

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: It has been about six months since the Israeli regime attacked the Gaza Strip in October 2023. In the initial weeks and months of the attack, many analysts believed that the Israeli regime, based on its usual practice in wars after the Palestinian intifada, would agree to a truce and end the war after inflicting multiple casualties and damages.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University professor

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

An Analysis of the Recent Elections in Turkey

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Turkey’s March 31 local elections, which ended with the opposition’s victory and Erdogan’s party’s defeat, is considered an important “decisive point” in the future of Turkey’s domestic and foreign policy developments.
It determines the fate of several important political issues, in addition to the election of mayors and local managers for the next five years.
Hamid Khosayand – expert on regional issues

The strategy of the Israeli regime to get rid of the defeat in Gaza

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: It has been about six months since the Israeli regime attacked the Gaza Strip in October 2023. In the initial weeks and months of the attack, many analysts believed that the Israeli regime, based on its usual practice in wars after the Palestinian intifada, would agree to a truce and end the war after inflicting multiple casualties and damages.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University professor

Loading