Trump’s Unannounced & Intrusive Trip to Afghanistan

2019/12/04 | interview, political, top news

Strategic Council Online: Former Director of Afghanistan Affairs Department at IRI Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated that the US President's unannounced visit to Afghanistan and presence at Bagram military base was an unusual act contrary to the independence of an independent state. He added: Although the US claims that talks to reach a peace deal are on track, but they are unlikely to have a tangible outcome in the current situation, and after Trump's trip to Afghanistan, Taliban officials have said they are not ready for peace talks unless an agreement is signed.

Speaking to the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, Mohsen Pakaeen explained the reasons for Trump’s unannounced trip to Afghanistan and the criticisms voiced by the Afghan people and political figures. He said the trip was primarily aimed at boosting Mr. Ashraf Ghani in the presidential election the result of which is not clear yet. The question now is whether Mr. Ashraf Ghani will be the next Afghan President or Mr. Abdullah Abdullah. Mr. Trump’s move and Mr. Ashraf Ghani’s presence in Bagram were unusual and in violation of the independence of an independent state and showed Mr. Trump is seeking to support Mr. Ashraf Ghani.

Trump’s Election Campaign Trip

Pakaeen cited the impact of Trump’s trip to Afghanistan on the 2020 US presidential election and noted: “Trump has no major achievements in his foreign policy, and in such circumstances he hopes to be able to leave a positive impact in Afghanistan. In particular, he is trying to push ahead with the peace deal with the Taliban while at the same time fulfilling the promise it made to the American people to pull troops out of Afghanistan, or at least reduce their number.

The expert also said that the US president conducts these visits traditionally once a year and visits US troops in the region. He went to Iraq last year and visited Afghanistan this year. In fact, Trump does this to boost the morale of American troops, impress the military and take advantage of it domestically. Of course, this trip may have other hidden goals that will be revealed in the future.

Taliban Negotiating on Several Fronts

Commenting on negotiations held between certain regional states and the Taliban with the participation of the Afghan government after the US-Taliban talks were halted, Pakaeen said: “Taliban are playing two roles. One is the political role in which they pursue their political activities as a political group and party, and the other is a military role whereby they continue to carry out their terrorist operations to further their political goals. As part of the Taliban’s political approach, the group has been negotiating with various countries, including Russia, China, Saudi Arabia, Iran and the United States, but it is unlikely they would reach real peace in Afghanistan.

He explained that the reason is that the Taliban is a totalitarian group seeking absolute supremacy in Afghanistan. The Taliban disregard other tribes and groups, such as the Hazaras, Uzbeks and Tajiks, and even many moderate Pashtuns disagree with the Taliban’s approach. Taliban itself is a totalitarian group in nature, so such an approach seems unlikely to succeed because the Taliban is trying to bypass the government and negotiate with other countries as a government.

US-Taliban Talks Unlikely to Progress

Commenting on Trump’s statement that the Taliban were ready to sign the peace and ceasefire agreements, Pakaeen said: “With regard to the Taliban’s main condition that US troops must withdraw from Afghanistan before any agreement could be signed it seems unlikely that the Taliban-US talks are going to have a tangible outcome, given that the Americans are now willing to keep their troops in Afghanistan, although both sides are propagating that the talks are going well. After Trump’s trip to Afghanistan, Taliban officials said they were not ready for peace talks unless the agreement was signed, so what the Americans said about the progress of the talks were denied and the Taliban declared their condition.

 

Iran’s Different Outlook on Negotiations with the Taliban

Referring to Iran’s talks with the Taliban, he noted: “Our talks with the Taliban are held in coordination with the Afghan government, and Iranian officials have repeatedly stated this. We are informing the Afghan government of the Taliban’s visit to Iran and our goal is to establish Afghan-Afghan dialogue.

“We believe that Afghan-Afghan talks without foreign interference, especially by trans-regional powers such as the United States, can be fruitful, and we encourage the Taliban to negotiate with the government in this context,” he added. If meetings are held they are in line with this goal but the Taliban think differently. The Taliban are trying to bypass the government and sometimes talk about being ready to negotiate with the government, but overall this has not gone ahead and in fact conflicts and hostilities between the government and the Taliban continue.

 

US Disrupts Stability and Security in Afghanistan

Concerning the effects of this US action on the Afghan government and domestic politics in the country, the diplomat emphasized: As long as US troops are in Afghanistan I doubt the country would see tranquility. I believe the only thing that can bring peace back to Afghanistan is the withdrawal of foreign forces, including the US troops. The Americans brought ISIS with them. The reality is that apart from the Taliban’s role, part of Afghanistan is now insecure by ISIS, and ISIS came to Afghanistan with US help. So it seems unlikely that there will be peace in the country as long as US troops are in Afghanistan.

Referring to the views of some Afghan groups who consider the US presence necessary for security in the country, he said: “The main purpose of the presence of NATO forces in Afghanistan, including the United States, was to train and empower the Afghan army so that it could provide security in Afghanistan and fight groups such as Taliban and these forces pull out later but this did not happen.”

“As long as US forces are present in Afghanistan, the Afghan army will not be powerful because it will not be subjected to a test,” Pakaeen said. Some parts of the government and groups have also raised the question that if the Americans leave, we cannot maintain security, but the reality is that in the current situation, the United States is the cause of insecurity in Afghanistan and if Afghanistan wants to be independent and have an independent army it has no choice but to try the era minus America and build a powerful military by trial and error.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading