Creating a Safe Zone in Northern Syria: A Trap for the Kurds?

Strategic Council Online: An analyst on regional issues pointing to a new US-Turkish plan to create a safe zone in northern Syria said the turn by Turkey towards Iran and Russia is a source of security concern for the White House and the Europeans. Washington is trying, by giving renewed promises, to prevent further Turkish alliance with Iran and Russia and shift the region's crisis management from Astana Process to Brussels and Washington.

Dr. Davoud Ahmadzadeh said that the plan to create a safe zone in northern Syria is not a new one and has already been pursued by the US and Turkey, adding: “There have always been differences between the United States and Turkey as two strategic allies over how to create this zone which has caused negotiations held in previous rounds to yield no results.

He added: “It is important to note how Ankara and Washington have assessed the situation in the region that they were both convinced to place the issue on their agenda and hold serious discussions about it.”

Commenting on the dispute between Turkey and the US in this respect, the analyst of regional issues said Turkey has a security attitude towards the Kurds and considers the three Syrian provinces – Aleppo, Raqqa and Hasaka – to be security zones and somehow seeks to delegate security to the so-called Liberation Front who receive orders directly from Turkey and are supported by Ankara.

He added: “We should keep in mind that Erdogan, the Turkish president, is sensitive to Kurdish security issues, and given what has happened in northern Iraq, he believes he can take this as a model for Syrian Kurds.  However, Syria’s disintegration could affect Kurdish areas inside Turkey, as well as exacerbate security issues for Turkish leaders. If a more serious discussion on the safe zone is raised, Turkey wants the so-called Liberation Front forces and the nationalist forces opposed to the Syrian government, who are directly guided and supported by Ankara be in charge of security in these regions.

Ahmadzadeh said that the US has not yet accepted to send troops to the region and take care of their management and opposition to the plan has faced it with hesitation and uncertainty.

On the current situation of the Syrian government in the fight against terrorists, the analyst said: “The Syrian government has the upper hand after the defeat of ISIS inside Syria and Iraq and has taken an offensive position. The remaining regions currently occupied by ISIS terrorists and Takfiri groups are about to be retaken by the Syrian government forces. Therefore, Syria strongly opposes any intervention, whether by Turkey or by the Americans.”

In the meantime, he said: “On the other hand, we should keep in mind that the Americans may betray the Syrian Kurds so that after being used by Washington they may be left alone and exposed to the direct invasion of Turkish forces. This concern makes the Syrian Kurds change their attitudes towards the government of Bashar al-Assad and the military and to boost their approach towards reconciliation and peace aimed at preserving the unity of this Syrian region more than ever before. Syria’s integration is possible through the unification of various ethnic groups within Syria, and if any agreement is reached, the Syrian Kurds will be more likely to approach Bashar al-Assad’s government to forge national unity against any secure zone than before.”

On an appropriate response by the Astana Process to this scheme, Ahmadzadeh explained: “If we review the process of past Astana meetings and take a look at previous understandings between Turkey, Iran, and Russia, we will see these efforts have been very effective in reducing tensions in the Syrian conflict areas. It was the management of the three countries that prevented the escalation of tensions and more acts of terrorist groups in various areas of Syria.”

He added: “A turn by Turkey towards Iran and Russia is a source of security concerns for the White House and the Europeans. Washington is trying, by giving renewed promises, to prevent further Turkish alliance with Iran and Russia and shift the region’s crisis management from Astana Process to Brussels and Washington.”

He said the influence of the US and the European Union on the crisis in Syria and the Middle East has declined very much, adding that the future of Syria and the whole region will be ensured by continuing constructive talks with Iran, Turkey, Russia and the parties involved in the crisis.

About the dangers of the US-Turkey project and its security implications for Syria, he said: “The presence of foreign troops from Turkey or any other country violates the national sovereignty of Syria, and without the Syrian government’s permission, the presence of foreign forces can pose security risks. Creating this safe zone may not only fail to reduce tension and provide security but can also lead to more conflicts. The Kurds by keeping away from the US and the European Union also appear to be able to engage in constructive negotiations with the Syrian government and other political groups, helping to forge national unity and prevent this scheme from being implemented.

Ahmadzadeh added: “Iran has repeatedly stated that the safe zone plan is a violation of Syria’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and cannot be accepted, but instead of such ideas, Syria-Syria talks and deployment of the army in crisis-stricken regions of Syria to provide conditions for national reconciliation and speeding up the national elections and establishing an inclusive government is the solution to Syria’s problems.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading