Signals of Failed US Anti-Palestine Resolution

2018/12/29 | Opinion, political

Strategic Council Online: A resolution that would have condemned the Palestinian group Hamas and its attacks on Israel failed to pass the United Nations on Thursday, despite an aggressive campaign by the United States and Israel to cast it as a vote on peace and terrorism. Hassan Hanizadeh - Middle East Expert

The U.S.-drafted resolution got 87 votes in favor and 57 against, with 33 abstentions, meaning it fell short of the required two-thirds majority needed to pass.

The vote also represented a political setback for the Trump administration, which had lobbied hard to get many Arab states to break from their routine support of the Palestinian position and support the anti-Hamas resolution. But all the Arab states voted against it, even those that have signed peace treaties with Israel and are otherwise seeing warming relations with its government.

It passed despite intimidation by Trump, who had threatened a day earlier to eliminate financial aid to member states who would vote against his decision, while Nikki Haley, the US ambassador to the UN, had warned that she would be “taking names” of those countries.

(The UN General Assembly also voted on a second resolution offered by Ireland and Namibia and pushed by the Palestinian Authority, in favor of a two-state solution. It includes condemnation of Israeli settlements and a reference to the parameters of a future peace agreement).

The resolution of the UN General Assembly states that any decision that leads to a change in character, status or population composition of Jerusalem is null and void and that UN member states should act in accordance with Security Council resolutions and not open diplomatic missions in Beitul Moqaddas.

It should be noted that the recent failure of the United States to advance the so-called “deal of the century” and tensions in relations between Washington and Riyadh has changed the political equations of the region and the world in general in the interest of the Resistance Movement. The United States, Israel, and Saudi Arabia have tried to marginalize the Palestinian cause over the course of the past two years by operationalizing the “deal of the century”. Under this plan, Jerusalem would be recognized as the capital of the Zionist regime forever, the issue of the return of the Palestinian refugees would be forgotten, and in return, Riyadh would provide $10 billion in aid to the Palestinian Authority annually. But the return of the Intifada faced the Deal of the Century with deadlock.

On the other hand, the adoption of two resolutions in support of the Palestinian people at the UN General Assembly showed that the conscience of the international community remains awake and completely alert against the conspiracy of America-Saudi-Israel trio. Although the two resolutions passed at the General Assembly are non-binding yet it has strongly undermined the dignity of the United States and supporters of the Zionist regime.

In rejecting the US-drafted resolution at the United Nations in condemnation of Hamas, it should be noted that Donald Trump’s aggressive policies and his open support for the two hated regimes of Saudi Arabia and Israel produced adverse consequences for the United States. The tragic murder of opposition Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi, Trump’s support for Saudi crown prince Mohamed bin Salman and the explicit admission by the US president that Jerusalem is the eternal capital of the Zionist regime, has caused public opinion to be strongly opposed to the aggressive and illogical policies of Washington. So, both the United Nations and the US institutions have strongly lined up against the White House policies, and now the United Nations and the US Congress have joined the lineup against the White House.

The US president seems to be facing more challenges in the domestic and foreign policy arenas in 2019; in this regard, the recent Senate resolution in condemnation of Mohamed bin Salman has highly isolated the White House.

In the meantime, the policy line of certain European countries in relation to Palestine is unclear. Despite the support of some small European countries for the Palestinian cause, the efforts of countries such as UK, France, and Germany are aimed at weakening the Resistance and strengthening the Zionist regime. The support of these European countries for the US policies on Israel and Saudi Arabia will isolate them before the public opinion in the future.

Regarding the achievements of such resolutions, it should be noted that, after the recent General Assembly meeting on Palestine, the United States, Saudi Arabia, and Israel were severely isolated as a destructive triangle of the region and the world. Instead, the Palestinian people, relying on international support for the intifada will continue their fight. On the other hand, the Zionist regime has been isolated politically over the past weeks after its defeat in the two-day Gaza war and the resignation of some ministers of the Benjamin Netanyahu cabinet. The Palestinian people will now be able to stand up against Israeli aggressions using their indigenous capabilities.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading