Impact of US Policies on Iran-China Relations

2018/12/18 | News, Opinion, Publications

Strategic Council Online: In view of the US pressures, China is trying to quietly maintain its relationship with Iran, a prominent example of which is the resumption of Iran-China banking relations. Abdolreza Faraji Rad - University Lecturer

Any analysis of US-China relations must be based on the fact that Washington’s strategy vis-à-vis China is a long-term one. The United States today describes China the biggest rival and also the biggest threat in the long run; therefore, the outbreak of trade-political encounters between the two countries is likely. A most recent example of such encounters is the arrest of the chief financial officer of tech giant Huawei for allegedly breaking the US sanctions against Iran. The executive Meng Wanjhou is under detention in Canada and is very likely to be handed to the US.

The incident occurred after Chinese and American presidents met in Buenos Aires and agreed to stop the trade war for three months and then begin negotiations.

In the political arena, it is sometimes necessary to adopt tactics to prevent the expansion of war and disputes from business arena to the political and military fields; and the Buenos Aires deal was reached to this end. Today, with the arrest of this senior Chinese executive, this tactic will be affected prompting China and the United States to go back to their previous stances. It’s important to note that the Chinese have the US number and have a lot of patience. They would not let this cause a new crisis with the United States. Washington, especially under Trump is determined to counter China and not allow Beijing to take advantage of the global opportunities. Today the race is between the two countries to take the helm. Therefore the United States and Trump are trying to do anything to counteract China’s growth and create further division between China-US economic growth.

The arrest of the Huawei executive is also part of the strategic struggle of the United States and some of its allies who describe China a threat. This American position also included a sideline portion which mentioned Iran and the issue of the sanctions. The United States is determined to deal with Iran and by increasing the pressures compel Tehran to sit at the negotiation table with Washington. However, the Iranian side is still resisting and there are still countries that are trying to maintain their secret or partly clandestine relationship with Iran despite the disadvantages ignoring the United States could have for them.

Given the fact that the final year of the presidency will always be a busy year for the administration, the US president will be involved in the election, and consequently, the external pressure will decrease. So the US president before entering his last year in power will increase its pressures and by sending such signals seeks to prevent other countries from trying to break the US sanctions and continuing to work with Iran. Americans see that China has the biggest volume of economic activity with Iran, and if it deals a blow on Beijing other countries will learn a lesson.

Nonetheless, tensions between the US and China will continue in the future. This will continue more or less no matter Trump will win the next round of the presidential race.

As for relations between China and Iran, it should be noted that, given the US pressure, Beijing is trying to maintain its ties with Tehran. An example is the resumption of banking ties between the two countries.

China-Iran relations depend heavily on creating a special European financial mechanism (SPV) for Iran. If this mechanism is established, China and Russia will work more easily with Iran because by creating this mechanism, some kind of global consensus will be reached to work with Iran. China’s relations with Iran too will be easier; but if this mechanism is somehow not created, China’s work in maintaining relations with Iran would be harder and the level of relations between the two countries will be lower.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

An Analysis of the Recent Elections in Turkey

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Turkey’s March 31 local elections, which ended with the opposition’s victory and Erdogan’s party’s defeat, is considered an important “decisive point” in the future of Turkey’s domestic and foreign policy developments.
It determines the fate of several important political issues, in addition to the election of mayors and local managers for the next five years.
Hamid Khosayand – expert on regional issues

The strategy of the Israeli regime to get rid of the defeat in Gaza

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: It has been about six months since the Israeli regime attacked the Gaza Strip in October 2023. In the initial weeks and months of the attack, many analysts believed that the Israeli regime, based on its usual practice in wars after the Palestinian intifada, would agree to a truce and end the war after inflicting multiple casualties and damages.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University professor

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

An Analysis of the Recent Elections in Turkey

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Turkey’s March 31 local elections, which ended with the opposition’s victory and Erdogan’s party’s defeat, is considered an important “decisive point” in the future of Turkey’s domestic and foreign policy developments.
It determines the fate of several important political issues, in addition to the election of mayors and local managers for the next five years.
Hamid Khosayand – expert on regional issues

The strategy of the Israeli regime to get rid of the defeat in Gaza

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: It has been about six months since the Israeli regime attacked the Gaza Strip in October 2023. In the initial weeks and months of the attack, many analysts believed that the Israeli regime, based on its usual practice in wars after the Palestinian intifada, would agree to a truce and end the war after inflicting multiple casualties and damages.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University professor

Loading