Impact of Netanyahu Government on US-Israeli Relations

Strategic Council Online - Interview: A researcher on the Zionist regime affairs, commenting on the US interference in the formation of Benjamin Netanyahu’s new government and efforts to prevent extremists of the far-right party from entering the government, said: If we look at the process of what happened to form the cabinet, it becomes clear that the Americans could not have a major impact on this process.

In an interview with the website of the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, Mansour Barati explained: In fact, Netanyahu has no choice but to form an alliance with far-right parties, because he has no other option to form a government, and the remaining parties will not cooperate with Netanyahu.

Barati continued: In practice, Netanyahu has held negotiations with far-right parties such as the Jewish Power Party led by Itamar Ben-Guyer and agreements have been reached in this regard. Also, Ben-Guyer is supposed to take over the Ministry of Internal Security, and the “Ministry for the Development of the Negev and Galilee” in the northern region of the occupied territories will also be integrated into the Ministry of Internal Security and will be under Ben-Guyer’s control. Part of the security issues of those areas will also be entrusted to Ben-Guyer.

According to the researcher, negotiations with Bezalel Smotrich, the leader of the Religious Zionist Party, are going well according to Netanyahu, and Smotrich is supposed to be the finance minister and responsible for determining the security situation in the West Bank.

He explained that Smotrich was supposed to be the Minister of War first, but neither Netanyahu nor the Americans agreed with this; because this ministry is very important and the second most important ministry in the Zionist regime; therefore, because Smotrich had no military experience and had not even been a soldier, they did not accept him for that position.

According to Barati, this concern was resolved and it was decided that someone else would become the minister of war, but the problem is that in line with security issues, Netanyahu pays a lot of ransom to the extreme right and wants to divide the authority of the security issues of different regions of the Zionist regime among them. For example, Netanyahu has given the Negev and Galilee region to Ben-Guyer and wants to give the West Bank to Smotrich.

The expert continued: Of course, the Zionist army also opposes this issue and has announced that the presence of those people will cause problems and contradictions for the army.

The researcher on the Zionist regime affairs, referring to the opposition of the United States to the far-right parties in that regime said: The opposition of the Americans is more with Ben-Guyer coming to power. Because in the past, Ben-Guyer was a member of an extreme right-wing group called Lehava, which was included in the US terrorist list during the presidency of Barack Obama; therefore, now because of Ben-Guyer’s membership in that group, he is on the black list of the United States, and if he wants to travel to the US as a minister, there is an obstacle on his way.

In response to the question that how long the tension between Tel Aviv and Washington will continue with the establishment of far-right parties, Barati stressed: At least as long as the Democrats are in the White House, such issues will lead to problems in the relations between the two countries and the Zionist regime and the United States cannot have much cooperation.

He continued: The Americans have already announced that if the extremists are included in the government, they will not cooperate with them, and cooperation will suffer.

He added that under such conditions, relations between Tel Aviv and Washington will not progress as before and tensions will arise.

According to the researcher on the Zionist regime affairs, such issues did not make Netanyahu change his opinion regarding the composition of the government and ministers; as the negotiations continue and he wants to bring those people into the government, because as it was said, the rest of the parties have announced that they will not cooperate with Netanyahu, and only the far-right parties and two religious parties have agreed to work with him. Therefore, Netanyahu has no other choice to form the government.

Barati said: In this situation, Netanyahu may inevitably agree to the entry of those people into the government, but then he will control them; but the problem is that Netanyahu may be able to control the religious parties, but the extreme right insists on their positions very much and are not at all ready to give concessions.

He emphasized: From now on, the vision has taken shape that if the government is formed, the ministers who came from far-right parties will move things in the direction they distinguish themselves.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading