The causes and consequences of stopping Turkey’s participation in joint patrols with Russia in northern Syria

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on Syrian affairs stated that the suspension of Turkey's participation in joint patrols with Russia in northern Syria means that operations in that region are definitive and that a political deadlock is created to reduce the conflict in northern Syria, adding that Americans once again refused to back the Kurds in Syria and Moscow’s and Washington's cooperation with Ankara and falling short of Turkey's preferences in northern Syria show their need for Turkey in the developments related to the war in Ukraine.

Mostafa Najafi, referring to the report by the Russian Defense Ministry which suggested that Turkey has stopped participating in joint patrols in Syria, and terrorists are planning to use drones to attack Russia’s Hmeimim air base in Syria, told the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations that “in the last two-three weeks, we have seen new developments in northern Syria. After the terrorist attack that happened in Istanbul, Erdogan spoke about the fourth phase of Turkey’s operation in Syria in order to reduce domestic political pressures and manage the upcoming elections”.

He added that the announcement of Turkey’s fourth operation in northern Syria has created new developments in that region; Among other things, the mediation of the Russians between the Kurds and the Turkish government seems to have almost failed. “The Kurds announced that they do not agree with the things that have been transferred to them, including the distance of 30 kilometers from the borders of Turkey. Also, they do not agree to hand over PKK officials and the Kurdish groups in Syria. These issues increased tensions.”

This analyst of Syrian affairs stated that according to the published news, the first phase of Turkey’s military operation in Syria will begin soon.

He added that the Turks have largely used their bargaining power against the United States and the Russians, who have opposed Turkey’s operations in northern Syria until now and have used and increased this power due to the developments caused by the war in Ukraine. In this situation, Turkey’s hands have been largely opened for operations in northern Syria.

Najafi added that it seems that Russia’s previous opposition to Turkey’s operation in northern Syria is not 100 percent present, and the United States has left Turkey’s hand open and given them the green light.

He said that the patrols that were carried out were also in line with the agreements regarding Astana and the reduction of tension in northern Syria. Therefore, the suspension of Turkey’s participation in joint patrols with Russia in northern Syria means that operations in that region are definitive and create a political deadlock to reduce tension in northern Syria.

He added that it seems that this operation will start soon from the “Tal Rifat” area, but it is not clear whether it will spread to the “Manbij” or “Ain al-Arab” areas, but most likely Turkey will try to push the Kurdish forces towards “Hasakah”.

Recalling that Erdogan’s strategy so far has been to use external developments in line with internal and political issues for election purposes, Najafi added that Erdogan is under severe pressure from his opposition groups and this issue is more severe especially in relation to refugees, so he is trying to reduce some of the political pressure by launching a new operation in Syria.

He added that “of course, this action can turn into a double-edged sword and have the opposite result; Even though, according to the published news, Bashar Assad has refused to meet with Erdogan. This reaction could be the consequence of Turkey’s decision to send troops to northern Syria.”

This expert on Syrian issues stated that the attack on northern Syria overshadows many projects related to Turkey’s foreign policy in Syria, and emphasized that certainly, the normalization of relations could have benefited Erdogan, but considering the developments and resistance of the Kurds, as well as dissatisfaction of the Syrian government, we will witness the consequences for Erdogan personally himself. In addition, this operation will greatly increase the instabilities in northern Syria, an issue that will not benefit Turkey internally and externally.

Referring to the numerous meetings between the security officials of Turkey and Syria in the past year, regarding the consequences of Turkey’s operation in northern Syria on political processes, he said that despite these negotiations and the mediation of the Russians to hold a meeting between Assad and Erdogan, until the fate of some cases is not clear, the normalization of the relations between these two countries will not happen. Anyway, Turkey is present in Idlib as an occupying force and supports the opposition forces of the Syrian government.

Najafi reminded that Turkey’s expansionism and military campaigns in northern Syria by damaging the country’s territorial integrity continue to accumulate threatening perceptions between the two countries. The Americans are also dissatisfied with any normalization of relations between Turkey and Syria and try to prevent it; Because this normalization of relations can strengthen the international legitimacy of the Syrian government and help establish political and security stability in this country.

This analyst of Syrian affairs emphasized that the Astana process was almost successful despite all the moves that Turkey made in northern Syria, but one of the main reasons that caused the Russians to be soft towards Turkey’s operations is the war in Ukraine. In any case, Russia is currently cooperating extensively with Turkey, especially in relation to circumventing sanctions. This issue makes them unable to apply the necessary pressure regarding the Syrian issue. Knowing about Russia’s strategic needs, Turkey put a lot of pressure to start a new phase of its operations in northern Syria and almost succeeded in imposing its preferences on Russia.

Referring to the statements of the American officials that they have ended their joint operations with the Kurds, he said that the Americans have once again abandoned the Kurds in Syria, and Moscow and Washington’s cooperation with Ankara shows their need for Turkey in the developments related to the war in Ukraine which has caused them to fall short of Turkey’s preferences in northern Syria.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Zionist Regime’s Post-War Map for Gaza

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Middle East issues said: After nearly 150 days have passed since the attacks of Israeli planes on Gaza and the unprecedented genocide in this city, regional and international efforts to end the Gaza crisis have intensified.

Reasons for Inaction & Inefficiency of Intl Organizations in Providing Aid to Gaza

Strategic Council Online: An expert on regional issues said: With the start of the Gaza war, many major powers and international organizations not only did not take honest action to support the defenseless Palestinian people, but instead, with their support for the actions of the Zionist regime, they caused their crimes to increase over the past five months.

France and the Two-State Solution in Occupied Territories

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on regional issues said: The announcement of France’s agreement with the formation of two states in the Occupied Territories is a measure to raise the international image of France and reduce domestic pressure on the Macron government for inaction against the Israeli crimes in Gaza.

The Prospect of US Military Withdrawal from Iraq

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: Although most currents, politicians and even ordinary people in Iraq call for withdrawal of American military forces from their country, there are sometimes differences of opinion regarding the time of this withdrawal. On the one hand, Mohammad Shia al-Sudani, the Prime Minister of Iraq, is very serious in demanding the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Still, he wants to achieve this goal through “negotiation and political deal”. On the other hand, the Iraqi Resistance groups want the Americans to leave this country as soon as possible. The American side is also talking about a military withdrawal from Iraq in the next three years.

Russia’s Multifaceted Relations with Neighbors

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An international affairs expert said: After Russia attacked Ukraine two years ago, the country’s relations with some of its European neighbors were severely disturbed in such a way that a clear future cannot be imagined for it.

Solution to Get Out of FATF Blacklist and Get Rid of Its Heavy Costs?

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The Financial Action Task Force, FATF, announced on Friday, February 23, that the name of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains on the “blacklist” of this international organization. A decision that was not unexpected for the authorities of our country. According to the Governor of the Central Bank of Iran, one day before the release of the FATF statement, due to the current sanctions, Iran is looking for its own FATF, as it uses other tools instead of SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications). On this basis, it seems that while the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon were removed from the “Grey List” of FATF in the previous reviews in June 2024, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not trying to be exempted from the blacklist. But what kind of organization is FATF, and why are some in Iran against joining it? And what is the way out of this situation?

Loading