The role and interests of the Zionist regime in preventing the nuclear agreement

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An analyst of the Zionist regime affairs, referring to the actions that the Zionist regime has taken in order to obstruct the nuclear negotiations and prevent the agreement, said that this regime has not allowed the nuclear agreement with Iran to be concluded with the influence and full cooperation of the United States. And even though Europe declares that the nuclear deal will serve their interests, it has moved in line with the goals of the Zionist regime.

In an interview with the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations, Ali Abdi added that the Zionist regime is part of the global domination system, in fact, this regime is defined “in” the domination system and Iran is defined as “over” the domination system, and the nature of the Islamic Revolution in 1957 was anti-domination in nature.

He stated that in the interpretation of the Imam (RA) and the Supreme Leader of the Revolution, Zionism is known as the central headquarters, the heart and brain of the global system of domination, and Zionism is not only the Zionist regime. He added that Zionism has a nature beyond Israeli nature, therefore the Zionist regime finds a special due to its connection with international Zionism, it has a very high power to influence the power structure, decision-making and decision-making of the dominant world system.

This expert on the issues of the Zionist regime said that therefore, in many Western decisions about the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Zionist regime has always been a main player in the field of decision-making, openly and secretly, directly and indirectly.

Abdi continued that “the Zionist regime follows several pillars in its policies in the region; Among other things, in the security doctrine of this regime, no one in the Middle East, except this regime, has the right to go nuclear, especially in terms of military. Based on the “Begin” security doctrine, which was formed after the attack on Iraq’s Osirak nuclear reactor in 1981, the Zionist regime tries to prevent any country or power in the Middle East from gaining nuclear power and capability, even peacefully”.

He stated that the ability of the Zionist regime to play a role in the nuclear case is high in both negative and positive aspects, and added that in a negative aspect, considering the ability, influence and impact that this regime has in the decision-making processes in the United States and Europe, it can have a direct and serious effect on these decisions. On the positive side, they are trying to present an extremely hateful and anti-human image of the Islamic Republic of Iran by investing heavily in propaganda, media and discourse creation.

This analyst of the Zionist regime’s issues reminded that this regime tries to match the anti-Zionist discourse with the anti-Jewish and anti-Semitic discourse in the international system and in line with its interests and create an overlap. In the event that the Islamic Revolution has made a serious distinction between them since its inception and has drawn a bold line between them.

Abdi stated that the Zionist regime will not allow the nuclear agreement with Iran to be concluded with the influence it always exerts and the United States has been in full cooperation with them, and emphasized that the non-resolution of this issue has 100% harmed the Zionists and the Americans. In fact, with the resolution of this issue, many of their security and political projects against Iran and in the region will be rejected and lead to failure. For this reason, the Zionists have always looked at the nuclear case as an opportunity against Iran.

Stating that Europe is not willing to sacrifice relations with Iran for relations with the Zionist regime, Abdi pointed out European silence in the face of the assassination of Iran’s nuclear scientists, sabotage and threats against Iran by this regime and continued that in the past weeks, the Zionist regime has repeatedly asked the West to leave the JCPOA negotiation table with Iran and end the talks to revive the nuclear deal with Iran.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

An Analysis of the Recent Elections in Turkey

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Turkey’s March 31 local elections, which ended with the opposition’s victory and Erdogan’s party’s defeat, is considered an important “decisive point” in the future of Turkey’s domestic and foreign policy developments.
It determines the fate of several important political issues, in addition to the election of mayors and local managers for the next five years.
Hamid Khosayand – expert on regional issues

The strategy of the Israeli regime to get rid of the defeat in Gaza

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: It has been about six months since the Israeli regime attacked the Gaza Strip in October 2023. In the initial weeks and months of the attack, many analysts believed that the Israeli regime, based on its usual practice in wars after the Palestinian intifada, would agree to a truce and end the war after inflicting multiple casualties and damages.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University professor

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Biden-Netanyahu Rift Grows Wider, But US-Israel Strategic Relations Persist

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In recent weeks, the verbal disputes between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the Gaza war have increased. The tensions that have arisen are such that some international observers interpret it as a difference between America and the Zionist regime, and some talk about the first “rift” between the two sides in the last 76 years.

The impact of recent Turkish elections on the political future of the ruling party

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President of Turkiye, on the same night that he won the second round of the presidential elections in May 2023, told the crowd of his supporters, “We love Istanbul, we started our journey to this city, and we will continue it.” At the same time, he wanted to take back the Istanbul Municipality from the rival and kept repeating that we will take back Istanbul. Erdogan referred to the Istanbul Municipality, which his party lost in 2019 elections of this metropolis and the economic capital of Turkiye, to his Republican opponent, Akram Imamoglu.
Siyamak Kakaee—Researcher of Turkiye affairs

Netanyahu’s Internal Challenges

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: The increasing trend of political and security “challenges” in the Zionist regime is one of the “important consequences” of the Gaza war.
Hamid Khoshayand – expert on regional issues

An Analysis on Dimensions of European Support for Ukraine

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: In the wake of the war in Ukraine, which has affected the international community, especially Europe, the leaders of the three EU member states, France, Germany, and Poland, recently agreed to increase efforts to purchase and produce weapons in Ukraine.
Hossein Sayahi – International Researcher

An Analysis of the Recent Elections in Turkey

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: Turkey’s March 31 local elections, which ended with the opposition’s victory and Erdogan’s party’s defeat, is considered an important “decisive point” in the future of Turkey’s domestic and foreign policy developments.
It determines the fate of several important political issues, in addition to the election of mayors and local managers for the next five years.
Hamid Khosayand – expert on regional issues

The strategy of the Israeli regime to get rid of the defeat in Gaza

Strategic Council Online-Opinion: It has been about six months since the Israeli regime attacked the Gaza Strip in October 2023. In the initial weeks and months of the attack, many analysts believed that the Israeli regime, based on its usual practice in wars after the Palestinian intifada, would agree to a truce and end the war after inflicting multiple casualties and damages.
Mohammad Mehdi Mazaheri—University professor

Loading