The causes and consequences of stopping Turkey’s participation in joint patrols with Russia in northern Syria

Strategic Council Online—Interview: An expert on Syrian affairs stated that the suspension of Turkey's participation in joint patrols with Russia in northern Syria means that operations in that region are definitive and that a political deadlock is created to reduce the conflict in northern Syria, adding that Americans once again refused to back the Kurds in Syria and Moscow’s and Washington's cooperation with Ankara and falling short of Turkey's preferences in northern Syria show their need for Turkey in the developments related to the war in Ukraine.

Mostafa Najafi, referring to the report by the Russian Defense Ministry which suggested that Turkey has stopped participating in joint patrols in Syria, and terrorists are planning to use drones to attack Russia’s Hmeimim air base in Syria, told the Strategic Council on Foreign Relations that “in the last two-three weeks, we have seen new developments in northern Syria. After the terrorist attack that happened in Istanbul, Erdogan spoke about the fourth phase of Turkey’s operation in Syria in order to reduce domestic political pressures and manage the upcoming elections”.

He added that the announcement of Turkey’s fourth operation in northern Syria has created new developments in that region; Among other things, the mediation of the Russians between the Kurds and the Turkish government seems to have almost failed. “The Kurds announced that they do not agree with the things that have been transferred to them, including the distance of 30 kilometers from the borders of Turkey. Also, they do not agree to hand over PKK officials and the Kurdish groups in Syria. These issues increased tensions.”

This analyst of Syrian affairs stated that according to the published news, the first phase of Turkey’s military operation in Syria will begin soon.

He added that the Turks have largely used their bargaining power against the United States and the Russians, who have opposed Turkey’s operations in northern Syria until now and have used and increased this power due to the developments caused by the war in Ukraine. In this situation, Turkey’s hands have been largely opened for operations in northern Syria.

Najafi added that it seems that Russia’s previous opposition to Turkey’s operation in northern Syria is not 100 percent present, and the United States has left Turkey’s hand open and given them the green light.

He said that the patrols that were carried out were also in line with the agreements regarding Astana and the reduction of tension in northern Syria. Therefore, the suspension of Turkey’s participation in joint patrols with Russia in northern Syria means that operations in that region are definitive and create a political deadlock to reduce tension in northern Syria.

He added that it seems that this operation will start soon from the “Tal Rifat” area, but it is not clear whether it will spread to the “Manbij” or “Ain al-Arab” areas, but most likely Turkey will try to push the Kurdish forces towards “Hasakah”.

Recalling that Erdogan’s strategy so far has been to use external developments in line with internal and political issues for election purposes, Najafi added that Erdogan is under severe pressure from his opposition groups and this issue is more severe especially in relation to refugees, so he is trying to reduce some of the political pressure by launching a new operation in Syria.

He added that “of course, this action can turn into a double-edged sword and have the opposite result; Even though, according to the published news, Bashar Assad has refused to meet with Erdogan. This reaction could be the consequence of Turkey’s decision to send troops to northern Syria.”

This expert on Syrian issues stated that the attack on northern Syria overshadows many projects related to Turkey’s foreign policy in Syria, and emphasized that certainly, the normalization of relations could have benefited Erdogan, but considering the developments and resistance of the Kurds, as well as dissatisfaction of the Syrian government, we will witness the consequences for Erdogan personally himself. In addition, this operation will greatly increase the instabilities in northern Syria, an issue that will not benefit Turkey internally and externally.

Referring to the numerous meetings between the security officials of Turkey and Syria in the past year, regarding the consequences of Turkey’s operation in northern Syria on political processes, he said that despite these negotiations and the mediation of the Russians to hold a meeting between Assad and Erdogan, until the fate of some cases is not clear, the normalization of the relations between these two countries will not happen. Anyway, Turkey is present in Idlib as an occupying force and supports the opposition forces of the Syrian government.

Najafi reminded that Turkey’s expansionism and military campaigns in northern Syria by damaging the country’s territorial integrity continue to accumulate threatening perceptions between the two countries. The Americans are also dissatisfied with any normalization of relations between Turkey and Syria and try to prevent it; Because this normalization of relations can strengthen the international legitimacy of the Syrian government and help establish political and security stability in this country.

This analyst of Syrian affairs emphasized that the Astana process was almost successful despite all the moves that Turkey made in northern Syria, but one of the main reasons that caused the Russians to be soft towards Turkey’s operations is the war in Ukraine. In any case, Russia is currently cooperating extensively with Turkey, especially in relation to circumventing sanctions. This issue makes them unable to apply the necessary pressure regarding the Syrian issue. Knowing about Russia’s strategic needs, Turkey put a lot of pressure to start a new phase of its operations in northern Syria and almost succeeded in imposing its preferences on Russia.

Referring to the statements of the American officials that they have ended their joint operations with the Kurds, he said that the Americans have once again abandoned the Kurds in Syria, and Moscow and Washington’s cooperation with Ankara shows their need for Turkey in the developments related to the war in Ukraine which has caused them to fall short of Turkey’s preferences in northern Syria.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LATEST CONTENT

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading

Últimas publicaciones

The Complexities and the Necessity of Confronting ISIS-Khorasan

Strategic Council Online – Note: With the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the issue of ISIS-Khorasan, the conflict between these two groups, and the expansion of the scope of their security threats in the region have become more critical than ever before, as the terrorist activities of this terrorist group disrupt regional security. In addition to this, support for suicide activities and armed individuals in the region has also put the security of Iran at risk. Therefore, ISIS-Khorasan is recognized as a significant threat to the eastern security of our country.
Dr. Hossein Ebrahimnia – Regional Issues Expert

Perspective of Relations between Kurdistan Regional Government and Baghdad

Strategic Council Online – Interview: An expert on Iraq issues said: As Turkey gets closer to the central government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) should overlook many of its claims about its autonomy in the future and will become more dependent on the central government.

An Analysis on Importance & Status of Measures Taken by the Hague Court Regarding the Gaza War

Strategic Council Online – Interview: A former Iranian diplomat says The Court of Justice at the Hauge adopted new measures in early April, according to which the Zionist regime “given the worsening conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza, in particular, the spread of famine and starvation,” shall take “all necessary and effective measures to ensure, without delay, in full cooperation with the United Nations, the unhindered provision at scale by all concerned of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to Palestinians throughout Gaza.”

An analysis of the failure of the Zionist regime’s strategy in the Gaza war

Strategic Council Online – Opinion: More than six months have passed since the war in Gaza. Although the Zionist regime was fully supported by the United States during this period and is present in the war scene with all its might, it has not been able to achieve any of its “declared” and “practical” goals.
Hamid Khoshayand –Expert of regional issues

Characteristics and Strategic Consequences of Iran’s Historic Response to Zionist Regime

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: There are two different views about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s missile attacks against the Zionist regime. The first view is based on a superficial reading and a reductionist description that evaluates it as a low-impact and not-so-extensive operation. The second view, a realistic reading, sees Iran’s response as opening a new page of “balance of power” and “turning point” in regional equations, the effects and consequences of which will gradually emerge.

Opportunities & Challenges of NATO on Its 75th Birthday

Strategic Council Online—Opinion: An expert on international affairs said: Although NATO, on its 75th birthday, has become more cohesive than three decades ago due to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, this does not mean it will not face challenges in its future prospects.

Loading